Literature DB >> 28915315

On the causes of trends in the seasonal amplitude of atmospheric CO2.

Shilong Piao1,2,3, Zhuo Liu1, Yilong Wang4, Philippe Ciais4, Yitong Yao1, Shushi Peng1, Frédéric Chevallier4, Pierre Friedlingstein5, Ivan A Janssens6, Josep Peñuelas7,8, Stephen Sitch9, Tao Wang2,3.   

Abstract

No consensus has yet been reached on the major factors driving the observed increase in the seasonal amplitude of atmospheric CO2 in the northern latitudes. In this study, we used atmospheric CO2 records from 26 northern hemisphere stations with a temporal coverage longer than 15 years, and an atmospheric transport model prescribed with net biome productivity (NBP) from an ensemble of nine terrestrial ecosystem models, to attribute change in the seasonal amplitude of atmospheric CO2 . We found significant (p < .05) increases in seasonal peak-to-trough CO2 amplitude (AMPP-T ) at nine stations, and in trough-to-peak amplitude (AMPT-P ) at eight stations over the last three decades. Most of the stations that recorded increasing amplitudes are in Arctic and boreal regions (>50°N), consistent with previous observations that the amplitude increased faster at Barrow (Arctic) than at Mauna Loa (subtropics). The multi-model ensemble mean (MMEM) shows that the response of ecosystem carbon cycling to rising CO2 concentration (eCO2 ) and climate change are dominant drivers of the increase in AMPP-T and AMPT-P in the high latitudes. At the Barrow station, the observed increase of AMPP-T and AMPT-P over the last 33 years is explained by eCO2 (39% and 42%) almost equally than by climate change (32% and 35%). The increased carbon losses during the months with a net carbon release in response to eCO2 are associated with higher ecosystem respiration due to the increase in carbon storage caused by eCO2 during carbon uptake period. Air-sea CO2 fluxes (10% for AMPP-T and 11% for AMPT-P ) and the impacts of land-use change (marginally significant 3% for AMPP-T and 4% for AMPT-P ) also contributed to the CO2 measured at Barrow, highlighting the role of these factors in regulating seasonal changes in the global carbon cycle.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CO2 fertilization effect; amplitude of atmospheric CO2; attribution; climate change; detection; land-use change

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28915315     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  4 in total

1.  Impact of Changing Winds on the Mauna Loa CO2 Seasonal Cycle in Relation to the Pacific Decadal Oscillation.

Authors:  Yuming Jin; Ralph F Keeling; Christian Rödenbeck; Prabir K Patra; Stephen C Piper; Armin Schwartzman
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 5.217

2.  Interannual and Seasonal Drivers of Carbon Cycle Variability Represented by the Community Earth System Model (CESM2).

Authors:  William R Wieder; Zachary Butterfield; Keith Lindsay; Danica L Lombardozzi; Gretchen Keppel-Aleks
Journal:  Global Biogeochem Cycles       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 6.500

Review 3.  The influence of rising tropospheric carbon dioxide and ozone on plant productivity.

Authors:  E A Ainsworth; P Lemonnier; J M Wedow
Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.081

4.  Higher than expected CO2 fertilization inferred from leaf to global observations.

Authors:  Vanessa Haverd; Benjamin Smith; Josep G Canadell; Matthias Cuntz; Sara Mikaloff-Fletcher; Graham Farquhar; William Woodgate; Peter R Briggs; Cathy M Trudinger
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 10.863

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.