Literature DB >> 28923458

Does self-consciousness of appearance influence postoperative satisfaction in rhinoplasty?

J M Herruer1, J B Prins2, N van Heerbeek3, G W J A Verhage-Damen3, K J A O Ingels3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Facial plastic surgeons and patients benefit from knowledge about how psychological aspects can influence the outcome of cosmetic surgery. The influence of preoperative self-consciousness of appearance and its effect on benefit after surgery in rhinoplasty patients has not been explored before in other studies.
METHOD: A prospective study was conducted on patients undergoing (septo)rhinoplasty for a combination of cosmetic and functional problems. Before the operation subjects were asked to complete two questionnaires, the Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS59) to measure distress associated with self-consciousness of appearance and the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) to measure satisfaction with their nose. Three months after surgery, they were asked to complete the ROE again and the Glasgow Benefit Inventory to measure benefit of the surgery in daily life. Scores of the pre- and postoperative questionnaires were analyzed and compared. Statistical analysis was performed to determine change after surgery and correlations between the scores.
SUBJECTS: Fifty-five consecutive patients undergoing (septo)rhinoplasty received a letter in which they were asked to participate in the study. Thirty-three patients completed both pre- and postoperative questionnaires. Their mean age was 28 years. MAIN
FINDINGS: Patient satisfaction improved significantly after the surgery. Lower self-consciousness of appearance before surgery was positively correlated with more benefit after the surgery and a greater change in patient satisfaction with their nose. Males have a lower benefit scores than females.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients seeking rhinoplasty have more distress associated with self-consciousness of appearance than a general unconcerned population. They can benefit a lot from a well-executed procedure. A significant improvement in quality of life can be achieved by rhinoplasty. Although males are equally satisfied as females, they benefit less from the surgery in daily life.
Copyright © 2017 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benefit; Quality of life; Rhinoplasty; Self-consciousness of appearance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28923458     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  8 in total

1.  A systematic review of body image measures for people diagnosed with head and neck cancer (HNC).

Authors:  Chindhu Shunmuga Sundaram; Haryana M Dhillon; Phyllis N Butow; Puma Sundaresan; Claudia Rutherford
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Discrepancy of the subjective perception of the nasal appearance between independent individuals and patients undergoing functional rhinoplasty (fRPL).

Authors:  Marleen Heiming; Eleftherios Savvas; Claudia Rudack; Markus Stenner; Christoph Spiekermann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Patient-reported Outcomes in Facial Reconstruction: Assessment of FACE-Q Scales and Predictors of Satisfaction.

Authors:  Adekunle Elegbede; Sara Mermulla; Silviu C Diaconu; Colton McNichols; Yuanyuan Liang; Fan Liang; Yvonne M Rasko; Michael P Grant; Arthur J Nam
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-12-05

4.  Satisfaction in Patients After Rhinoplasty Using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire.

Authors:  Nasir Khan; Mamoon Rashid; Ibrahim Khan; Saad Ur Rehman Sarwar; Haroon Ur Rashid; Mariam Khurshid; Usama Khalid Choudry; Noor Fatima
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-07-30

5.  Tip Droop Prevention in Rhinoplasty: Dynamic Effect of Strut Graft on Smiling versus Depressor Muscle Release.

Authors:  Chevonne Brady; Daniele Berwick; Rajan Uppal
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-04-15

6.  How to predict the outcome of septorhinoplasty? A normative study of ROE and FROI-17 scores.

Authors:  Michaela Plath; Matthias Sand; Carlo Cavaliere; Peter K Plinkert; Ingo Baumann; Karim Zaoui
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 7.  Male esthetic genital surgery: recommendations and gaps to be filled.

Authors:  Carlo Bettocchi; Andrea Alberto Checchia; Ugo Giovanni Falagario; Anna Ricapito; Gian Maria Busetto; Luigi Cormio; Giuseppe Carrieri
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  Assessing patient cosmetic satisfaction after glaucoma drainage device surgery for different patch grafts.

Authors:  Doaa S Milibari; Dalal Fatani; Abeer Ahmad; Ohoud Owaidhah; Saleh A AlObeidan; Faisal A Almobarak; Rizwan Malik
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.209

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.