Literature DB >> 28920554

A pulmonary embolism response team's initial 20 month experience treating 87 patients with submassive and massive pulmonary embolism.

Akhilesh K Sista1, Oren A Friedman2, Eda Dou3, Brendan Denvir3, Gulce Askin4, Jamie Stern3, Jaclyn Estes3, Arash Salemi5, Ronald S Winokur3, James M Horowitz6.   

Abstract

Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams (PERTs) have emerged to provide rapid multidisciplinary assessment and treatment of PE patients. However, descriptive institutional experience and preliminary outcomes data from such teams are sparse. PERT activations were identified through a retrospective review. Only confirmed submassive or massive PEs were included in the data analysis. In addition to baseline variables, the therapeutic intervention, length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, and bleeding rate/severity were recorded. A total of 124 PERT activations occurred over 20 months: 43 in the first 10 months and 81 in the next 10. A total of 87 submassive (90.8%) and massive (9.2%) PE patients were included. The median age was 65 (51-75 IQR) years. Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) was administered to 25 patients, systemic thrombolysis (ST) to six, and anticoagulation alone (AC) to 54. The median ICU stay and overall LOS were 6 (3-10 IQR) and 7 (4-14 IQR) days, respectively, with no association with any variables except a brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) >100 pg/mL ( p=0.008 ICU LOS; p=0.047 overall LOS). Twelve patients (13.7%) died in the hospital, nine of whom had metastatic or brain cancer, with a median overall LOS of 13 (11-17 IQR) days. There were five major bleeds: one in the CDT group, one in the ST group, and three in the AC group. Overall, (1) PERT activations increased after the first 10 months; (2) BNP >100 pg/mL was associated with a longer LOS; (3) rates of mortality and bleeding did not correlate with treatment; and (4) the majority of in-hospital deaths occurred in patients with advanced cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PE response team (PERT); catheter-directed thrombolysis; hospital length of stay; massive PE; pulmonary embolism (PE); submassive PE

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28920554     DOI: 10.1177/1358863X17730430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vasc Med        ISSN: 1358-863X            Impact factor:   3.239


  9 in total

1.  Hemodynamic decompensation in normotensive patients admitted to the ICU with pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Het Patel; Jenny A Shih; Ryan Gardner; Parth V Patel; Catherine Ross; Margaret M Hayes; Ari Moskowitz; Michael W Donnino
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 3.425

Review 2.  Acute pulmonary embolism: endovascular therapy.

Authors:  Stephen P Reis; Ken Zhao; Noor Ahmad; Reginald S Widemon; Christopher W Root; Seth M Toomay; James M Horowitz; Akhilesh K Sista
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-06

Review 3.  Patient Assessment: Clinical Presentation, Imaging Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and the Role of Pulmonary Embolism Response Team.

Authors:  Tamir Friedman; Ronald S Winokur; Keith B Quencer; David C Madoff
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  The impact of a multi-specialty team for high risk pulmonary embolism on resident and fellow education.

Authors:  Ayman Elbadawi; Colin Wright; Dhwani Patel; Yu Lin Chen; Justin Mazzillo; Pamela Cameron; Geoffrey D Barnes; Scott J Cameron
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 5.  Multidisciplinary approach to the management of pulmonary embolism patients: the pulmonary embolism response team (PERT).

Authors:  Christopher W Root; David M Dudzinski; Bishoy Zakhary; Oren A Friedman; Akhilesh K Sista; James M Horowitz
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2018-04-05

6.  Rationale for catheter-based therapies in acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  M A de Winter; G J Vlachojannis; D Ruigrok; M Nijkeuter; A O Kraaijeveld
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 1.803

7.  Pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) implementation and its clinical value across countries: a scoping review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lukas Hobohm; Ioannis T Farmakis; Karsten Keller; Barbara Scibior; Anna C Mavromanoli; Ingo Sagoschen; Thomas Münzel; Ingo Ahrens; Stavros Konstantinides
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 6.138

8.  Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Consulted by a Multidisciplinary Pulmonary Embolism Response Team: 5-Year Experience.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Pietrasik; Aleksandra Gąsecka; Paweł Kurzyna; Katarzyna Wrona; Szymon Darocha; Marta Banaszkiewicz; Dariusz Zieliński; Dominika Zajkowska; Julia Maria Smyk; Dominika Rymaszewska; Karolina Jasińska; Marcin Wasilewski; Rafał Wolański; Grzegorz Procyk; Piotr Szwed; Michał Florczyk; Krzysztof Wróbel; Marcin Grabowski; Adam Torbicki; Marcin Kurzyna
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.964

9.  Role of Pulmonary Embolism Response Team in patients with intermediate- and high-risk pulmonary embolism: a concise review and preliminary experience from China.

Authors:  Ying Liang; Shao-Ping Nie; Xiao Wang; Ashley Thomas; Elizabeth Thompson; Guan-Qi Zhao; Jing Han; Jing Wang; Mark J D Griffiths
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.327

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.