Literature DB >> 28921607

In labor or in limbo? The experiences of women undergoing induction of labor in hospital: Findings of a qualitative study.

Annabel Jay1, Hilary Thomas2, Fiona Brooks3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Induction of labor currently accounts for around 25% of all births in high-resource countries, yet despite much research into medical aspects, little is known about how women experience this process. This study aimed to explore in depth the induction experience of primiparous women.
METHODS: A qualitative study was undertaken, using a sample of 21 first-time mothers from a maternity unit in the south of England. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in women's homes between 3 and 6 weeks postnatally. Data were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically.
RESULTS: Women awaiting induction on the prenatal ward appeared to occupy a liminal state between pregnancy and labor. Differences were noted between women's and midwives' notions of what constituted "being in labor" and the ward lacked the flexibility to provide individualized care for women in early labor. Unexpected delays in the induction process were common and were a source of anxiety, as was separation from partners at night. Women were not always clear about their plan of care, which added to their anxiety.
CONCLUSIONS: Conceptualizing induction as a liminal state may enhance understanding of women's feelings and promote a more woman-centered approach to care. Thorough preparation for induction, including an explanation of possible delays is fundamental to enabling women to form realistic expectations. Care providers need to consider whether women undergoing induction are receiving adequate support, analgesia, and comfort aids conducive to the promotion of physiological labor and the reduction of anxiety.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  induction; labor; liminality; woman's experiences

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28921607     DOI: 10.1111/birt.12310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  3 in total

1.  Maternal perceptions of the experience of attempted labor induction and medically elective inductions: analysis of survey results from listening to mothers in California.

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Candice Belanoff; Ronald Iverson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Accurate prediction of birth implementing a statistical model through the determination of steroid hormones in saliva.

Authors:  Silvia Alonso; Sara Cáceres; Daniel Vélez; Luis Sanz; Gema Silvan; Maria Jose Illera; Juan Carlos Illera
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Methods of induction of labor and women's experience: a population-based cohort study with mediation analyses.

Authors:  Pauline Blanc-Petitjean; Corinne Dupont; Bruno Carbonne; Marina Salomé; François Goffinet; Camille Le Ray
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.