| Literature DB >> 28919969 |
Yury M Borisov1, Iryna A Kryshchuk2, Helen S Gaiduchenko2, Elena V Cherepanova1, Svetlana V Zadyra3, Elena S Levenkova1, Dmitriy V Lukashov3, Victor N Orlov1.
Abstract
The common shrews, Sorex araneus Linnaeus, 1758, inhabiting the territory of Belarus, are characterized by a significant variation in the frequency of Robertsonian (Rb) translocations. The frequency clines for translocations specific of three chromosome races: the West Dvina (gm, hk, ip, no, qr), Kiev (g/m, hi, k/o, n, p, q, r), and Białowieża (g/r, hn, ik, m/p, o, q) have already been studied in this territory. In this communication we report new data on polymorphic populations with Rb metacentrics specific of the Neroosa race (go, hi, kr, mn, p/q) in south-eastern Belarus, analyse the distribution of karyotypes in southern and central Belarus and draw particular attention to the fixation of the acrocentric variants of chromosomes in this area. The results show that certain Rb metacentrics specific of the Neroosa, West Dvina, Kiev, and Białowieża races (namely, go and pq; ip; ko; hn and ik, respectively) are absent in many polymorphic populations. Thus, the karyotypic differentiation of S. araneus in the studied area is determined by unequal spread of different Rb translocations and by fixation of acrocentric variants of specific chromosomes.Entities:
Keywords: Chromosome races; Robertsonian translocations; Sorex araneus; chromosomal differentiation
Year: 2017 PMID: 28919969 PMCID: PMC5596991 DOI: 10.3897/CompCytogen.11i2.11142
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comp Cytogenet ISSN: 1993-0771 Impact factor: 1.800
Collection sites, chromosome races and karyotypes of common shrews in the territory of Belarus. The numbers indicate localities in Fig. 1. Polymorphism for Rb translocation is indicated by slash (/). Ne, Neroosa; Ki, Kiev; Bi, Białowieża; Wd, West Dvina; Bs, Borisov. S.s., sample size; ?, attribution to any race is unclear.
| No. | Locality | Latitude; Longitude | S.s. | Race | 2NA | Karyotypes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Dobrush |
|
| |||
| 1 | Ne | 23 |
| |||
| 3 | Ne | 24 |
| |||
| 1 | Ne | 24 |
| |||
| 2 | Ne | 26 |
| |||
| 5 | Gomel’ |
|
| |||
| 1 | Ne | 23 |
| |||
| 2 | Ne | 24 |
| |||
| * | 1 | Ne | 24 |
| ||
| 6 | settl. Chernoye (Rechitsa distr.) |
|
| |||
| 4 | Ne | 24 |
| |||
| 9 | Ne | 25 |
| |||
| 9 | ? | 26 |
| |||
| 1 | Ki | 25 |
| |||
| 7 | settl. Krasnoye (Bragin distr.) |
|
| |||
| 5 | Ne |
| ||||
| 3 | Ne | 25 |
| |||
| 4 | Ne | 26 |
| |||
| 2 | Ki | 25 |
| |||
| 18.3 | Bobruisk |
|
| |||
| 2 | Ki | 25 |
| |||
| 2 | Ki | 26 |
| |||
| 3 | Ki | 26 |
| |||
| 1 | Ki | 27 |
| |||
| 31 | settl. Elizovo (Bobruisk distr.) |
|
| |||
| 1 | Bi | 25 |
| |||
| 1 | Bi | 25 |
| |||
| 2 | Bi | 26 |
| |||
| 32 | settl. Lyubonichi (Bobruisk Distr.) |
|
| |||
| 2 | Bi | 25 |
| |||
| 2 | Bi | 25 |
| |||
| 5 | Bi | 26 |
| |||
| 1 | Bi | 27 |
| |||
| 2 | Bi | 27 |
| |||
| 2 | Bi | 28 |
|
Figure 1.The distribution of the chromosome races of the common shrew in Belarus and neighbouring territories: Ne, Neroosa (diamonds); Ki, Kiev (squares); Bi, Białowieża (circles); Wd, West Dvina (light triangles); Bs, Borisov (black triangles); Go, Goldap; Zu, Zuvintas; Ta, Tallin; Ps, Pskov; Lp, Lepel; Mo, Moscow. See Suppl. material 1 for numbers of the collection sites. Dotted line indicates state borders.
Frequencies of race-specific metacentrics in populations of eight chromosome races of . Numbers of sites are the same as in Table 1 and in Fig. 1; the frequency of Rb translocations is an average of studied specimens from all samples. S.s., sample size; two-three digits in column “S.s”. are arranged in the same order as references in column “References”.
| Nos, Sites | References | S.s. | Metacentric frequencies | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 1: Spas-Demensk |
| 6 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 2: Novozybkov |
| 3 | 0.33 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.66 | 0.50 |
| 3. Berezna |
| 2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 4–6: Dobrush, Gomel, Chernoye | new data | 34 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.17 | 0.39 | 0.0 |
| 7: Krasnoye | new data | 14 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.0 |
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
| 9–11: Yeslk, Leshnya, Mozyr’ |
| 2, 29 | 0.08 | 0.65 | 0.16 | ||
| 12, 13: Ozarichi, Rechitsa |
| 3, 16 | 0.0 | 0.72 | 0.53 | ||
| 14, 15: Sosnovyi Bor, Svetlogorsk |
| 10 | 0.0 | 0.65 | 0.15 | ||
| 16, 17: Zhlobin Parichi |
| 25 | 0.0 | 0.50 | 0.19 | ||
| 18.1–18.3: Bobruisk) |
| 2, 1, 8 | 0.0 | 0.67 | 0.33 | ||
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 19: Bialystok |
| 56 | 0.91 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.71 | |
| 20: Grodno |
| 2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
| 21: Lesnoe Ozero |
| 5 | 0.20 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.30 | |
| 22: Białowieża |
| 87 | 0.99 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.95 | |
| 24: Ganzevichi |
| 2 | 0.50 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.50 | |
| 25: Chervonoye |
| 15 | 0.03 | 0.67 | 0.50 | 0.05 | |
| 26, 27: Turov, Khvoyensk |
| 23, 21 | 0.01 | 0.44 | 0.58 | 0.00 | |
| 29: Oktiabr’skiy |
| 22, 19 | 0.01 | 0.33 | 0.37 | 0.01 | |
| 30–32: Tatarka, Elizovo, Lyubonichi |
| 14, 18 | 0.0 | 0.71 | 0.56 | 0.0 | |
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 33: Kardymovo | Orlov Borisov 2009 | 2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 34: Dubrovno | Orlov, Borisov 2009 | 3 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 1.0 | 0.75 |
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 35: Smolyany | Orlov, Borisov 2009 | 2 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 36–39: Malyi Vyazok – Novaya Metcha | Orlov, Borisov 2009, | 5, 33 | 0.84 | 0.99 | 0.0 | 0.38 | 0.09 |
|
| |||||||
| 40, 41: Leskovichi Mikhevichi |
| 7 | 0.64 | 0.86 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 42, 43: Berezino, Yedlino | Orlov, Borisov 2009, | 2, 27 | 0.02 | 0.59 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Figure 2.G-banded karyotype of male shrew of the Kiev race (Svetlogorsk vic., Belarus), g, h/i, j/l, k/o, m, n, o, p, q, r (2NA=26).