Literature DB >> 28913551

Bladder cancer in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial.

Sven Kohler1, Jisoo Lee2, Jyothis T George2, Silvio E Inzucchi3, Bernard Zinman4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; Cancer; Empagliflozin; SGLT2 inhibitors; Type 2 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28913551      PMCID: PMC6448940          DOI: 10.1007/s00125-017-4430-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetologia        ISSN: 0012-186X            Impact factor:   10.122


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: We read with interest the recently published article in Diabetologia by Tang et al on the risk of cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors [1]. We agree with their conclusion that treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors is not associated with a significantly increased risk of cancer. In their analysis of specific cancer types, the authors suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors may be associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer. With respect to empagliflozin, the authors report that the cardiovascular outcomes trial, EMPA-REG OUTCOME, conducted in individuals with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease, contributed over 50% of individuals and events to their analysis of bladder cancer. We would like to draw attention to data from this trial that were not considered by the authors, which (except for the data on the events reported up to 7 days after the last intake of study drug) were included in documents submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration [2]. In the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial, cases of bladder cancer were identified from adverse events coded using the following preferred terms in the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA): ‘bladder cancer’; ‘bladder cancer recurrent’; ‘bladder cancer transitional cell carcinoma’; and ‘transitional cell carcinoma’. Transitional cell carcinoma accounts for over 90% of all bladder cancers [3]. Documentation relating to events coded as transitional cell carcinoma was medically reviewed and cases confirmed. In an on-treatment analysis based on events reported from the first intake of study drug up to 7 days after the last intake, four transitional cell carcinoma cases were located in the bladder (three in the placebo group, one in the empagliflozin 10 mg group) and one was located in the ureter (in the empagliflozin 25 mg group). In an intent-to-treat analysis (based on events reported from the first intake of study drug up to trial termination in patients treated with ≥ 1 dose of study drug), bladder cancer was reported in 5/2333 patients (0.2%) in the placebo group, 3/2345 patients (0.1%) in the empagliflozin 10 mg group and 9/2342 patients (0.4%) in the empagliflozin 25 mg group (Table 1).
Table 1

Bladder cancer events in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial

EventsPlaceboEmpagliflozin 10 mgEmpagliflozin 25 mgEmpagliflozin pooled
Events from first intake of study drug up to 7 days after the last intake of study drug n = 2333 n = 2345 n = 2342 n = 4687
 Bladder cancer3 (0.1)3 (0.1)8 (0.3)11 (0.2)
  Bladder cancer01 (< 0.1)5 (0.2)6 (0.1)
  Bladder cancer recurrent001 (< 0.1)1 (< 0.1)
  Bladder cancer transitional cell carcinoma01 (< 0.1)1 (< 0.1)2 (< 0.1)
  Transitional cell carcinoma3 (0.1)1 (< 0.1)1 (< 0.1)2 (< 0.1)
Events from first intake of study drug up to trial termination n = 2333 n = 2345 n = 2342 n = 4687
 Bladder cancer5 (0.2)3 (0.1)9 (0.4)12 (0.3)
  Bladder cancer1 (< 0.1)1 (< 0.1)6 (0.3)7 (0.1)
  Bladder cancer recurrent001 (< 0.1)1 (< 0.1)
  Bladder cancer transitional cell carcinoma01 (< 0.1)1 (< 0.1)2 (< 0.1)
  Transitional cell carcinoma4 (0.1)1 (< 0.1)1 (< 0.1)2 (< 0.1)
Events with onset after 6 months’ cumulative exposure up to trial termination n = 2187 n = 2216 n = 2190 n = 4406
 Bladder cancer4 (0.2)3 (0.1)7 (0.3)10 (0.2)
  Bladder cancer1 (< 0.1)1 (< 0.1)5 (0.2)6 (0.1)
  Bladder cancer recurrent0000
  Bladder cancer transitional cell carcinoma01 (< 0.1)1 (< 0.1)2 (< 0.1)
  Transitional cell carcinoma3 (0.1)1 (< 0.1)1 (< 0.1)2 (< 0.1)

Data are n (%) with events in patients treated with ≥1 dose of study drug

Bladder cancer events were identified based on Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) preferred terms (plus medical review of cases for events coded as transitional cell carcinoma)

Bladder cancer events in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial Data are n (%) with events in patients treated with ≥1 dose of study drug Bladder cancer events were identified based on Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) preferred terms (plus medical review of cases for events coded as transitional cell carcinoma) To elucidate the potential association between a substance and carcinogenesis, length of exposure needs to be considered. We undertook an additional analysis of patients with at least 6 months’ drug exposure. Bladder cancer with an onset after 6 months’ cumulative exposure to study drug was reported in 4/2187 patients (0.2%) in the placebo group, 3/2216 patients (0.1%) in the empagliflozin 10 mg group, and 7/2190 patients (0.3%) in the empagliflozin 25 mg group (Table 1). With the number of events being so small, a few additional cases can make a difference to the conclusions drawn. Based on the totality of the data, no imbalance in bladder cancer cases between empagliflozin and placebo were observed in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial.
  2 in total

Review 1.  SGLT2 inhibitors and risk of cancer in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Huilin Tang; Qi Dai; Weilong Shi; Suodi Zhai; Yiqing Song; Jiali Han
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 2.  Current perspectives in bladder cancer management.

Authors:  T R L Griffiths
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.503

  2 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Use of SGLT2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes: weighing the risks and benefits.

Authors:  Beatrice C Lupsa; Silvio E Inzucchi
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Cancer risk in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial. Reply to Shaikh AMY [letter] and Kohler S, Lee J, George JT et al [letter].

Authors:  Huilin Tang; Jiali Han; Yiqing Song
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2017-09-17       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 3.  The current role of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes mellitus management.

Authors:  Bo Xu; Shaoqian Li; Bo Kang; Jiecan Zhou
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 8.949

4.  Review of Associations Between Type 2 Diabetes and Cancer.

Authors:  Pranay R Bonagiri; Jay H Shubrook
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2020-07

Review 5.  The Pleiotropic Effects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors: Beyond the Glycemic Benefit.

Authors:  Dhiren K Patel; Jodi Strong
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.945

Review 6.  Adverse events associated with sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors: an overview of quantitative systematic reviews.

Authors:  Ryan Pelletier; Kelvin Ng; Wajd Alkabbani; Youssef Labib; Nicolas Mourad; John-Michael Gamble
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2021-01-26

7.  Pooled Safety and Tolerability Analysis of Empagliflozin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Ona Kinduryte Schorling; Douglas Clark; Isabella Zwiener; Stefan Kaspers; Jisoo Lee; Hristo Iliev
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.845

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.