Mohammad Shenagari1, Ali Monfared2, Hadise Eghtedari3, Aydin Pourkazemi4, Tolou Hasandokht5, Masoud Khosravi4, Babak Asharfkhani3. 1. Organ Transplant Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran; Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. Electronic address: shenagari@gums.ac.ir. 2. Organ Transplant Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran; Urology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. Electronic address: drmonfared2009@gmail.com. 3. Faculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. 4. Organ Transplant Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. 5. Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Considering the increasing problem of BK virus infection during post renal transplant surveillance, it is necessary to distinguish the main risk factors leading to reactivation of latent BK virus. Up to now, some probable risk factors have been investigated in some studies, but the results have been confusing and contradictory. OBJECTIVES: The goal of the present study was to determine the frequency and potential risk factors that may play a role in BK polyomavirus reactivation and nephropathy. STUDY DESIGN: In this cross-sectional study, 110 patients, who underwent consecutive transplantation between 2010 and 2013, were enrolled without preliminary screening. Urine and blood samples were taken, and quantitative Real-time PCR assay was used to detect and measure the viral load. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients who had BK viremia and/or viruria were documented. RESULTS: Among 110 cases of renal transplant recipients, BK viruria and viremia were found in 54 (49%) and 22 people (20%) respectively. The pre-transplant durations of dialysis among patients with BK viruia were found longer in comparison to BK negative patients. Treatment with Tacrolimus (p=0.03) was found to be a risk factor for development of BK viruria. In patients with viruria and viremia the median creatinine levels were 1.45mg/dl and 1.35mg/dl respectively, which were higher than those in the patients with negative results for BK viruria (p=0.002) and viremia (p=0.02). Also, treatment with Cyclosporine could significantly increase the incidence of BK virus shedding in both urine and blood among patients who received it (p=0.01). Significant relation between reactivation of BK virus and other factors such as age, sex, acute rejection and diabetes was not found. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, the main potential risk factors for shedding of BK virus into urine in renal transplant recipients were prolonged pre-transplant dialysis and Tacrolimus regimen. Cyclosporine regimens could be considered as risk factor for both BK viruria and viremia. A significant correlation between BK virus replication and elevated creatinine level was seen among our patients.
BACKGROUND: Considering the increasing problem of BK virus infection during post renal transplant surveillance, it is necessary to distinguish the main risk factors leading to reactivation of latent BK virus. Up to now, some probable risk factors have been investigated in some studies, but the results have been confusing and contradictory. OBJECTIVES: The goal of the present study was to determine the frequency and potential risk factors that may play a role in BK polyomavirus reactivation and nephropathy. STUDY DESIGN: In this cross-sectional study, 110 patients, who underwent consecutive transplantation between 2010 and 2013, were enrolled without preliminary screening. Urine and blood samples were taken, and quantitative Real-time PCR assay was used to detect and measure the viral load. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients who had BK viremia and/or viruria were documented. RESULTS: Among 110 cases of renal transplant recipients, BK viruria and viremia were found in 54 (49%) and 22 people (20%) respectively. The pre-transplant durations of dialysis among patients with BK viruia were found longer in comparison to BK negative patients. Treatment with Tacrolimus (p=0.03) was found to be a risk factor for development of BK viruria. In patients with viruria and viremia the median creatinine levels were 1.45mg/dl and 1.35mg/dl respectively, which were higher than those in the patients with negative results for BK viruria (p=0.002) and viremia (p=0.02). Also, treatment with Cyclosporine could significantly increase the incidence of BK virus shedding in both urine and blood among patients who received it (p=0.01). Significant relation between reactivation of BK virus and other factors such as age, sex, acute rejection and diabetes was not found. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, the main potential risk factors for shedding of BK virus into urine in renal transplant recipients were prolonged pre-transplant dialysis and Tacrolimus regimen. Cyclosporine regimens could be considered as risk factor for both BK viruria and viremia. A significant correlation between BK virus replication and elevated creatinine level was seen among our patients.