Literature DB >> 28916371

Ramucirumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus docetaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum-based therapy (RANGE): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

Daniel P Petrylak1, Ronald de Wit2, Kim N Chi3, Alexandra Drakaki4, Cora N Sternberg5, Hiroyuki Nishiyama6, Daniel Castellano7, Syed Hussain8, Aude Fléchon9, Aristotelis Bamias10, Evan Y Yu11, Michiel S van der Heijden12, Nobuaki Matsubara13, Boris Alekseev14, Andrea Necchi15, Lajos Géczi16, Yen-Chuan Ou17, Hasan Senol Coskun18, Wen-Pin Su19, Miriam Hegemann20, Ivor J Percent21, Jae-Lyun Lee22, Marcello Tucci23, Andrey Semenov24, Fredrik Laestadius25, Avivit Peer26, Giampaolo Tortora27, Sufia Safina28, Xavier Garcia Del Muro29, Alejo Rodriguez-Vida30, Irfan Cicin31, Hakan Harputluoglu32, Ryan C Widau33, Astra M Liepa33, Richard A Walgren33, Oday Hamid33, Annamaria H Zimmermann33, Katherine M Bell-McGuinn33, Thomas Powles34.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few treatments with a distinct mechanism of action are available for patients with platinum-refractory advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. We assessed the efficacy and safety of treatment with docetaxel plus either ramucirumab-a human IgG1 VEGFR-2 antagonist-or placebo in this patient population.
METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were enrolled from 124 sites in 23 countries. Previous treatment with one immune-checkpoint inhibitor was permitted. Patients were randomised (1:1) using an interactive web response system to receive intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m2 plus either intravenous ramucirumab 10 mg/kg or matching placebo on day 1 of repeating 21-day cycles, until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria were met. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed by intention-to-treat in the first 437 randomised patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02426125.
FINDINGS: Between July, 2015, and April, 2017, 530 patients were randomly allocated either ramucirumab plus docetaxel (n=263) or placebo plus docetaxel (n=267). Progression-free survival was prolonged significantly in patients allocated ramucirumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus docetaxel (median 4·07 months [95% CI 2·96-4·47] vs 2·76 months [2·60-2·96]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·757, 95% CI 0·607-0·943; p=0·0118). A blinded independent central analysis was consistent with these results. An objective response was achieved by 53 (24·5%, 95% CI 18·8-30·3) of 216 patients allocated ramucirumab and 31 (14·0%, 9·4-18·6) of 221 assigned placebo. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events, regardless of causality, in either treatment group (any grade) were fatigue, alopecia, diarrhoea, decreased appetite, and nausea. These events occurred predominantly at grade 1-2 severity. The frequency of grade 3 or worse adverse events was similar for patients allocated ramucirumab and placebo (156 [60%] of 258 vs 163 [62%] of 265 had an adverse event), with no unexpected toxic effects. 63 (24%) of 258 patients allocated ramucirumab and 54 (20%) of 265 assigned placebo had a serious adverse event that was judged by the investigator to be related to treatment. 38 (15%) of 258 patients allocated ramucirumab and 43 (16%) of 265 assigned placebo died on treatment or within 30 days of discontinuation, of which eight (3%) and five (2%) deaths were deemed related to treatment by the investigator. Sepsis was the most common adverse event leading to death on treatment (four [2%] vs none [0%]). One fatal event of neutropenic sepsis was reported in a patient allocated ramucirumab.
INTERPRETATION: To the best of our knowledge, ramucirumab plus docetaxel is the first regimen in a phase 3 study to show superior progression-free survival over chemotherapy in patients with platinum-refractory advanced urothelial carcinoma. These data validate inhibition of VEGFR-2 signalling as a potential new therapeutic treatment option for patients with urothelial carcinoma. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28916371     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32365-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  49 in total

Review 1.  VEGF inhibition in urothelial cancer: the past, present and future.

Authors:  Sanaz Ghafouri; Aaron Burkenroad; Morgan Pantuck; Bara Almomani; Dimitris Stefanoudakis; John Shen; Alexandra Drakaki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Contemporary Molecular Classification of Urinary Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Dimitrios Goutas; Andrianos Tzortzis; Harikleia Gakiopoulou; Dimitrios Vlachodimitropoulos; Ioanna Giannopoulou; Andreas C Lazaris
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 3.  Emerging biomarkers and targeted therapies in urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Prateek Mendiratta; Petros Grivas
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-06

Review 4.  Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Urothelial Carcinomas.

Authors:  Michal Sarfaty; Jonathan E Rosenberg
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Bladder cancer: Combination therapy effective in advanced disease.

Authors:  Clemens Thoma
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Urothelial cancer in 2017: Changes in expectations for metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Joaquim Bellmunt; Rosa Nadal
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Genomic distinctions between metastatic lower and upper tract urothelial carcinoma revealed through rapid autopsy.

Authors:  Brian R Winters; Navonil De Sarkar; Sonali Arora; Hamid Bolouri; Sujata Jana; Funda Vakar-Lopez; Heather H Cheng; Michael T Schweizer; Evan Y Yu; Petros Grivas; John K Lee; Lori Kollath; Sarah K Holt; Lisa McFerrin; Gavin Ha; Peter S Nelson; Robert B Montgomery; Jonathan L Wright; Hung-Ming Lam; Andrew C Hsieh
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2019-05-30

8.  Second-line systemic therapies for metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a population-based cohort analysis.

Authors:  E S Tsang; C Forbes; K N Chi; B J Eigl; S Parimi
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 9.  Recent advances in medical therapy for metastatic urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Takeshi Yuasa; Shinji Urakami; Junji Yonese
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 10.  The Cancer Immunogram as a Framework for Personalized Immunotherapy in Urothelial Cancer.

Authors:  Nick van Dijk; Samuel A Funt; Christian U Blank; Thomas Powles; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Michiel S van der Heijden
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.