Literature DB >> 28923917

Extinction risk is most acute for the world's largest and smallest vertebrates.

William J Ripple1, Christopher Wolf2, Thomas M Newsome2,3,4,5, Michael Hoffmann6,7, Aaron J Wirsing5, Douglas J McCauley8.   

Abstract

Extinction risk in vertebrates has been linked to large body size, but this putative relationship has only been explored for select taxa, with variable results. Using a newly assembled and taxonomically expansive database, we analyzed the relationships between extinction risk and body mass (27,647 species) and between extinction risk and range size (21,294 species) for vertebrates across six main classes. We found that the probability of being threatened was positively and significantly related to body mass for birds, cartilaginous fishes, and mammals. Bimodal relationships were evident for amphibians, reptiles, and bony fishes. Most importantly, a bimodal relationship was found across all vertebrates such that extinction risk changes around a body mass breakpoint of 0.035 kg, indicating that the lightest and heaviest vertebrates have elevated extinction risk. We also found range size to be an important predictor of the probability of being threatened, with strong negative relationships across nearly all taxa. A review of the drivers of extinction risk revealed that the heaviest vertebrates are most threatened by direct killing by humans. By contrast, the lightest vertebrates are most threatened by habitat loss and modification stemming especially from pollution, agricultural cropping, and logging. Our results offer insight into halting the ongoing wave of vertebrate extinctions by revealing the vulnerability of large and small taxa, and identifying size-specific threats. Moreover, they indicate that, without intervention, anthropogenic activities will soon precipitate a double truncation of the size distribution of the world's vertebrates, fundamentally reordering the structure of life on our planet.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biodiversity; body mass; exploitation; extinction; habitat

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28923917      PMCID: PMC5635868          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1702078114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  34 in total

1.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.

Authors:  N Myers; R A Mittermeier; C G Mittermeier; G A da Fonseca; J Kent
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Eating up the world's food web and the human trophic level.

Authors:  Sylvain Bonhommeau; Laurent Dubroca; Olivier Le Pape; Julien Barde; David M Kaplan; Emmanuel Chassot; Anne-Elise Nieblas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Status and ecological effects of the world's largest carnivores.

Authors:  William J Ripple; James A Estes; Robert L Beschta; Christopher C Wilmers; Euan G Ritchie; Mark Hebblewhite; Joel Berger; Bodil Elmhagen; Mike Letnic; Michael P Nelson; Oswald J Schmitz; Douglas W Smith; Arian D Wallach; Aaron J Wirsing
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Assessing the effects of large mobile predators on ecosystem connectivity.

Authors:  Douglas J McCauley; Hillary S Young; Robert B Dunbar; James A Estes; Brice X Semmens; Fiorenza Micheli
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.657

Review 5.  The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection.

Authors:  S L Pimm; C N Jenkins; R Abell; T M Brooks; J L Gittleman; L N Joppa; P H Raven; C M Roberts; J O Sexton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Policy: Marine biodiversity needs more than protection.

Authors:  Ray Hilborn
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Marine defaunation: animal loss in the global ocean.

Authors:  Douglas J McCauley; Malin L Pinsky; Stephen R Palumbi; James A Estes; Francis H Joyce; Robert R Warner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Bushmeat hunting and extinction risk to the world's mammals.

Authors:  William J Ripple; Katharine Abernethy; Matthew G Betts; Guillaume Chapron; Rodolfo Dirzo; Mauro Galetti; Taal Levi; Peter A Lindsey; David W Macdonald; Brian Machovina; Thomas M Newsome; Carlos A Peres; Arian D Wallach; Christopher Wolf; Hillary Young
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Human population density and extinction risk in the world's carnivores.

Authors:  Marcel Cardillo; Andy Purvis; Wes Sechrest; John L Gittleman; Jon Bielby; Georgina M Mace
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Gray wolves as climate change buffers in Yellowstone.

Authors:  Christopher C Wilmers; Wayne M Getz
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  47 in total

1.  No evidence that extinction risk increases in the largest and smallest vertebrates.

Authors:  Daniel Pincheira-Donoso; Dave J Hodgson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Reply to Pincheira-Donoso and Hodgson: Both the largest and smallest vertebrates have elevated extinction risk.

Authors:  William J Ripple; Christopher Wolf; Thomas M Newsome; Michael Hoffmann; Aaron J Wirsing; Douglas J McCauley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Extinction risk in extant marine species integrating palaeontological and biodistributional data.

Authors:  K S Collins; S M Edie; G Hunt; K Roy; D Jablonski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Quantifying anthropogenic threats to orchids using the IUCN Red List.

Authors:  Jenna Wraith; Catherine Pickering
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Exceptional body size-extinction risk relations shed new light on the freshwater biodiversity crisis.

Authors:  Gregor Kalinkat; Sonja C Jähnig; Jonathan M Jeschke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Reply to Kalinkat et al.: Smallest terrestrial vertebrates are highly imperiled.

Authors:  William J Ripple; Christopher Wolf; Thomas M Newsome; Michael Hoffmann; Aaron J Wirsing; Douglas J McCauley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Forest-type specialization strongly predicts avian responses to tropical agriculture.

Authors:  Jacob B Socolar; David S Wilcove
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Bias, incompleteness and the 'known unknowns' in the Holocene faunal record.

Authors:  Jennifer J Crees; Ben Collen; Samuel T Turvey
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Where the wild things were: intrinsic and extrinsic extinction predictors in the world's most depleted mammal fauna.

Authors:  Samuel T Turvey; Clare Duncan; Nathan S Upham; Xavier Harrison; Liliana M Dávalos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Clarifying the relationship between body size and extinction risk in amphibians by complete mapping of model space.

Authors:  Marcel Cardillo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.