Literature DB >> 28924011

Contralateral Bias of High Spatial Frequency Tuning and Cardinal Direction Selectivity in Mouse Visual Cortex.

Kirstie J Salinas1, Dario X Figueroa Velez1, Jack H Zeitoun1, Hyungtae Kim1, Sunil P Gandhi2,3.   

Abstract

Binocular mechanisms for visual processing are thought to enhance spatial acuity by combining matched input from the two eyes. Studies in the primary visual cortex of carnivores and primates have confirmed that eye-specific neuronal response properties are largely matched. In recent years, the mouse has emerged as a prominent model for binocular visual processing, yet little is known about the spatial frequency tuning of binocular responses in mouse visual cortex. Using calcium imaging in awake mice of both sexes, we show that the spatial frequency preference of cortical responses to the contralateral eye is ∼35% higher than responses to the ipsilateral eye. Furthermore, we find that neurons in binocular visual cortex that respond only to the contralateral eye are tuned to higher spatial frequencies. Binocular neurons that are well matched in spatial frequency preference are also matched in orientation preference. In contrast, we observe that binocularly mismatched cells are more mismatched in orientation tuning. Furthermore, we find that contralateral responses are more direction-selective than ipsilateral responses and are strongly biased to the cardinal directions. The contralateral bias of high spatial frequency tuning was found in both awake and anesthetized recordings. The distinct properties of contralateral cortical responses may reflect the functional segregation of direction-selective, high spatial frequency-preferring neurons in earlier stages of the central visual pathway. Moreover, these results suggest that the development of binocularity and visual acuity may engage distinct circuits in the mouse visual system.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Seeing through two eyes is thought to improve visual acuity by enhancing sensitivity to fine edges. Using calcium imaging of cellular responses in awake mice, we find surprising asymmetries in the spatial processing of eye-specific visual input in binocular primary visual cortex. The contralateral visual pathway is tuned to higher spatial frequencies than the ipsilateral pathway. At the highest spatial frequencies, the contralateral pathway strongly prefers to respond to visual stimuli along the cardinal (horizontal and vertical) axes. These results suggest that monocular, and not binocular, mechanisms set the limit of spatial acuity in mice. Furthermore, they suggest that the development of visual acuity and binocularity in mice involves different circuits.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/3710125-14$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binocularity; orientation selectivity; primary visual cortex; spatial frequency selectivity; two-photon calcium imaging; visual acuity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28924011      PMCID: PMC5647770          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1484-17.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  80 in total

1.  Behavioral assessment of visual acuity in mice and rats.

Authors:  G T Prusky; P W West; R M Douglas
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The effect of binocular stimulation on each component of transient and steady-state VEPs.

Authors:  S Tobimatsu; M Kato
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-05

3.  Binocularity in the human visual evoked potential: facilitation, summation and suppression.

Authors:  P A Apkarian; K Nakayama; C W Tyler
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-01

4.  Binocular interaction and steady-state visual evoked potentials. I. A study in normal subjects and in subjects with defective binocular vision.

Authors:  B Bagolini; V Porciatti; B Falsini
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. II. Orientation specificity and ocular dominance.

Authors:  P H Schiller; B L Finlay; S F Volman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Retinotopic organization of striate and extrastriate visual cortex in the mouse.

Authors:  E Wagor; N J Mangini; A L Pearlman
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1980-09-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Modulation of visual responses by behavioral state in mouse visual cortex.

Authors:  Cristopher M Niell; Michael P Stryker
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Enhanced Spatial Resolution During Locomotion and Heightened Attention in Mouse Primary Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Patrick J Mineault; Elaine Tring; Joshua T Trachtenberg; Dario L Ringach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Visual acuity development and plasticity in the absence of sensory experience.

Authors:  Erin Kang; Severine Durand; Jocelyn J LeBlanc; Takao K Hensch; Chinfei Chen; Michela Fagiolini
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Binocular integration in the mouse lateral geniculate nuclei.

Authors:  Michael Howarth; Lauren Walmsley; Timothy M Brown
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  16 in total

1.  Long-term Monocular Deprivation during Juvenile Critical Period Disrupts Binocular Integration in Mouse Visual Thalamus.

Authors:  Carey Y L Huh; Karim Abdelaal; Kirstie J Salinas; Diyue Gu; Jack Zeitoun; Dario X Figueroa Velez; John P Peach; Charless C Fowlkes; Sunil P Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Thalamocortical Circuits and Functional Architecture.

Authors:  Jens Kremkow; Jose-Manuel Alonso
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 6.422

3.  Distinct Circuits for Recovery of Eye Dominance and Acuity in Murine Amblyopia.

Authors:  Céleste-Élise Stephany; Xiaokuang Ma; Hilary M Dorton; Jie Wu; Alexander M Solomon; Michael G Frantz; Shenfeng Qiu; Aaron W McGee
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  A Model for Neural Network Modeling in Neuroscience.

Authors:  Katherine R Storrs; Guido Maiello
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Existing function in primary visual cortex is not perturbed by new skill acquisition of a non-matched sensory task.

Authors:  Brian B Jeon; Thomas Fuchs; Steven M Chase; Sandra J Kuhlman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  The Development of Receptive Field Tuning Properties in Mouse Binocular Primary Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Liming Tan; Dario L Ringach; Joshua T Trachtenberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 6.709

7.  Natural image and receptive field statistics predict saccade sizes.

Authors:  Jason M Samonds; Wilson S Geisler; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Functional Differentiation of Mouse Visual Cortical Areas Depends upon Early Binocular Experience.

Authors:  Kirstie J Salinas; Carey Y L Huh; Jack H Zeitoun; Sunil P Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 6.709

Review 9.  Portrait of visual cortical circuits for generating neural oscillation dynamics.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Xiaohui Zhang
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 5.082

10.  Distinct Laminar Requirements for NMDA Receptors in Experience-Dependent Visual Cortical Plasticity.

Authors:  Ming-Fai Fong; Peter Sb Finnie; Taekeun Kim; Aurore Thomazeau; Eitan S Kaplan; Samuel F Cooke; Mark F Bear
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.