| Literature DB >> 28919927 |
Tse-Min Lee1,2, Yu-Fei Tseng1, Chieh-Lun Cheng3, Yi-Chuan Chen1, Chih-Sheng Lin4, Hsiang-Yen Su2,5,6, Te-Jin Chow6, Chun-Yen Chen7, Jo-Shu Chang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fermentative production ofEntities:
Keywords: CO2 utilization efficiency; Chlorella sp.; Lactic acid; Light conversion efficiency; Mutagenesis; N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG); Photosynthesis
Year: 2017 PMID: 28919927 PMCID: PMC5596919 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-017-0905-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Interaction of temperature and CO2 concentration on algal growth in indoor PBR. The growth performance of Chlorella sp. GD wild type and mutant M4 was determined first under different temperatures for 4 days (A) and then under different CO2 concentrations at 25 °C (B) and 40 °C (C) for 4 days. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3) and different letters indicate significant difference between the culture times (P < 0.05)
Fig. 2Growth performance in outdoor PBR. Biomass production (A) and appearance (B) of Chlorella sp. GD wild type and mutant M4 were determined in outdoor PBR aerated with 6% CO2. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3) and different letters indicate significant difference between the culture times (P < 0.05). Air temperature (C), PBR temperature (D), irradiance outside PBR (E), and irradiance inside PBR (F) were recorded over culture period
Fig. 3Interactive effects of temperature, light, and CO2 concentration on algal growth and photosynthesis. The effects of temperature (25 and 40 °C), light intensity (50 and 200 μmol/m2/s), and CO2 concentration (ambient air and 6% CO2) on biomass production (A–D) and photosynthetic O2 evolution rate (E–H) of Chlorella sp. GD wild type and mutant M4 were determined 4 days after culture in indoor PBR. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3) and different letters indicate significant difference between the culture times (P < 0.05)
Fig. 4Time-course changes in photosynthetic activity in indoor PBR. The photosynthetic O2 evolution (A) and PSII activity (F v′/F m′) (B) of wild type and mutant M4 of Chlorella sp. GD were determined in indoor PBR aerated with ambient air or 6% CO2 at 40 °C under 200 μmol/m2/s illumination. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3) and different letters indicate significant difference between the culture times (P < 0.05)
Fig. 5Comparison of photosynthetic light response curve (PI curve) (A–D) and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) utilization curve (E–H). PI curve and DIC utilization curve were determined in wild type and mutant M4 of Chlorella sp. GD after 1 day and 4 days of culture in indoor PBR aerated with ambient air (A, C, E, G) or 6% CO2 (B, D, F, H) at 40 °C under 200 μmol/m2/s illumination. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3)
Comparison of C and N content between Chlorella sp. GD wild type and mutant M4
| Condition | Strain | C% | N% | C/N | Reducing sugar after acid hydrolysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose (%) | Xylose (%) | Total sugar (%) | |||||
| Air | WT | 43.89 ± 0.38b | 6.56 ± 0.11b | 7.8 ± 0.09c | 16.47 ± 0.98c | 8.9 ± 0.51b | 25.37 ± 1.03c |
| M4 | 48.82 ± 0.24a | 7.17 ± 0.04a | 7.94 ± 0.05c | 31.09 ± 1.65a | 8.6 ± 0.84b | 39.69 ± 3.62a | |
| 6% CO2 | WT | 49.24 ± 0.60a | 5.06 ± 0.08c | 11.63 ± 0.09a | 23.17 ± 1.89b | 11.16 ± 0.99a | 34.33 ± 2.85b |
| M4 | 50.33 ± 0.72a | 5.52 ± 0.13c | 10.69 ± 0.17b | 34.05 ± 2.32a | 10.97 ± 0.83a | 45.02 ± 2.76a | |
C and N content (%, w/w, dry weight) and C/N molar ratio of Chlorella sp. GD wild type (WT) and M4 mutant after 4 days of aeration with air or 6% CO2 using laboratory bottle, and their reducing sugar content after acid hydrolysis. The data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3) and the different letters following the SD indicate the significant difference at P < 0.05
Sugar compositions, fermentative lactic acid production, and conversion efficiency
| Strain | Biomass | Start substrate (g) | Reducing sugar after acid hydrolysis | Lactic acid yield (g/g biomass) | Lactic acid production (g lactic acid/L PBR) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose (%) | Xylose (%) | Total sugar (%) | |||||
| WT | 6.16 ± 0.32 | 47.15 | 44.54 ± 1.31 | 4.03 ± 0.52 | 48.57 ± 2.01 | 0.36 | 2.18 |
| M4 | 8.22 ± 0.51* | 39.28 | 54.93 ± 1.03* | 4.90 ± 0.31* | 59.83 ± 1.10* | 0.43 | 3.56 |
The biomass (g dry weight/L PBR), glucose and xylose contents (%, g/g biomass) of Chlorella sp. GD wild type (WT) and M4 mutant after acid hydrolysis using 4% (v/v) H2SO4, as well as the lactic acid production performance of Lactobacillus plantarum 23. The biomass was obtained after 8 days of incubation in 1-L outdoor PBR under 6% CO2 condition. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3)
* Following the SD indicates significant difference at P < 0.05 using student t test
The time-course lactic acid production with Lactobacillus plantarum 23 and the consumption of glucose and xylose from hydrolysate of microalgal feedstock
| Time (h) | Control | WTa | M4b | Lactic acidc (g/L) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose (g/L) | Glucose (g/L) | Xylose (g/L) | Glucose (g/L) | Xylose (g/L) | Control | WT | M4 mutant | |
| 0 | 20.5 ± 0.32 | 21.0 ± 0.33 | 1.9 ± 0.06 | 21.4 ± 0.29 | 2.1 ± 0.10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 4.5 ± 0.17 | 2.65 ± 0.08 | 0.21 ± 0.00 | 2.75 ± 0.13 | 0.2 ± 0.01 | 11.60 ± 0.36 | 13.10 ± 0.54 | 13.45 ± 0.39 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.50 ± 0.28 | 16.10 ± 0.40 | 16.38 ± 0.62 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.40 ± 0.12 | 16.13 ± 0.08 | 16.45 ± 0.13 |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.50 ± 0.12 | 16.13 ± 0.08 | 16.45 ± 0.13 |
| 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.50 ± 0.12 | 16.13 ± 0.08 | 16.45 ± 0.13 |
| Conversion rated (%) | 74.87 | 80.42 | 79.17 | |||||
The WT and M4 mutant feedstock was obtained after 8 days of culture under 6% CO2 condition. Pure glucose (used as control) in the fermentation broth of the control test was 20.5 g/L and accordingly, the content of glucose in the hydrolysate of the wild type (WT) and M4 mutant in the fermentation broth was adjusted to around 21 g/L with a xylose content of around 2 g/L. The conversion rate is estimated as (lactic acid content/theoretical lactic acid content) × 100 after 24 h of fermentation. The data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3)
a47.15 g day wt. of WT feedstock in 1 L fermentative mixture
b39.28 g day wt. of M4 feedstock in 1 L fermentative mixture
cLactic acid in 1 L fermentative mixture
d(Real lactic acid content/theoretical lactic acid content) × 100
Fig. 6Time-course profile of lactic acid yield, lactic acid productivity, and the growth (OD600) of Lactobacillus plantarum 23 during lactic acid fermentation using microalgal biomass as feedstock. The feedstock from WT (A) and M4 mutant (B) strains was obtained from 8-day culture under aeration with 6% CO2. The content of glucose in wild type (WT) and M4 mutant in the fermentative mixture was adjusted to around 21 g/L, while the xylose content was around 2 g/L