BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Uremic pruritus in patients on hemodialysis is associated with depression, lower quality of life, and mortality. We studied the prevalence, awareness, and treatment of pruritus to assess how well this important condition is currently managed internationally. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Data from 35,452 patients on hemodialysis in up to 17 countries from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study were analyzed to describe pruritus prevalence from 1996 to 2015. Data from 6256 patients and 268 medical directors in 17 countries in 2012-2015 were analyzed to describe predictors, effects, medical directors' awareness, and treatment of pruritus. RESULTS: Patients very much or extremely bothered by itching declined from 28% in 1996 to 18% in 2015. In 2012-2015, among patients nearly always or always bothered by itching, pruritus had a major effect on work and social life; 18% used no treatment for pruritus, and 17% did not report itching to health care staff. In total, 69% of medical directors underestimated the prevalence of pruritus in their unit. Managing high serum phosphorus and low Kt/V was ranked as the most important intervention, but no relationship was found between these factors and pruritus; 57% of medical directors used oral antihistamines for first-line chronic treatment of pruritus. Gabapentin was used by 45% as first-, second-, or third-line treatment. Nalfurafine was only used in Japan. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of pruritus in people on hemodialysis is decreasing but remains underestimated. Large numbers of patients on hemodialysis with severe pruritus do not receive treatment. There is wide variation in the use of unlicensed medications for the treatment of pruritus. These data provide a benchmark for initiatives to improve the management of uremic pruritus. MULTIMEDIA: This article contains multimedia at https://vimeo.com/49458473This article contains multimedia at vimeo.com/49455976.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Uremic pruritus in patients on hemodialysis is associated with depression, lower quality of life, and mortality. We studied the prevalence, awareness, and treatment of pruritus to assess how well this important condition is currently managed internationally. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Data from 35,452 patients on hemodialysis in up to 17 countries from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study were analyzed to describe pruritus prevalence from 1996 to 2015. Data from 6256 patients and 268 medical directors in 17 countries in 2012-2015 were analyzed to describe predictors, effects, medical directors' awareness, and treatment of pruritus. RESULTS: Patients very much or extremely bothered by itching declined from 28% in 1996 to 18% in 2015. In 2012-2015, among patients nearly always or always bothered by itching, pruritus had a major effect on work and social life; 18% used no treatment for pruritus, and 17% did not report itching to health care staff. In total, 69% of medical directors underestimated the prevalence of pruritus in their unit. Managing high serum phosphorus and low Kt/V was ranked as the most important intervention, but no relationship was found between these factors and pruritus; 57% of medical directors used oral antihistamines for first-line chronic treatment of pruritus. Gabapentin was used by 45% as first-, second-, or third-line treatment. Nalfurafine was only used in Japan. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of pruritus in people on hemodialysis is decreasing but remains underestimated. Large numbers of patients on hemodialysis with severe pruritus do not receive treatment. There is wide variation in the use of unlicensed medications for the treatment of pruritus. These data provide a benchmark for initiatives to improve the management of uremic pruritus. MULTIMEDIA: This article contains multimedia at https://vimeo.com/49458473This article contains multimedia at vimeo.com/49455976.
Authors: Vandana S Mathur; Jill Lindberg; Michael Germain; Geoffrey Block; James Tumlin; Mark Smith; Mandeep Grewal; Dawn McGuire Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-06-17 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Ronald L Pisoni; Brenda W Gillespie; David M Dickinson; Kenneth Chen; Michael H Kutner; Robert A Wolfe Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Alexandru D P Papoiu; Nichole M Emerson; Tejesh S Patel; Robert A Kraft; Rodrigo Valdes-Rodriguez; Leigh A Nattkemper; Robert C Coghill; Gil Yosipovitch Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2014-06-18 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Jieling Chen; Lingling Liu; Jing Chen; Marques S N Ng; Vivian W Q Lou; Bibo Wu; Weijie Jiang; Yanqing Jie; Jingfen Zhu; Yaping He Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Victoria Alikari; Maria Tsironi; Vasiliki Matziou; Foteini Tzavella; John Stathoulis; Fotoula Babatsikou; Evangelos Fradelos; Sofia Zyga Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-09-03 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Nidhi Sukul; Elodie Speyer; Charlotte Tu; Brian A Bieber; Yun Li; Antonio A Lopes; Koichi Asahi; Laura Mariani; Maurice Laville; Hugh C Rayner; Bénédicte Stengel; Bruce M Robinson; Ronald L Pisoni Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-04-11 Impact factor: 8.237