| Literature DB >> 28913350 |
Shiang-Lin Liao1, Yi-Wen Lin1,2,3, Ching-Liang Hsieh1,3,4,5.
Abstract
Adult neuronal cells which can regenerate have been reported. The present study investigated whether acupuncture enhances neuronal regeneration in ischemic stroke rats. We established an ischemic stroke rat model by occluding the cerebral blood flow of the right middle cerebral artery for 15 minutes and then allowing reperfusion in Sprague-Dawley rats. The results indicated that, in these rats, 2 Hz electroacupuncture (EA) at both Zusanli (ST36) and Shangjuxu (ST37) acupoints reduced the infarction/hemisphere ratio 8 days after reperfusion and reduced the modified neurological severity score (mNSS) and increased the rotarod test time 4 and 8 days after reperfusion, respectively. In addition, 2 Hz reduced nestin immunoreactive cells in the penumbra area and the ischemic core area; 2 Hz EA also reduced Ki67 immunoreactive cells and increased glial fibrillary acidic protein immunoreactive cells in the penumbra area. These findings suggest that 2 Hz EA at the ST36 and ST37 acupoints has a neuroprotective role. However, additional studies are needed to further investigate these preliminary results.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28913350 PMCID: PMC5587926 DOI: 10.1155/2017/3178014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Effect of electroacupuncture (EA) on cerebral infarct and neurological deficits in ischemia–reperfusion-injured rats.
| Group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Control | Sham | EA1 | EA2 | |
| I/H ratio | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.73 ± 0.05 | 0.72 ± 0.04 | 0.23 ± 0.19 | 0.70 ± 0.06 |
|
| |||||
| mNSS | |||||
| Day 1 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 7.4 ± 0.7 | 7.2 ± 0.4 | 7.1 ± 0.3 | 7.1 ± 0.3 |
| Day 4 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 6.7 ± 0.8 | 6.5 ± 0.5 | 4.3 ± 0.9 | 4.8 ± 0.9 |
| Day 8 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 6.4 ± 0.7 | 6.2 ± 0.8 | 3.2 ± 0.7 | 4.2 ± 0.8 |
| RRT | |||||
| Day 4 | 169.1 ± 20.9 | 41.8 ± 13.7 | 58.4 ± 12.8 | 126.7 ± 38.3 | 91.5 ± 22.1 |
| Day 8 | 183.3 ± 13.9 | 49.8 ± 15.9 | 64.3 ± 18.7 | 156.7 ± 46.0 | 117.0 ± 23.7#¶ |
Data represent mean ± standard deviation. Normal: normal group; Control: control group; Sham: sham group; EA1: 2 Hz electroacupuncture treatment group; EA2: 15 Hz electroacupuncture group; I/H: infarction/hemisphere ratio; mNSS: modified neurological severity score; RRT: rotarod test; p < 0.001 compared with Normal; #p < 0.05 compared with Control; ¶p < 0.05 compared with Sham; †p < 0.05 compared with EA2; Day 1: 24 hours after reperfusion; Day 4: four days after reperfusion; Day 8: eight days after reperfusion; repeated measures analysis of variance, followed by Tukey's test.
Figure 1Effect of electroacupuncture (EA) on cerebral infarction in ischemia–reperfusion-injured rats. The ratios of ischemia/hemisphere in the control, sham, and EA2 groups were higher than that in the EA1 group. Normal: normal group; Control: control group; Sham: sham group; EA1: 2 Hz EA treatment group; EA2: 15 Hz EA treatment group; white color: ischemic infarction area; purple–red color: nonischemic infarction area.
Effect of EA on Ki67, GFAP, and nestin immunoreactive cells in ischemia–reperfusion-injured rats.
| Group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Control | Sham | EA1 | EA2 | |
| Ki67 (P) | 10.2 ± 11.4 | 122.0 ± 14.8 | 96.5 ± 13.2 | 47.0 ± 7.7# | 110.0 ± 17.5 |
| GFAP (P) | 16.5 ± 10.8 | 55.2 ± 16.4 | 49.8 ± 11.6 | 105.8 ± 13.8 | 58.3 ± 8.5 |
| Nestin (P) | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 290.7 ± 18.8 | 283.7 ± 23.2 | 92.3 ± 8.9 | 219.7 ± 23.7 |
| Nestin (IC) | 0.00 ± 0.0 | 409.0 ± 37.5 | 395.2 ± 18.5 | 181.7 ± 21.9 | 281.3 ± 22.5 |
Data represent mean ± standard deviation. Normal: normal group; Control: control group; Sham: sham group; EA1: 2-Hz electroacupuncture treatment group; EA2: 15-Hz electroacupuncture group; Ki67: Ki67 immunoreactive cells; GFAP: GFAP immunoreactive cells; Nestin: nestin immunoreactive cells; P: penumbra area; IC: ischemic core area; p < 0.001 compared with Normal; #p < 0.05 compared with Control; ¶p < 0.05 compared with Sham; †p < 0.05 compared with EA2; repeated measures analysis of variance, followed by Tukey's test.
Figure 2Effect of EA on Ki67 immunoreactive cells in ischemia–reperfusion-injured rats. The number of Ki67 immunoreactive cells increased in the control, sham, and EA2 groups in the penumbra area, but decreased in the EA1 group. Normal: normal group; Control: control group; Sham: sham group; EA1: 2 Hz EA treatment group; EA2: 15 Hz EA treatment group. Arrow means immunopositive cells.
Figure 3Effect of EA on glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) immunoreactive cells in ischemia–reperfusion-injured rats. The number of GFAP immunoreactive cells was higher in the EA1 group that in the control, sham, and EA2 groups in the penumbra area. Normal: normal group; Control: control group; Sham: sham group; EA1: 2 Hz EA treatment group; EA2: 15 Hz EA treatment group. Arrow means immunopositive cells.
Figure 4Effect of EA on nestin immunoreactive cells in ischemia–reperfusion-injured rats. The number of nestin immunoreactive cells increased in the control and sham groups in the penumbra and ischemic core areas, but decreased in those same areas in the EA1 and EA2 groups. Normal: normal group; Control: control group; Sham: sham group; EA1: 2 Hz EA treatment group; EA2: 15 Hz EA treatment group. Arrow means immunopositive cells.