Literature DB >> 28921876

Validation of artificial neural networks as a methodology for donor-recipient matching for liver transplantation.

María Dolores Ayllón1, Rubén Ciria1, Manuel Cruz-Ramírez2, María Pérez-Ortiz3, Irene Gómez1, Roberto Valente4, John O'Grady4, Manuel de la Mata5, César Hervás-Martínez2, Nigel D Heaton4, Javier Briceño1.   

Abstract

In 2014, we reported a model for donor-recipient (D-R) matching in liver transplantation (LT) based on artificial neural networks (ANNs) from a Spanish multicenter study (Model for Allocation of Donor and Recipient in España [MADR-E]). The aim is to test the ANN-based methodology in a different European health care system in order to validate it. An ANN model was designed using a cohort of patients from King's College Hospital (KCH; n = 822). The ANN was trained and tested using KCH pairs for both 3- and 12-month survival models. End points were probability of graft survival (correct classification rate [CCR]) and nonsurvival (minimum sensitivity [MS]). The final model is a rule-based system for facilitating the decision about the most appropriate D-R matching. Models designed for KCH had excellent prediction capabilities for both 3 months (CCR-area under the curve [AUC] = 0.94; MS-AUC = 0.94) and 12 months (CCR-AUC = 0.78; MS-AUC = 0.82), almost 15% higher than the best obtained by other known scores such as Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and balance of risk. Moreover, these results improve the previously reported ones in the multicentric MADR-E database. In conclusion, the use of ANN for D-R matching in LT in other health care systems achieved excellent prediction capabilities supporting the validation of these tools. It should be considered as the most advanced, objective, and useful tool to date for the management of waiting lists. Liver Transplantation 24 192-203 2018 AASLD.
© 2017 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28921876     DOI: 10.1002/lt.24870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  5 in total

Review 1.  A Comprehensive Review of Outcome Predictors in Low MELD Patients.

Authors:  Nikhilesh R Mazumder; Kofi Atiemo; Matthew Kappus; Giuseppe Cullaro; Matthew E Harinstein; Daniela Ladner; Elizabeth Verna; Jennifer Lai; Josh Levitsky
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.385

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence in hepatology, liver surgery and transplantation: Emerging applications and frontiers of research.

Authors:  Fadl H Veerankutty; Govind Jayan; Manish Kumar Yadav; Krishnan Sarojam Manoj; Abhishek Yadav; Sindhu Radha Sadasivan Nair; T U Shabeerali; Varghese Yeldho; Madhu Sasidharan; Shiraz Ahmad Rather
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2021-12-27

3.  Models to predict the short-term survival of acute-on-chronic liver failure patients following liver transplantation.

Authors:  Min Yang; Bo Peng; Quan Zhuang; Junhui Li; Hong Liu; Ke Cheng; Yingzi Ming
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 4.  The promise of machine learning applications in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Neta Gotlieb; Amirhossein Azhie; Divya Sharma; Ashley Spann; Nan-Ji Suo; Jason Tran; Ani Orchanian-Cheff; Bo Wang; Anna Goldenberg; Michael Chassé; Heloise Cardinal; Joseph Paul Cohen; Andrea Lodi; Melanie Dieude; Mamatha Bhat
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-07-11

5.  Lung Transplantation Advanced Prediction Tool: Determining Recipient's Outcome for a Certain Donor.

Authors:  Farhan Zafar; Md Monir Hossain; Yin Zhang; Alia Dani; Marc Schecter; Don Hayes; Maurizio Macaluso; Christopher Towe; David L S Morales
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 5.385

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.