Literature DB >> 28924228

An expanded role for heterozygous mutations of ABCB4, ABCB11, ATP8B1, ABCC2 and TJP2 in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

Peter H Dixon1, Melissa Sambrotta2, Jennifer Chambers1, Pamela Taylor-Harris1, Argyro Syngelaki3, Kypros Nicolaides3, A S Knisely4,5, Richard J Thompson2, Catherine Williamson6.   

Abstract

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) affects 1/140 UK pregnancies; with pruritus, hepatic impairment and elevated serum bile acids. Severe disease is complicated by spontaneous preterm delivery and stillbirth. Previous studies have reported mutations in hepatocellular transporters (ABCB4, ABCB11). High throughput sequencing in 147 patients was performed in the transporters ABCB4, ABCB11, ATP8B1, ABCC2 and tight junction protein 2 (TJP2). Twenty-six potentially damaging variants were identified with the following predicted protein changes: Twelve ABCB4 mutations - Arg47Gln, Met113Val, Glu161Gly, Thr175Ala, Glu528Glyfs*6, Arg590Gln, Ala601Ser, Glu884Ter, Gly722Ala, Tyr775Met (x2), Trp854Ter. Four potential ABCB11 mutations - Glu297Gly (x3) and a donor splice site mutation (intron 19). Five potential ATP8B1 mutations - Asn45Thr (x3), and two others, Glu114Gln and Lys203Glu. Two ABCC2 mutations - Glu1352Ala and a duplication (exons 24 and 25). Three potential mutations were identified in TJP2; Thr62Met (x2) and Thr626Ser. No patient harboured more than one mutation. All were heterozygous. An additional 545 cases were screened for the potential recurrent mutations of ATP8B1 (Asn45Thr) and TJP2 (Thr62Met) identifying three further occurrences of Asn45Thr. This study has expanded known mutations in ABCB4 and ABCB11 and identified roles in ICP for mutations in ATP8B1 and ABCC2. Possible novel mutations in TJP2 were also discovered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28924228      PMCID: PMC5603585          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-11626-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP), also called obstetric cholestasis, is the commonest pregnancy-specific liver disease. Typically presenting in the third trimester, ICP can be debilitating for the mother and threaten the health of the fetus[1-3]. Affected women have abnormal values of hepatobiliary-injury biomarkers, including raised serum bile acid (BA) concentrations[4], that typically resolve by 12 weeks postpartum. Adverse pregnancy outcomes occur more commonly when maternal serum bile acid concentrations are >40 µmol/L. They include spontaneous preterm labour, prolonged admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and third trimester intrauterine death[2,3,5,6]. ICP is associated with a disrupted metabolic profile[7,8] and can have long-term consequences for the health of the mother[9,10] and child[11]. The aetiology of ICP is complex and not fully understood, but a role has been established for the effect of elevated reproductive hormones towards the end of pregnancy (estrogens and sulphated progesterone metabolites), when the disease most commonly presents ([12,13], reviewed in ref.[14]). Indications of genetic involvement in disease susceptibility are clear (reviewed in ref.[15]). Pedigree studies have identified families where ICP is inherited in an autosomal dominant sex-limited fashion[16,17]. The varying geographical prevalence also indicates genetic involvement, with population-specific genetic backgrounds conferring different levels of risk[18]. Historically the prevalence of ICP was highest amongst the Native Chilean population[19]. Further evidence of genetic involvement comes from sibling studies that show a 12-fold increase in risk between parous sisters[20,21]. Severe childhood liver disease can be caused by homozygous mutations in genes that encode transporters involved in bile formation at the hepatocyte canalicular membrane. These transporters play roles in cholestatic disorders that range in severity from progressive paediatric disease to transient cholestasis associated with drug ingestion or pregnancy (ICP)[22]. Studies of the gene ABCB4, (ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 4) encoding the phosphotidylcholine floppase MDR3 and homozygously mutated in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) type 3, identified a heterozygous mutation of ABCB4 first in a familial case[23] and then in a sporadic instance of ICP[24]. Subsequent studies have identified a wide range of mutations of ABCB4 in ICP, most commonly missense mutations[15]. Approximately 10% of women with ICP harbour a mutated allele of ABCB4 [15]. Mutations of ABCB4 have also been implicated in drug-induced cholestasis[25] and low phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis[26]. The bile salt export pump (BSEP), encoded by the gene ABCB11, (ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 11) is homozygously mutated in PFIC type 2 and benign recurrent intrahepatic cholestasis (BRIC) type 2[27]. Several studies found ABCB11 mutations in women affected with ICP[28-30]. Of note is that in addition to causative mutations of ABCB4 and ABCB11 acting as Mendelian-like alleles, population studies of ICP cohorts have identified common genetic variants at these loci that contribute to disease risk, albeit to a much smaller degree than causative mutations[31]. The third PFIC (and BRIC) gene, ATP8B1, (ATPase class 8B member 1) encoding a phosphatidyl serine flippase (familial intrahepatic cholestasis 1, FIC1), has only been studied to a limited extent (with respect to sequencing) in ICP cohorts, and hence the role of genetic variation at this locus in ICP is not established[32,33]. A functional interdependence of this flippase with MDR3 in hepatocytes suggests that ATP8B1 remains a viable candidate for involvement in ICP susceptibility[34], as does the link to ABCB11 function through FXR/PLD2 signalling[35]. Another canalicular ATP-driven transporter, the multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2, encoded by the gene ABCC2(ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 2) is involved in bile formation. This protein exports bilirubin, some bile acids and many other anion conjugates into bile. Homozygous mutations of ABCC2 cause the rare liver disorder Dubin-Johnson syndrome, which presents with conjugated hyperbilirubinaemia[36]. Although common variation and ICP susceptibility have been investigated at this locus in population cohorts, with conflicting results[31,37,38], there are no published analyses of comprehensive sequencing of the coding region of ABCC2 in an ICP cohort. Familial forms of severe progressive cholestasis without a confirmed genetic diagnosis also exist[39]. Mutations of another gene, tight junction protein 2 (TJP2) have recently been implicated in some patients with such disease[40]. The encoded protein named zona occludens 2 (ZO-2) is a cytosolic component of a number of types of cell-cell junctions at many sites, interacting with membrane proteins and cytoskeletal proteins. The detergent actions of bile acids in the liver on mutated cellular junctions are postulated to cause the cholestatic phenotype[40]. To date this gene has not been studied in ICP. Given the role of other PFIC genes in ICP, TJP2 seems a reasonable candidate for analysis. To clarify the extent of involvement in ICP of these genes implicated in familial cholestasis we undertook high-throughput targeted sequencing of ABCB4, ABCB11, ATP8B1, ABCC2 and TJP2 in a cohort of 147 women with ICP.

Patients

The study included 147 women with a confirmed diagnosis of ICP, recruited through the Women’s Health Research Centre at Queen Charlotte’s and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS trust, St. Mary’s Hospital Imperial College London, and North Lincolnshire and Goole Hospitals NHS foundation trust. All patients provided written informed consent, conforming to the 1975 Helsinki guidelines; permission for the study was granted by the ethics committee of the Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust, London (references REC97/5197 and 08/H0707/21). ICP was diagnosed as described previously on the basis of clinical symptoms (pruritus without identifiable skin lesions other than excoriations) and routine laboratory investigations[33]. ICP was confirmed with detection of raised maternal serum bile acids. Women were excluded if viral or autoimmune hepatobiliary disease was diagnosed. A larger cohort of 545 patients with ICP, described in a previous study[31], was used to evaluate potential recurrent mutations.

Results

Genes implicated in familial cholestasis underwent targeted next-generation sequencing using the MiSeq platform in a cohort of 147 ICP patients. This identified 26 potentially pathogenic variations. Table 1 shows each variant identified together with its predicted protein consequence. Clinical findings for each patient in whom a potential mutation was identified are also shown (Table 2). All of the described mutations were observed in the heterozygous state and no patient harboured more than one potentially pathogenic variant. The frequency of two of the previously identified common susceptibility variants for ICP[31]; namely rs2109505 in ABCB4 and rs2287622 in ABCB11, was noted in these individuals (Table 1). All of the missense variants identified, except where specified (Table 1) were predicted to be pathogenic by SIFT and MutationTaster.
Table 1

Potential pathogenic variants identified in this study.

Patient DNA Change Predicted Protein Change Prediction pathogenic? Database ref rs2287622 rs2109505
ABCB4 1c.140G > Ap.Arg47Glnyrs372685632VAAT
2c.337A > Gp.Met113Valyrs757245592VAAA
3c.482A > Gp.Glu161GlyyNVVAAT
4c.523A > Gp.Thr175Alayrs58238559VAAA
5c.1583delAp.glu528glyfs*6yNVVATT
6c.1769G > Ap.Arg590Glnyrs45575636VVAT
7c.1801G > Tp.Ala601SeryNVAAAA
8c.2050G > Tp.Glu684TeryNVVVAA
9c.2165G > Cp.Gly722Alayrs779885518VVAT
10c.2324C > Tp.Tyr775Metyrs148052192VAAA
11c.2324C > Tp.Tyr775Metyrs148052192AAAA
12c.2561G > Ap.Trp854TeryNVVVAA
ABCB11 13c.890A > Gp.Glu297Glyyrs11568372AAAA
14c.890A > Gp.Glu297Glyyrs11568372VAAA
15c.890A > Gp.Glu297Glyyrs11568372AAAT
16c.2343 + 1G > TIntron 19 spliceyrs774411820AAAA
ATP8B1 17c.134A > Cp.Asn45Thryrs146599962AAAA
18c.134A > Cp.Asn45Thryrs146599962VVAA
19c.134A > Cp.Asn45Thryrs146599962VAAA
20c.340G > Cp.Glu114Glnyrs753142591VAAT
21c.607A > Gp.Lys203Gluyrs56355310VAAT
27 c.134A > C p.Asn45Thr y rs146599962 NT NT
28 c.134A > C p.Asn45Thr y rs146599962 NT NT
29 c.134A > C p.Asn45Thr y rs146599962 NT NT
ABCC2 22c.4055A > Cp.Glu1352AlayNVAAAT
23dupl. ex 24–25ins then Ter1esv3423829AAAA
TJP2 24c.185C > Tp.Thr62Mety/n 2rs138241615AAAA
25c.185C > Tp.Thr62Mety/n 2rs138241615VAAA
26c.1877C > Gp.Thr626Sery/n 2rs149911553AAAA

Notes: Individuals in italics were identified by second screen of larger cohort.

NV - novel variant not currently reported in dbSNP.

NT - not typed.

1 Insertion is out of frame.

2 SIFT predicts tolerated, mutation taster predicts disease causing.

rs2287622 shows amino acids at this SNP, rs2109505 is nucleotides (SNP is synonymous).

Table 2

Clinical and biochemical findings in the individuals with potential mutations.

PatientALTALPGGTBilirubinBile AcidsMaternal Biliary DiseaseF/H Biliary DiseaseAdverse pregnancy outcomes
ABCB4 13451592040 150 no no SPL, M
227204134 16 no no PPH
3452801812 39 no no no
435284NP6 30 no no no
51725222013 239 G G, ICP no
6291244188 39 G G no
718027101018 108 no ICP* M, FHR
858261NPNP 78 no G no
9579270NPNP 112 G G M, FHR
10115376287 44 no Cirr no
11776292NP57 50 G, C G, ICP FHR
1280320466NP 222 no G, Cirr no
ABCB11 13229238NP23 118 G, C nk SPL, M, FHR
1494190128 23 no no no
15NP9184 14 no no no
1632302114 44 G no NNU
ATP8B1 174103442916 27 no no PPH
181312473826 69 no no no
197072631720 120 G G FHR
20232273610 35 G G, Cirr no
2196261339 22 no no no
27 506 510 110 16 182 no G SPL
28 415 358 32 18 16 nk nk no
29 101 323 18 4 17 no no FHR
ABCC2 22142912311 66 no no no
2380257NP10 73 no G no
TJP2 24110178NP9 57 nk nk no
252254352617 42 no no SB
26740527NPNP 127 no no no

Individual in italics identified by second screen of larger cohort.

NP – not performed.

G – gallstones.

PPH - post partum haemorrage.

ALT - alanine transaminase.

C - oral contraceptive induced cholestasis.

SPL - spontaneous preterm labour (<37 weeks).

ALP - alkaline phosphatase.

ICP - intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

SB - still birth in previous pregnancy.

GGT - gamma glutamyl transferase.

Cirr - liver cirrhosis.

M - mecconium staining.

F/H - family history.

FHR - fetal heart rate abnormalities.

nk - not known.

NNU - > 48 hr admission to neonatal unit.

*- based on recollection of maternal aunt.

Potential pathogenic variants identified in this study. Notes: Individuals in italics were identified by second screen of larger cohort. NV - novel variant not currently reported in dbSNP. NT - not typed. 1 Insertion is out of frame. 2 SIFT predicts tolerated, mutation taster predicts disease causing. rs2287622 shows amino acids at this SNP, rs2109505 is nucleotides (SNP is synonymous). Clinical and biochemical findings in the individuals with potential mutations. Individual in italics identified by second screen of larger cohort. NP – not performed. G – gallstones. PPH - post partum haemorrage. ALT - alanine transaminase. C - oral contraceptive induced cholestasis. SPL - spontaneous preterm labour (<37 weeks). ALP - alkaline phosphatase. ICP - intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. SB - still birth in previous pregnancy. GGT - gamma glutamyl transferase. Cirr - liver cirrhosis. M - mecconium staining. F/H - family history. FHR - fetal heart rate abnormalities. nk - not known. NNU - > 48 hr admission to neonatal unit. *- based on recollection of maternal aunt.

ABCB4 variants

Consistent with previous findings[15], the largest number of potential mutations (11 different variants in 12 patients) were identified in the gene encoding the phosphatidyl choline floppase ABCB4 in this patient cohort (Table 1). Two predicted resulting variants, namely Thr175Ala and Arg590Gln, have previously been reported as pathogenic in cholestatic disease[41,42]. Three novel mutations are predicted to result in a frameshift leading to a stop codon six missense amino acids thereafter (Glu528Glyfs*6) and two immediate introductions of a premature stop codon (Glu684Ter, Trp854Ter), a type of mutation only very infrequently previously described in ICP[15]. The remaining 7 mutations are novel missense changes predicted to be pathogenic (Alamut).

ABCB11 variants

Fewer potentially pathogenic variants (n = 2, 4 patients) were identified in ABCB11, encoding the bile salt export pump. A recurrent mutation, predicted to yield the substitution Glu297Gly, first described in PFIC2 patients[27], and later identified in a study of ICP patients[29], was discovered in 3 separate patients not known to be related. A donor splice site mutation in intron 19 was identified with the predicted consequence of an exon skipping event. A missense variation, resulting in the protein change Asn591Ser (dbSNP: rs11568367), was identified in an additional patient, which has previously been reported in ICP[28]. However, despite this amino acid being highly conserved, bioinformatic tools predict the variation to be benign; this allele is also relatively common in the South Asian population (MAF 11%). Thus, it seems not likely to be a pathogenic variant.

ATP8B1 variants

Several variants of interest were identified in ATP8B1, encoding a phosphatidyl serine flippase. A mutation predicted to be pathogenic by SIFT and Mutation Taster, causing the protein change Asn45Thr, was seen in 3 unrelated individuals. Two further variants predicted to be pathogenic were identified in 2 additional patients, resulting in the protein changes Glu114Gln and Lys203Glu. To clarify the potential pathogenic and recurrent role (in ICP) of the Asn45Thr variant a cohort of 545 cases was screened for this change (see methods above); an additional 3 patients harbouring this variant were identified (Tables 1 and 2).

ABCC2 variants

Two significant alterations were identified in ABCC2, encoding MRP2, a transporter of conjugated bilirubin and other organic anions. A single missense substitution, predicted to result in the protein change Glu1352Ala was identified in one patient. Alamut analysis indicated that SIFT and mutationTaster both predict the change to be deleterious. A second identified DNA change, confirmed by RT-PCR dosage methodology, was a genomic duplication of 5299 base pairs, encompassing exons 24 and 25 of the gene and predicted to result in the insertion of a premature stop codon. This copy number variant has been reported once before (database reference esv3423829).

TJP2 variants

Three patients harboured TJP2 variants of potential interest. Two unrelated individuals had the same DNA mutation causing the protein change Thr62Met. This alteration is predicted to be disease causing by Mutation Taster; SIFT, however, predicts this change to be tolerated. A second missense alteration seen in one patient is predicted to cause the protein alteration Thr626Ser. This change is also assessed as tolerated by SIFT but as disease causing by Mutation Taster. 545 ICP cases (as above) were subsequently screened for the possible recurrent Thr62Met variant, however no further ICP cases carrying this change were identified.

Biochemical and clinical features of ICP cases with variants

Elevations in serum BA and alanine transaminase (ALT) activity values varied among patients and there was no particular trend for greater elevation of specific analytes in women with particular mutations in specific genes. Hyperbilirubinaemia was rare. It did, however, occur in association with ABCB4, ABCB11 or ATP8B1 variants. Six women had elevated bilirubin values (>20 µmol/L); all had severe ICP (serum BA > 40 µmol/L). The two whose bilirubin concentrations were consistent with jaundice (>35 µmol/L) harboured ABCB4 mutations. Only two women with mutations (one in ABCB4, one in ATP8B1) were known to have elevated gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels. Of the 26 women with a mutation in a biliary transporter (ABCB4, ABCB11, APT8B1, ABCC2), 12 (46%) had an established family history of biliary disease (ICP, cirrhosis or gallstones).

Discussion

This study is the largest analysis to date of the role of mutations of familial cholestasis genes in ICP susceptibility. Previous studies have identified genetic contributions to the disease primarily focussing on ABCB4. Here, by using a next generation sequencing approach, a panel of genes could be analysed in parallel in a large cohort of patients. Our analysis identified a number of mutations of ABCB4, encoding the phosphatidyl choline floppase MDR3. ABCB4 has been analysed in a number of ICP cohorts and mutations in this gene represent the largest overall genetic contribution to ICP susceptibility known to date[15]. Several groups have established functional assays for this protein that can incorporate mutant constructs[43-46]. Such assays help to define the impact of a given variant on protein function; bioinformatics predictors of clinical importance of variants like those used in this study are useful (and improving) but can never be conclusive. Functional assays are being used to classify mutations by mechanism of effect on protein function (e.g., trafficking defect resulting in mis-localisation, loss of floppase activity). This is of value in ABCB4-associated diseases; these data may predict response to therapy intended to rescue floppase function. It is noteworthy that in the ABCB4 mutant carrier group, 8/12 (67%) had a family history of biliary disease (ICP, cholelithiasis or cirrhosis) (Table 2). This is consistent with a study of parous women with LPAC and co-existing ABCB4 mutations, in which approximately 50% developed ICP when pregnant[47]. A clear role is now established for genetic variation in ABCB11 contributing to the aetiology of ICP, although one seemingly less than that of ABCB4. Our study has confirmed this role; taken together with other data, it suggests that up to 5% of ICP cases harbour a heterozygous mutation of ABCB11 [28-30]. In particular, the two mutant alleles found commonly in the PFIC2/BRIC2 population (Glu297Gly and Asp482Gly) are also present in the ICP population. Functional studies of ABCB11 mutations have been performed in addition to mini-gene construct splicing analysis and immunohistochemical studies to establish genotype/phenotype correlations[48-50]; studies of this type are helpful to clarify the clinical relevance of findings of unknown significance. Two of the five women in this group had cholelithiasis (Table 2). Previous studies of ICP patients and ABCB11 mutations have not identified this association. Analysis of ATP8B1 in ICP has been limited, with the largest study focussing on common SNPs and population risk rather than mutations [31-33]. In this study we confirmed a small potential role for ATP8B1 variants to contribute to ICP. We examined a larger ICP population for the recurrent variant (Asn45Thr) and identified three further individuals harbouring it. Taken with the other mutations identified in this gene, it is therefore possible that up to 3% of ICP patients may have a heterozygous mutation of ATP8B1. However, the Asn45Thr variant, although predicted to be deleterious, is fairly common in the normal population (global minor allele frequency 0.49%), and has been reported in a study of chronic pancreatitis[51]. Although this does not exclude this variant from having a mildly deleterious effect on protein function, in vitro experimental approaches are warranted to confirm if this variant contributes to disease risk. That our cohort included two patients with potentially pathogenic variants of ABCC2, a missense mutation predicted to be pathogenic and a large in-frame duplication, is of interest. No published studies report sequencing this gene in ICP; our data suggest a small but potentially overlooked contribution to ICP by heterozygous ABCC2 mutations. This study is the first to examine TJP2 in an ICP cohort. We have identified some evidence for involvement of this gene, with three occurrences of variants that may predispose to disease. However, as bioinformatics prediction tools did not agree on the clinical relevance of these changes, further analysis is warranted. Development of functional assays for this protein, together with further sequencing of TJP2 in larger patient cohorts, will be key to understanding the role of these variants. A spectrum of variants have been identified in this and other ICP cohorts. Although some variants will be predicted to have only a mild impact upon disease susceptibility, either from database predictions or using in vitro assays, the cholestatic impact of gestational elevations of reproductive hormones may result in a more severe phenotype in the context of pregnancy. Heterozygous mutations in the five genes sequenced were identified in nearly 20% of the ICP population being studied. However, the mutant-carrying groups exhibited no clear phenotypic differences (Table 2). Serum BA or ALT values did not vary by gene and raised serum GGT activity was not common in those with a mutation in ABCB4. Biomarkers that indicate which biliary transporter is mutated in a specific ICP patient thus remain to be found. That >50% of the women with identified variants had a family history of biliary disease is noteworthy; this information could be useful in a clinical setting to make decisions about mutation screening. Further studies with deeper phenotyping approaches (especially metabolic profiling/serum lipidomics and reproductive hormone metabolite analysis, based on our knowledge of disease pathophysiology) are warranted to determine if these mutation groups can be distinguished by clinical phenotype. Research into the impact of specific genotypes on drug response, risk of subsequent hepatobiliary disease, resolution of symptoms after delivery, duration of symptoms, and long term maternal and child health will be of particular value. In this study, we used a candidate sequencing approach to identify mutations with a potentially large impact on protein function. Separate studies have also taken a population genetics approach using candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms and/or tagging SNPs in an attempt to identify common variants that contribute to overall risk[31,38,52,53]. Common variants that make a much smaller contribution to disease risk in ICP populations have been identified at the ABCB4 and ABCB11 loci (in particular rs2109505 (ABCB4) and rs2287622/rs7577650 (ABCB11)[28,31,53]). Thus, the genetic architecture of ICP is complex, with rare mutant alleles, often but not exclusively specific to each patient, present in affected women, such as reported in this study, together with common variants at the same loci that represent risk alleles as we have previously described. Although our previous study excluded a large role for common variation of ATP8B1 and ABCC2 in ICP[31], studies in larger cohorts may identify variants conferring a small degree of risk (or protection), given the potential high-impact mutations of these genes identified by this study. Common variation around TJP2 causing small alterations in risk (which this study was not powered to detect) may also play a role. We have previously studied the role of FXR variants in ICP and identified a small number of rare variants with a functional effect[54]. When designing this study this gene was not included in the screening panel. However, the recent identification of FXR mutations in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis strengthen the case for further FXR analysis in future studies of ICP[55]. The catalogue of ICP-associated mutations that this analysis, and others, have established permits consideration of the possibility of precision genomic medicine. With sequencing costs falling and technology continuing to advance, to contemplate screening all of the candidate genes for ICP is now feasible, enabling genetic diagnosis that in future may allow better targeted treatment and surveillance.

Methods

Blood samples were collected in standard EDTA vacutainers and buffy coats were prepared by centrifugation using standard protocols. DNA was extracted from 200 µl of buffy coat using the Qiagen Blood mini kit (Crawley, UK). Extracted DNA was assessed for purity using an ND-1000 Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermofisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK) and quantified using a Qubit fluorimeter (Thermofisher). Selected genes known or hypothesized to be involved in ICP (ABCB4, ABCB11, ATP8B1, ABCC2 and TJP2) underwent targeted next-generation sequencing. Oligonucleotides (“oligos”) to screen the entire coding region of each gene were designed using the Illumina web-based sequencing assay design tool Design Studio (http://designstudio.illumina.com/) and used in the Illumina TruSeq custom amplicon v1.5 workflow according to the manufacturer’s instructions. This workflow has three main stages: 1) hybridisation of the oligos to 50 ng/µl of genomic DNA; 2) extension and ligation of the oligos; 3) PCR amplification using two unique index primers for sample. Afterwards, sample DNA concentrations were normalised using the Illumina bead-based system and pooled in a final library. The pooled library was then sequenced using a MiSeq Reagent Kit v2, 300-cycle (2 × 150bp), on the MiSeq benchtop sequencing platform (Illumina, Cambridge, UK). Sequencing data were analysed using a bioinformatics pipeline designed in Biomedical Genomic Workbench 2.5.1 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark). Sequence reads were mapped against the human reference (hg19/GRCh37). Variants were called when they had a minimum coverage of 20× and a probability of 80% of being different from the reference, in accordance with the Bayesian model incorporated into the software. Putative variants identified were filtered according to the quality and the frequency of occurrence; all changes having an allele read frequency of less than 10% and an average base quality (Phred score) of less than 20 were removed. The variants identified were further annotated using dbSNP v139 and the 1000 Genome Project database. A deeper investigation was also performed using Alamut Visual 2.7.1 (Interactive Biosoftware, Rouen, France), in which each variant was integrated with allele frequency information derived from several single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) databases, including dbSNP v144, the 1000 Genomes Project, the Exome Aggregation Consortium and the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Grand Opportunity Exome Sequencing Project and with in silico missense predictions from SIFT (sorting intolerant from tolerant) and MutationTaster. Copy number variants (CNVs) were detected via in-house dosage analysis using the read-counts generated by the NGS analysis. The CNVs were confirmed by RT-PCR using Universal Probe Library (Roche). Each potential pathogenic variant was confirmed in patient samples using routine Sanger sequencing. Forward and reverse primers were manually designed for the flanking regions and purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (sequences available on request). Analysis of potential recurrent mutations of ATP8B1 and TJP2 were performed following primer design (“Primer picker”, LGC Genomics, Hoddesdon, UK) using a competitive allele specific PCR SNP system using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) quencher cassette oligonucleotides (KASPTM, LGC Genomics).

Data Availability

Any further information on the sequencing data described in this paper is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
  55 in total

Review 1.  Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a critical review.

Authors:  D G Palmer; J Eads
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.638

2.  Sequence variation in the ATP8B1 gene and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

Authors:  Jodie N Painter; Miia Savander; Anne Ropponen; Nina Nupponen; Seija Riikonen; Olavi Ylikorkala; Anna-Elina Lehesjoki; Kristiina Aittomäki
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  The metabolic profile of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is associated with impaired glucose tolerance, dyslipidemia, and increased fetal growth.

Authors:  Marcus G Martineau; Christina Raker; Peter H Dixon; Jenny Chambers; Mavis Machirori; Nicole M King; Melissa L Hooks; Ramya Manoharan; Kenneth Chen; Raymond Powrie; Catherine Williamson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Heterozygous MDR3 missense mutation associated with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: evidence for a defect in protein trafficking.

Authors:  P H Dixon; N Weerasekera; K J Linton; O Donaldson; J Chambers; E Egginton; J Weaver; C Nelson-Piercy; M de Swiet; G Warnes; E Elias; C F Higgins; D G Johnston; M I McCarthy; C Williamson
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Genotype-phenotype relationships in the low-phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis syndrome: a study of 156 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Raoul Poupon; Olivier Rosmorduc; Pierre Yves Boëlle; Yves Chrétien; Christophe Corpechot; Olivier Chazouillères; Chantal Housset; Véronique Barbu
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  Familial recurrent intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a genetic study providing evidence for transmission of a sex-limited, dominant trait.

Authors:  R T Holzbach; D A Sivak; W E Braun
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  ABCB4 mutations underlie hormonal cholestasis but not pediatric idiopathic gallstones.

Authors:  Milan Jirsa; Jiří Bronský; Lenka Dvořáková; Jan Šperl; Vít Šmajstrla; Jiří Horák; Jiří Nevoral; Martin Hřebíček
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Prevalence of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in Chile.

Authors:  H Reyes; M C Gonzalez; J Ribalta; H Aburto; C Matus; G Schramm; R Katz; E Medina
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Complementary functions of the flippase ATP8B1 and the floppase ABCB4 in maintaining canalicular membrane integrity.

Authors:  Annemiek Groen; Marta Rodriguez Romero; Cindy Kunne; Sarah J Hoosdally; Peter H Dixon; Carol Wooding; Catherine Williamson; Jurgen Seppen; Karin Van den Oever; Kam S Mok; Coen C Paulusma; Kenneth J Linton; Ronald P J Oude Elferink
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  A comprehensive analysis of common genetic variation around six candidate loci for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

Authors:  Peter H Dixon; Christopher A Wadsworth; Jennifer Chambers; Jennifer Donnelly; Sharon Cooley; Rebecca Buckley; Ramona Mannino; Sheba Jarvis; Argyro Syngelaki; Victoria Geenes; Priyadarshini Paul; Meera Sothinathan; Ralf Kubitz; Frank Lammert; Rachel M Tribe; Chin Lye Ch'ng; Hanns-Ulrich Marschall; Anna Glantz; Shahid A Khan; Kypros Nicolaides; John Whittaker; Michael Geary; Catherine Williamson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Liver Diseases in the Perinatal Period: Interactions Between Mother and Infant.

Authors:  Samar H Ibrahim; Maureen M Jonas; Sarah A Taylor; Luz Helena Gutierrez Sanchez; Jaqueline L Wolf; Shikha S Sundaram
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  GWAS meta-analysis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy implicates multiple hepatic genes and regulatory elements.

Authors:  Peter H Dixon; Adam P Levine; Inês Cebola; Daniel P Gale; Catherine Williamson; Melanie M Y Chan; Aliya S Amin; Anshul Aich; Monika Mozere; Hannah Maude; Alice L Mitchell; Jun Zhang; Jenny Chambers; Argyro Syngelaki; Jennifer Donnelly; Sharon Cooley; Michael Geary; Kypros Nicolaides; Malin Thorsell; William M Hague; Maria Cecilia Estiu; Hanns-Ulrich Marschall
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 17.694

3.  ZO-2 favors Hippo signaling, and its re-expression in the steatotic liver by AMPK restores junctional sealing.

Authors:  Laura González-González; Helios Gallego-Gutiérrez; Dolores Martin-Tapia; José Everardo Avelino-Cruz; Christian Hernández-Guzmán; Sergio Israel Rangel-Guerrero; Luis Marat Alvarez-Salas; Erika Garay; Bibiana Chávez-Munguía; María Concepción Gutiérrez-Ruiz; Dinorah Hernández-Melchor; Esther López-Bayghen; Lorenza González-Mariscal
Journal:  Tissue Barriers       Date:  2021-10-23

4.  Autoinhibition and regulation by phosphoinositides of ATP8B1, a human lipid flippase associated with intrahepatic cholestatic disorders.

Authors:  Sara Abad Herrera; Michelle Juknaviciute Laursen; Thibaud Dieudonné; Maylis Lejeune; Charlott Stock; Kahina Slimani; Christine Jaxel; Joseph A Lyons; Cédric Montigny; Thomas Günther Pomorski; Poul Nissen; Guillaume Lenoir
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 8.713

5.  Effect of a Common Genetic Variant (p.V444A) in the Bile Salt Export Pump on the Inhibition of Bile Acid Transport by Cholestatic Medications.

Authors:  Izna Ali; Seher Khalid; Bruno Stieger; Kim L R Brouwer
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Detection of additional abnormalities or co-morbidities in women with suspected intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

Authors:  Frances Conti-Ramsden; Michael McEwan; Rachel Hill; Julie Wade; Georgina Abraham; Olivia Buckeldee; Catherine Williamson; Caroline L Knight; Joanna Girling; Lucy C Chappell
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2019-09-02

7.  Pharmacological interventions for treating intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

Authors:  Kate F Walker; Lucy C Chappell; William M Hague; Philippa Middleton; Jim G Thornton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-27

8.  Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 4 in an Indian child: presentation, initial course and novel compound heterozygous mutation.

Authors:  Nida Mirza; Ravi Bharadwaj; Smita Malhotra; Anupam Sibal
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-07-06

Review 9.  Molecular Pathogenesis of Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy.

Authors:  Jianping Xiao; Zeying Li; Yutong Song; Yujie Sun; Hanfei Shi; Daozhen Chen; Yan Zhang
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-05-30

Review 10.  Jaundice revisited: recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of inherited cholestatic liver diseases.

Authors:  Huey-Ling Chen; Shang-Hsin Wu; Shu-Hao Hsu; Bang-Yu Liou; Hui-Ling Chen; Mei-Hwei Chang
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 8.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.