Literature DB >> 28923698

Trends of inguinal hernia repairs performed for recurrence in the United States.

Brittany L Murphy1, Daniel S Ubl2, Jianying Zhang3, Elizabeth B Habermann2, David R Farley4, Keith Paley5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the main complications of inguinal hernia repair continues to be recurrence. Commonly cited prior reports from relatively small studies estimate this rate to be 1% to 5% in the United States. Although some reports have found higher recurrence rates, they get little attention on the national stage or in other large studies. We sought to determine the trend of inguinal hernia repairs performed for recurrence over time using large national databases.
METHODS: We identified patients aged ≥18 years who underwent inguinal hernia repair from three sources: the Premier database (January 2010 to September 2015), the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (January 2005 to December 2014), and the Mayo Clinic institutions (January 2005 to December 2014). We evaluated the incidence of primary and recurrent inguinal hernia repairs stratified by sex over time using one-tailed Cochran-Armitage tests.
RESULTS: In the Premier database, of the 317,636 inguinal hernia repairs, the proportion performed for recurrence had a small decrease in males from 11.4% in 2010 to 10.5% in 2015 (P < .0001); however, it remained constant in females (6.5% in 2010 to 6.7% in 2015, P = .46). In the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, of the 180,512 inguinal hernia repairs, there was no change for either sex: 10.5% to 11.2% (2005-2014, P = .12) in males and 6.2% to 7.1% (2005-2014, P = .11) in females. Within our institution, in the 9,216 patients identified, there was no change in the proportion of inguinal hernia repairs for recurrence in males: 13.3% to 11.5% (2005-2014, P = .25). In females, the proportion increased from 1.3% to 12.0% during the study period (P = .006).
CONCLUSION: Based on these larger evaluations of recurrent inguinal hernia surgery, the current literature on inguinal hernia repair recurrence is skewed and overly optimistic.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28923698     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  9 in total

1.  Mesh erosion into urinary bladder, rare condition but important to know.

Authors:  J Li; T Cheng
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Shouldice standard 2020: review of the current literature and results of an international consensus meeting.

Authors:  R Lorenz; G Arlt; J Conze; R Fortelny; J Gorjanc; A Koch; J Morrison; V Oprea; G Campanelli
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Pure tissue repairs: a timely and critical revival.

Authors:  R Bendavid; M Mainprize; Vladimir Iakovlev
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Proportion of femoral hernia repairs performed for recurrence in the United States.

Authors:  B L Murphy; D S Ubl; J Zhang; E B Habermann; D Farley; K Paley
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Trends in the use of patient-reported outcome measures for inguinal hernia repair: a quantitative systematic review.

Authors:  A Gram-Hanssen; M L Jessen; C Christophersen; D Zetner; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Inguinal hernia repair in Spain. A population-based study of 263,283 patients: factors associated with the choice of laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  S Guillaumes; C Hoyuela; N J Hidalgo; M Juvany; I Bachero; J Ardid; A Martrat; M Trias
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  A Classification System Specific for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia Following Open Hernia Surgery.

Authors:  Naotaka Yamaguchi; Daisuke Morioka; Yusuke Izumisawa; Junya Toyoda; Kazuya Yamaguchi; Nobutoshi Horii; Norio Ohyama; Fumio Asano; Masaru Miura; Ryusei Matsuyama; Yoshiki Sato; Itaru Endo
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Association of Mesh and Fixation Options with Reoperation Risk after Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Surgery: A Swedish Hernia Registry Study of 25,190 Totally Extraperitoneal and Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repairs.

Authors:  Bengt Novik; Gabriel Sandblom; Christoph Ansorge; Anders Thorell
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 6.532

9.  Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional high-definition laparoscopy in transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Hanna E Koppatz; Jukka I Harju; Jukka E Sirén; Panu J Mentula; Tom M Scheinin; Ville J Sallinen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.