Literature DB >> 28924319

Bibliometric Indices of Scientific Journals: Time to overcome the obsession and think beyond the Impact Factor.

C K Ranjan1,2.   

Abstract

Journal Impact Factor (JIF) has been widely used for a long time as a proxy marker of journal prestige. However, off late, accuracy and reliability of JIF for evaluation of scientific journals has been increasingly questioned by numerous stakeholders in the field of scholarly publications. Having realized the perils and pitfalls of JIF, there is an increasing understanding among academia to develop and consider alternatives to the traditional JIF. It is possibly time for all concerned to understand the pros and cons of JIF to overcome this obsession. Limitations of JIF and possible alternative and emerging bibliometric indicators are being discussed in this article for the benefit of the readers of MJAFI.

Keywords:  Alternative bibliometric indices; Journal Impact Factor; Scientific publications

Year:  2017        PMID: 28924319      PMCID: PMC5592267          DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2017.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India        ISSN: 0377-1237


  12 in total

1.  Impact Factor: Vagaries, inconsistencies and illogicalities; should it be abandoned?

Authors:  Andrew J Stewart Coats; Louise G Shewan
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.

Authors:  J E Hirsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The history and meaning of the journal impact factor.

Authors:  Eugene Garfield
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.

Authors:  P O Seglen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-02-15

5.  Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics, and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics.

Authors:  Mehdi Dadkhah; Tomasz Maliszewski; Jaime A Teixeira da Silva
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.007

6.  The story of fake impact factor companies and how we detected them.

Authors:  Mehrdad Jalalian
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2015-06-05

7.  A proposal for a novel impact factor as an alternative to the JCR impact factor.

Authors:  Zu-Guo Yang; Chun-Ting Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A Large-Scale Analysis of Impact Factor Biased Journal Self-Citations.

Authors:  Caspar Chorus; Ludo Waltman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Journal Impact Factor is under attack - use the CAPCI factor instead.

Authors:  Eleftherios P Diamandis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Comparison Between Impact Factor, Eigenfactor Metrics, and SCimago Journal Rank Indicator of Pediatric Neurology Journals.

Authors:  Hamidreza Kianifar; Ramin Sadeghi; Leili Zarifmahmoudi
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.