| Literature DB >> 28913510 |
Hassan Hashemi1, Mehdi Khabazkhoob2,3, Abbasali Yekta4, Ebrahim Jafarzadehpour3, Hadi Ostadimoghaddam5, Haleh Kangari6.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence of pterygium and its determinants in the underserved, rural population of Iran.Entities:
Keywords: Middle East; Prevalence; Pterygium; Rural population
Year: 2016 PMID: 28913510 PMCID: PMC5587244 DOI: 10.1016/j.joco.2016.09.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Curr Ophthalmol ISSN: 2452-2325
The prevalence of pterygium in underserved, rural villages of Iran by gender, location, age, and educational level.
| n | Pterygium | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| % (95%CI) | |||
| Total | 3312 | 13.11 (11.75–14.47) | |
| Gender | Female | 1865 | 12.07 (10.30–13.84) |
| Male | 1447 | 14.99 (12.79–17.19) | |
| Location | Southwest | 1868 | 14.27 (12.38–16.17) |
| North | 1444 | 12.14 (10.13–14.15) | |
| Age (years) | <=5 | 132 | 0 |
| 6–20 | 772 | 0.19 (0.11–0.55) | |
| 21–30 | 447 | 5.75 (3.17–8.33) | |
| 31–40 | 493 | 16.43 (12.53–20.33) | |
| 41–50 | 523 | 21.04 (16.86–25.22) | |
| 51–60 | 457 | 23.05 (18.44–27.66) | |
| 61–70 | 229 | 28.57 (21.59–35.55) | |
| >70 | 258 | 20.33 (14.48–26.18) | |
| Education | Illiterate | 1105 | 20.13 (17.30–22.95) |
| Primary school | 981 | 13.08 (10.56–15.6) | |
| Guidance School | 354 | 9.68 (6.00–13.36) | |
| High school | 624 | 6.62 (4.29–8.95) | |
| College | 248 | 6.32 (2.70–9.94) |
CI: Confidence interval.
n: Number of participants was analyzed.
The association between pterygium with some factors by multiple regressions logistic.
| OR (95%CI) | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| City | (southwest/north) | 0.67 (0.52–0.88) | 0.004 |
| Age | years | 1.04 (1.03–1.04) | <0.001 |
| Sex | male/female | 1.28 (0.99–1.66) | 0.055 |
| Education | Illiterate | 1 | |
| Primary school | 1.01 (0.73–1.41) | 0.932 | |
| Guidance School | 0.91 (0.55–1.51) | 0.712 | |
| High school | 0.62 (0.39–0.99) | 0.045 | |
| College | 0.57 (0.30–1.10) | 0.091 |
OR: Odds ratio
CI: Confidence interval.
Summary of other worldwide studies concerning pterygium.
| Country | Age | Pterygium (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | >40 | 5.9 |
| China | >30 | 11.95 |
| Saudi Arabia | 17–82 | 0.074 |
| Singapore | >40 | 10.1 |
| India | >40 | 9.5 |
| Singapore | 40–79 | 12.3 |
| Tunisia | Not available | 2.4 |
| Australia | Not available | 19.6 |
| Iran | Not available | 1.3 |
| Indonesia | >21 | 10.0 |
| China (rural) | >50 | 10.53 |
| Australia | >20 | 9.3 |
| China (rural) | >50 | 6.4 |
| China (rural) | 55–85 | 3.76 |
| China | >40 | 17.9 |
| China | >40 | 14.49 |
| China | >40 | 2.9 |
| Nepal | >16 | 10.08 |
| India | >30 | 11.7 |
| Australia | >40 | 1.2 |
| India | >30 | 8.47 |
| Blue mountain | >49 | 7.3 |
| Iran | 40–64 | 9.4 |
| Japan | >40 | 13.1 |
| China (rural) | >30 | 6.0 |
| Japan | 40–74 | 4.4 |
| China (rural) | ≥50 | 39.0 |
| Greenland | Not available | 8.6 |
| Denmark | Not available | 0.7 |
| China (rural) | 18–94 | 1.2 |
| Global world (meta-analysis) | Not available | 10.2 |