Nadine J McCleary1, Joleen Hubbard2, Michelle R Mahoney3, Jeffrey A Meyerhardt4, Daniel Sargent3, Alan Venook5, Axel Grothey2. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: nj_mccleary@dfci.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States. 3. Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States. 4. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA, United States. 5. Department of Medical Oncology, University of San Francisco, CA, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: While the risk of developing colorectal cancer increases with age, there are limited prospective data regarding best treatment in the older adult population. We launched a phase III trial to evaluate difference in treatment outcome for older adults (aged ≥70years) with advanced colorectal cancer. Here we review the challenges faced and reasons for poor accrual to N0949. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We describe the conceptualization, development and limited results of N0949, a randomized phase III study of fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab with or without oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX7 or XELOX) as first line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Fluoropyrimidine was physician choice (e.g., 5-FU/LV or capecitabine). RESULTS:Of the projected 380 patients, only 32 patients were enrolled between the study activation in January 2011 until its closure in September 2012. Reasons for poor accrual included eligibility criteria that were too stringent, discomfort with randomizing older patients to regimens of varying intensity without considering their physical fitness, and discomfort with the use of bevacizumab in the older patient population. Several efforts were mounted to design a rationale and age-appropriate study, consider toxicities and varying study practices, and be responsive to stakeholder feedback. CONCLUSIONS: Challenges were experienced in conducting the first prospective phase III study evaluating progression-free survival of older adults with advanced colorectal cancer receivingpalliative chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab with or without oxaliplatin in the USA. Future efforts to evaluate treatment outcomes in the older adult population should reflect on lessons learned in this large national effort.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: While the risk of developing colorectal cancer increases with age, there are limited prospective data regarding best treatment in the older adult population. We launched a phase III trial to evaluate difference in treatment outcome for older adults (aged ≥70years) with advanced colorectal cancer. Here we review the challenges faced and reasons for poor accrual to N0949. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We describe the conceptualization, development and limited results of N0949, a randomized phase III study of fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab with or without oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX7 or XELOX) as first line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Fluoropyrimidine was physician choice (e.g., 5-FU/LV or capecitabine). RESULTS: Of the projected 380 patients, only 32 patients were enrolled between the study activation in January 2011 until its closure in September 2012. Reasons for poor accrual included eligibility criteria that were too stringent, discomfort with randomizing older patients to regimens of varying intensity without considering their physical fitness, and discomfort with the use of bevacizumab in the older patient population. Several efforts were mounted to design a rationale and age-appropriate study, consider toxicities and varying study practices, and be responsive to stakeholder feedback. CONCLUSIONS: Challenges were experienced in conducting the first prospective phase III study evaluating progression-free survival of older adults with advanced colorectal cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab with or without oxaliplatin in the USA. Future efforts to evaluate treatment outcomes in the older adult population should reflect on lessons learned in this large national effort.
Authors: Arti Hurria; Kayo Togawa; Supriya G Mohile; Cynthia Owusu; Heidi D Klepin; Cary P Gross; Stuart M Lichtman; Ajeet Gajra; Smita Bhatia; Vani Katheria; Shira Klapper; Kurt Hansen; Rupal Ramani; Mark Lachs; F Lennie Wong; William P Tew Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-08-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: T J Price; D Zannino; K Wilson; R J Simes; J Cassidy; G A Van Hazel; B A Robinson; A Broad; V Ganju; S P Ackland; N C Tebbutt Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2011-10-29 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Arti Hurria; Constance T Cirrincione; Hyman B Muss; Alice B Kornblith; William Barry; Andrew S Artz; Linda Schmieder; Rafat Ansari; William P Tew; Douglas Weckstein; Jeffrey Kirshner; Kayo Togawa; Kurt Hansen; Vani Katheria; Richard Stone; Ilene Galinsky; John Postiglione; Harvey Jay Cohen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-02-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Matthew T Seymour; Lindsay C Thompson; Harpreet S Wasan; Gary Middleton; Alison E Brewster; Stephen F Shepherd; M Sinead O'Mahony; Timothy S Maughan; Mahesh Parmar; Ruth E Langley Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: James Cassidy; Leonard B Saltz; Bruce J Giantonio; Fairooz F Kabbinavar; Herbert I Hurwitz; Ulrich-Peter Rohr Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-11 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Mina S Sedrak; Supriya G Mohile; Virginia Sun; Can-Lan Sun; Bihong T Chen; Daneng Li; Andrew R Wong; Kevin George; Simran Padam; Jennifer Liu; Vani Katheria; William Dale Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Mina S Sedrak; Rachel A Freedman; Harvey J Cohen; Hyman B Muss; Aminah Jatoi; Heidi D Klepin; Tanya M Wildes; Jennifer G Le-Rademacher; Gretchen G Kimmick; William P Tew; Kevin George; Simran Padam; Jennifer Liu; Andrew R Wong; Andrea Lynch; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Supriya G Mohile; William Dale Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 508.702