Literature DB >> 28916160

[Sociodemographic and health-related determinants of health care utilisation and access to primary and specialist care: Results of a nationwide population survey in Germany (2006-2016)].

Florian Tille1, Bernhard Gibis2, Klaus Balke2, Adelheid Kuhlmey3, Susanne Schnitzer3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper is to identify systematic differences due to sociodemographic and health-related determinants in outpatient healthcare utilisation and access in Germany for the period from 2006 to 2016. The study focuses on frequent users and those reporting particularly long wait times for their physician appointments, and it contributes to assessing the level of health equity in Germany.
METHODS: The investigation draws on nine population surveys conducted by the German National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (NASHIP), which interviewed 42,925 respondents aged 18 and above. "Frequent users" were operationalised as those respondents who reported more than ten consultations with outpatient general practitioners (GPs) and specialists (SPs) in the preceding twelve months. Respondents who experienced wait times of more than one month for their last doctor appointment were categorised as "very long wait times". Sociodemographic determinants included age, gender, educational and occupational status, population and region of place of residence, as well as type of health insurance of the respondents. Health-related factors were self-assessed health status and reason for last medical consultation. Statistical analyses were conducted using bivariate and multivariate techniques (logistic regression).
RESULTS: Utilisation: Frequent users of GPs and SPs are predominantly respondents in poor health, retirees and younger persons (18 to 34 years of age). Furthermore, people with a lower educational background consult their GPs significantly more often than people with higher levels of education. Also, patients with statutory health insurance coverage visit GPs more frequently than those having private health insurance, whereas the opposite holds true for SP consultations. Access: Very long wait times for GP and SP appointments were most often experienced by respondents who consult GPs and SPs for preventive medical check-ups or health screenings, have statutory health insurance, live in eastern Germany and who are above 60 years of age. In addition, people with higher levels of education are significantly more likely to experience wait times for SP appointments of more than one month than people with a lower educational background. The proportion of frequent users as well as of those reporting very long wait times for SP appointments has increased in Germany over the period examined.
CONCLUSION: This study reveals that a high frequency of GP and SP consultations is primarily associated with self-assessed poor health, indicating that prioritisation is based on clinical need. In order to ensure the same needs-based prioritisation in the access to outpatient healthcare, regulatory measures are required to decrease wait times of more than one month for SP appointments, with a special focus on people with statutory health insurance coverage, residents of eastern Germany and the elderly.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arztbesuch; Bevölkerungsbefragung; Inanspruchnahme; Wartezeit; Zugang; appointment wait times; gesundheitsbezogene Merkmale; health care access; health care utilization; health-related determinants; medical consultation; population survey; sociodemographic determinants; soziodemografische Merkmale

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28916160     DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes        ISSN: 1865-9217


  9 in total

1.  Determinants and disparities in access to paediatricians in Poland.

Authors:  Tadeusz Zienkiewicz; Maria Klatka; Ewa Zienkiewicz; Janusz Klatka
Journal:  BMC Prim Care       Date:  2022-04-27

2.  Frequent attendance in primary care in the oldest old: evidence from the AgeCoDe-AgeQualiDe study.

Authors:  Elżbieta Buczak-Stec; André Hajek; Martin Scherer; Hans-Helmut König; Hendrik van den Bussche; Marion Eisele; Birgitt Wiese; Silke Mamone; Siegfried Weyerer; Jochen Werle; Angela Fuchs; Michael Pentzek; Susanne Röhr; Franziska Welzel; Dagmar Weeg; Edelgard Mösch; Kathrin Heser; Michael Wagner; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Wolfgang Maier
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Patients' understanding of health information in Germany.

Authors:  Florian Tille; Heide Weishaar; Bernhard Gibis; Susanne Schnitzer
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 4.  Socioeconomic inequalities in primary-care and specialist physician visits: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sara Lena Lueckmann; Jens Hoebel; Julia Roick; Jenny Markert; Jacob Spallek; Olaf von dem Knesebeck; Matthias Richter
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2021-02-10

5.  Intended healthcare utilisation in cases of severe COVID-19 and inflammatory gastrointestinal disease: results of a population survey with vignettes.

Authors:  Jens Klein; Annette Strauß; Sarah Koens; Ingmar Schäfer; Olaf von dem Knesebeck
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Gynaecology and general practitioner services utilisation by women in the age group 50 years and older.

Authors:  Laura Krause; Lorena Dini; Franziska Prütz
Journal:  J Health Monit       Date:  2020-06-30

7.  Investigating associated factors of primary and specialist health care utilization among people with selected nationalities: results of a multilingual survey in two German federal states.

Authors:  Anne-Kathrin M Loer; Carmen Koschollek; Claudia Hövener
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 2.908

8.  Equity in health care: An urban and rural, and gender perspective; the Suriname Health Study.

Authors:  Ccf Smits; J R Toelsie; Mgm Eersel; Isk Krishnadath
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2018-02-27

9.  [Readmission rates of back pain patients after primarily conservative inpatient treatment at a university hospital].

Authors:  Florian Ihde; Robert Lenz; Wolfram Mittelmeier; Katrin Osmanski-Zenk
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.087

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.