Irfan Moinuddin1, Muhammad Sohail Yaqub2, Tim Taber2, John Powelson3, Jonathan Fridell3, Asif Sharfuddin2. 1. Transplant Nephrology, Division of Nephrology, Indiana University, 550 University Blvd, Suite 2180, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. irfanmoinuddin@yahoo.com. 2. Transplant Nephrology, Division of Nephrology, Indiana University, 550 University Blvd, Suite 2180, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. 3. Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Diabetic Kidney Disease is associated with excessive mortality and morbidity. Simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation (SPK) significantly improves quality of life and increases life expectancy of uremic diabetic patients. It is not known whether pancreas and kidney rejections in these transplant patients is concordant or discordant. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: We analyzed clinical data on all SPK transplants performed between 2003 and 2014 at Indiana University to assess the impact of isolated or combined pancreas and kidney rejections on patient and allograft outcomes. The primary outcome of interest was kidney graft rejection within 1 year of pancreatic rejection and kidney survival in SPK patients with and without pancreatic rejection. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 44 ± 9 years; 61.9% were males; 88% were Caucasians. A total of 23.8% of cases had rejection [8.7% pancreatic rejection alone (PA), 4.4% had concordant pancreas and kidney (PK) rejection, and 10.7% had kidney rejection alone(KA)]. PK had a worse effect on kidney graft survival than PA (p = 0.019). Neither pancreas rejection nor kidney rejection had an adverse effect on patient survival. However, both pancreas graft failure and kidney graft failure adversely affected patient survival. Tacrolimus levels were not significantly different in all groups over a 10 year period (p = 0.4584). CONCLUSIONS: Concordant pancreas kidney rejection is synergistically deleterious to kidney graft survival. Graft failure, not graft rejection, is adversely associated with patient survival.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Diabetic Kidney Disease is associated with excessive mortality and morbidity. Simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation (SPK) significantly improves quality of life and increases life expectancy of uremic diabeticpatients. It is not known whether pancreas and kidney rejections in these transplant patients is concordant or discordant. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: We analyzed clinical data on all SPK transplants performed between 2003 and 2014 at Indiana University to assess the impact of isolated or combined pancreas and kidney rejections on patient and allograft outcomes. The primary outcome of interest was kidney graft rejection within 1 year of pancreatic rejection and kidney survival in SPK patients with and without pancreatic rejection. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 44 ± 9 years; 61.9% were males; 88% were Caucasians. A total of 23.8% of cases had rejection [8.7% pancreatic rejection alone (PA), 4.4% had concordant pancreas and kidney (PK) rejection, and 10.7% had kidney rejection alone(KA)]. PK had a worse effect on kidney graft survival than PA (p = 0.019). Neither pancreas rejection nor kidney rejection had an adverse effect on patient survival. However, both pancreas graft failure and kidney graft failure adversely affected patient survival. Tacrolimus levels were not significantly different in all groups over a 10 year period (p = 0.4584). CONCLUSIONS:Concordant pancreas kidney rejection is synergistically deleterious to kidney graft survival. Graft failure, not graft rejection, is adversely associated with patient survival.
Authors: Megan L Troxell; David Bradley Koslin; Douglas Norman; Stephen Rayhill; Anuja Mittalhenkle Journal: Transplantation Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: R Shapiro; M L Jordan; V P Scantlebury; C A Vivas; A Jain; J McCauley; M F Egidi; P Randhawa; P Chakrabarti; R J Corry Journal: Transplantation Date: 2000-02-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Hidenori Takahashi; Tomoaki Kato; Victor Delacruz; Seigo Nishida; Gennaro Selvaggi; Debbie Weppler; Eddie Island; Jang I Moon; David M Levi; Andreas G Tzakis; Phillip Ruiz Journal: Transplantation Date: 2008-06-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: A O Ojo; H U Meier-Kriesche; J A Hanson; A Leichtman; J C Magee; D Cibrik; R A Wolfe; F K Port; L Agodoa; D B Kaufman; B Kaplan Journal: Transplantation Date: 2001-01-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: K Sudhakar Reddy; Darcy Davies; Debra Ormond; Sony Tuteja; Bruce A Lucas; Thomas D Johnston; Thomas Waid; John W McKeown; Dinesh Ranjan Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: S C Rayhill; A M D'Alessandro; J S Odorico; S J Knechtle; J D Pirsch; D M Heisey; A D Kirk; W Van der Werf; H W Sollinger Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Hans W Sollinger; Jon S Odorico; Yolanda T Becker; Anthony M D'Alessandro; John D Pirsch Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: R W Gruessner; R Nakhleh; P Tzardis; R Schechner; J L Platt; A Gruessner; G Tomadze; J S Najarian; D E Sutherland Journal: Transplantation Date: 1994-04-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: David van Dellen; Judith Worthington; Otilia M Mitu-Pretorian; Abbas Ghazanfar; Bence Forgacs; Ravi Pararajasingam; Babatunde Campbell; Neil R Parrott; Titus Augustine; Afshin Tavakoli Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 5.992