Literature DB >> 28921088

Difficult laryngoscopy and cephalometric roentgenograms in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients undergoing uvulopalatopharyngoplasty.

Seiji Kato1, Mariko Hoshino1, Fumio Goto1.   

Abstract

We retrospectively studied the incidence of difficult laryngoscopy in 53 subjects with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) undergoing uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) and 72 subjects with chronic otitis media undergoing tympanoplasty (control group). The incidence of difficult laryngoscopy in the UPPP group was significantly higher than in the control group (18.9%vs 4.2%,P<0.001). To analyze the anatomical findings of difficult laryngoscopy in UPPP patients, cephalometric roentgenograms were compared between patients in whom direct laryngoscopy was difficult (difficult patients,n=10) and patients in whom direct laryngoscopy was not difficult (nondifficult patients,n=43). Cephalometric atlanto-occipital distance (cAOD) was less than 4mm in 80% of the difficult patients, and there were significant differences between the difficult patients and the nondifficult patients (2.8±3.3 mmvs 6.7±3.0 mm, mean ±SD,P<0.001). There were significant differences in cephalometric effective mandibular length/cephalometric posterior depth of mandible ratio (cEML/cPDM) between the difficult patients and the nondifficult patients (4.0±0.6vs 4.5 ±0.8,P<0.01); however, the calculation of cEML/cPDM was more difficult than cAOD. We concluded that OSAS patients undergoing UPPP are at high risk for difficult laryngoscopy, and that cAOD calculated from cephalometric roentgenograms is an easy and sensitive predictive indicator for the estimation of difficult laryngoscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cephalometric roentgenogram; Difficult laryngoscopy; Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome; Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty

Year:  1996        PMID: 28921088     DOI: 10.1007/BF02483392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of two methods for predicting difficult intubation.

Authors:  J D Oates; A D Macleod; P D Oates; F J Pearsall; J C Howie; G D Murray
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Relative risk analysis of factors associated with difficult intubation in obstetric anesthesia.

Authors:  D A Rocke; W B Murray; C C Rout; E Gouws
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Obstructive sleep apneic patients have craniomandibular abnormalities.

Authors:  A Jamieson; C Guilleminault; M Partinen; M A Quera-Salva
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics.

Authors:  R S Cormack; J Lehane
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study.

Authors:  S R Mallampati; S P Gatt; L D Gugino; S P Desai; B Waraksa; D Freiberger; P L Liu
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1985-07

6.  Difficult laryngoscopy--the "anterior" larynx and the atlanto-occipital gap.

Authors:  H C Nichol; D Zuck
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Obstructive sleep apnea and cephalometric roentgenograms. The role of anatomic upper airway abnormalities in the definition of abnormal breathing during sleep.

Authors:  M Partinen; C Guilleminault; M A Quera-Salva; A Jamieson
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Mandibulohyoid distance in difficult laryngoscopy.

Authors:  H C Chou; T L Wu
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Sleep apnea and sleep disruption in obese patients.

Authors:  A N Vgontzas; T L Tan; E O Bixler; L F Martin; D Shubert; A Kales
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1994-08-08

10.  Upper airway measurements predict response to uvulopalatopharyngoplasty in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  C F Ryan; R I Dickson; A A Lowe; A Blokmanis; J A Fleetham
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.