Literature DB >> 28924053

Prospective observational study to evaluate the performance of the BioSure HIV Self-Test in the hands of lay users.

John Saunders1, Nataliya Brima1, Marzena Orzol1, Laura Phillips1, Ana Milinkovic1, Gary Carpenter2, Andrew Copas1, Richard Gilson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In order to assess whether the BioSure HIV Self-Test could be reliably performed by users at home and to determine whether they were able to perform and correctly interpret the test, we carried out an evaluation study among attendees at a sexual health service.
METHODS: A prospective observational study of clinic attendees to determine their ability to follow the instructions, complete the test on themselves and correctly interpret the results. The evaluation included interpretation of three dummy (contrived) devices, chosen at random from a sample of 12 devices, to ensure that a sufficient number of all possible test outcomes were included.
RESULTS: Two hundred participants were recruited. 97.0% (95% CI 93.5 to 98.9) conducted the test so as to achieve a valid result. 99.5% correctly identified the test result. Participants correctly interpreted the result of 94.0% (95% CI 91.4 to 95.9) of 586 contrived devices.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of participants were able to follow the instructions and perform the test in order to get a valid result. Interpretation of the test results was good and the majority of participants were able to correctly read the result of their own and contrived tests. The availability of HIV self-tests will provide another option to increase access to testing particularly for those who may not wish or are unable to access clinical services. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIV; HIV testing; diagnosis; reproductive health; sexual behaviour

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28924053     DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  5 in total

1.  Verification of HIV Self-Testing Use and Results: A Global Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kadija M Tahlil; Jason J Ong; Nora E Rosenberg; Weiming Tang; Donaldson F Conserve; Susan Nkengasong; Kathryn E Muessig; Juliet Iwelunmor; Oliver Ezechi; Titi Gbaja-Biamila; Sani H Aliyu; Chisom Obiezu-Umeh; Bill Kapogiannis; Joseph D Tucker
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.078

2.  Experiences of and attitudes towards HIV testing for Asian, Black and Latin American men who have sex with men (MSM) in the SELPHI (HIV Self-Testing Public Health Intervention) randomized controlled trial in England and Wales: implications for HIV self-testing.

Authors:  Emily Jay Nicholls; Phil Samba; Leanne McCabe; Mitzy Gafos; Andrew N Philips; Roy Trevelion; Alison J Rodger; Fiona M Burns; Peter Weatherburn; T Charles Witzel
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.135

3.  Reliability of HIV rapid diagnostic tests for self-testing compared with testing by health-care workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carmen Figueroa; Cheryl Johnson; Nathan Ford; Anita Sands; Shona Dalal; Robyn Meurant; Irena Prat; Karin Hatzold; Willy Urassa; Rachel Baggaley
Journal:  Lancet HIV       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 12.767

4.  Law, human rights and gender in practice: an analysis of lessons from implementation of self-care interventions for sexual and reproductive health.

Authors:  Laura Ferguson; Manjulaa Narasimhan; Jose Gutierrez; William Jardell; Sofia Gruskin
Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2021

5.  Usability and Acceptability of Home-based Self-testing for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Antibodies for Population Surveillance.

Authors:  Christina Atchison; Philippa Pristerà; Emily Cooper; Vasiliki Papageorgiou; Rozlyn Redd; Maria Piggin; Barnaby Flower; Gianluca Fontana; Sutha Satkunarajah; Hutan Ashrafian; Anna Lawrence-Jones; Lenny Naar; Jennifer Chigwende; Steve Gibbard; Steven Riley; Ara Darzi; Paul Elliott; Deborah Ashby; Wendy Barclay; Graham S Cooke; Helen Ward
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 9.079

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.