| Literature DB >> 28924553 |
Liqian Ci1, Zhigang Huang1, Yu Liu2, Zhepeng Liu1, Gang Wei2, Weiyue Lu2.
Abstract
Lack of mucoadhesive properties is the major drawback to poloxamer 407 (F127)-based in situ hydrogels for mucosal administration. The objective of the present study was to construct a novel mucoadhesive and thermosensitive in situ hydrogel drug delivery system based on an amino-functionalized poloxamer for vaginal administration. First, amino-functionalized poloxamer 407 (F127-NH2) was synthesized and characterized with respect to its micellization behavior and interaction with mucin. Then using acetate gossypol (AG) as model drug, AG-loaded F127-NH2-based in situ hydrogels (NFGs) were evaluated with respect to rheology, drug release, ex vivo vaginal mucosal adhesion, in vivo intravaginal retention and local irritation after vaginal administration to healthy female mice. The results show that F127-NH2 is capable of forming a thermosensitive in situ hydrogel with sustained drug release properties. An interaction between positively charged F127-NH2 and negatively charged mucin was revealed by changes in the particle size and zeta potential of mucin particles as well as an increase in the complex modulus of NFG caused by mucin. Ex vivo and in vivo fluorescence imaging and quantitative analysis of the amount of AG remaining in mouse vaginal lavage all demonstrated greater intravaginal retention of NFG than that of an unmodified F127-based in situ hydrogel. In conclusion, amino group functionalization confers valuable mucoadhesive properties on poloxamer 407.Entities:
Keywords: ACN, anhydrous acetonitrile; AG, acetate gossypol; AG-loaded FG, F127 gel-loaded with acetate gossypol; AG-loaded NFG, F127-NH2 gel-loaded with acetate gossypol; ANOVA, one-way analysis of variance; Acetate gossypol; Amino group; C6, 6-coumarin; CDI, carbonyl diimidazole; CMC, critical micelle concentration; DAPI, 2-(4-amidinophenyl)-6-indolecarbamindine dihydrochloride; DLS, dynamic light scattering; DPH, 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene; DTT, dithiothreitol; DiR, 1,1ʹ-dioctadecyl-3,3,3ʹ,3ʹ-tetramethylindotricarbocyanine iodide; EDTA, ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid; EMS, endometriosis; F127, Pluronic F127; FG, F127 gel; FTIR, Fourier transform infrared; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; ICR, Institute of Cancer Research; In situ hydrogel; Mucoadhesive gel; NF, amino-functionalised poloxamer 407; NFG, aminated poloxamer 407-based temperature sensitive hydrogel; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance; OCT, optical coherence tomography; PBS, phosphate buffered saline; PDI, polydispersity index; PEO, poly(ethylene oxide); PGM, porcine gastric mucin; PPO, poly(propylene oxide); Poloxamer 407; TEM, transmission electron microscopy; VFS, vaginal fluid stimulant
Year: 2017 PMID: 28924553 PMCID: PMC5595263 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2017.03.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Pharm Sin B ISSN: 2211-3835 Impact factor: 11.413
Figure 1Speculation on the in vivo fate of NFG.
Figure 2Synthesis of F127-NH2 (a = 100, b = 65).
Figure 3TEM photographs of (A) F127 micelles, (B) F127-NH2 micelles and (C) AG-loaded F127-NH2 micelles (scale bar: 50 nm).
Figure 4Rheology of NFG vs. FG: (A)–(C) show the complex modulus vs. temperature profiles of NFG vs. FG at concentrations (w/w) of (A) 15%; (B) 17.5%, and (C) 20%. (D)–(F) show the complex modulus vs. frequency profiles of NFG vs. FG at concentrations (w/w) of (D) 15% (E) 17.5% and (F) 20%. (G) shows the complex modulus vs. temperature profiles for AG-loaded NFG vs. AG-loaded FG at F127-NH2 or F127 concentrations of 20% w/w.
Figure 5Interaction between mucin and F127 or F127-NH2: (A)–(D) Size distribution measured by DLS for (A) mixture of F127 and mucin at pH 5; (B) mixture of F127-NH2 and mucin at pH 5; (C) mixture of F127 and mucin pH 6.5; and (D) mixture of F127-NH2 and mucin pH 6.5. (E) Zeta potentials of the mixtures of F127 or F127-NH2 (NF) and mucin at different weight ratios and at (left) pH 5 and (right) pH 6.5. The concentration of F127-NH2 (or F127) was fixed at 250 mg/mL (n = 3, mean ± S.D.). (F) Change in the complex modulus caused by mixing FG (blue) or NFG (purple) with mucin at different weight radios. = G*[PGM/hydrogel mixture] – (G*[PGM] + G*[hydrogel]). Data are mean ± S.D., n = 3; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Figure 6Gel dissolution and drug release of AG from AG-loaded NFG and AG-loaded FG in vaginal fluid stimulant as release medium at 37 °C. (A) Change in gel weight as a function of time; (B) percentage drug release vs. time profiles. Data are mean±S.D., n = 3.
Figure 7Ex vivo and in vivo mucoadhesion. (A) Typical fluorescence images of the ex vivo adhesion of NFG, AG-loaded NFG and FG to the surface of vaginal tissues of mice after flushing with vaginal fluid stimulant (VFS) at 37 °C; (B) Semi-qualitative results of fluorescent intensity remaining on ex vivo vaginal mucosa after flushing with VFS at 37 °C for different times (data are mean ± S.D., n = 6); (C) Typical fluorescent images of mice intravaginally administered either DiR-loaded FG, NFG or AG-loaded NFG; (D) Semi-qualitative results of the fluorescent intensity of the lower abdomen of mice vaginally administered with either FG, NFG or AG-loaded NFG (data are mean ± S.D., n = 6); (E) Fluorescent microscopic photographs of longitudinal sections of vaginal mucosa from mice vaginally administered with C6-labelled FG, NFG or AG-loaded NFG. Green signal C6; blue signal DAPI (scale bar:100 μm). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.
Figure 8(A) In vivo retention of AG in the vagina of mice after intravaginal application of AG-loaded FG or NFG measured by vaginal lavage (data are mean ± S.D., n = 6); (B) local mucosal irritation of NFG evaluated by histological photographs of H&E stained cross-sections of vaginal tissues from mice intravaginally administered either an AG suspension (free AG), AG-loaded FG, AG-loaded NFG or normal saline after (a)–(d) 24 h and (e)–(h) one week later. Scale bar: 100 μm.