Literature DB >> 28913293

Facial Flap Repositioning in Posttraumatic Facial Asymmetry.

Il Hwan Byun1, Dahn Byun2, Woo Yeol Baek1.   

Abstract

Perfect facial and body symmetry is an important aesthetic concept which is very difficult, if not impossible, to achieve. Yet, facial asymmetries are commonly encountered by plastic and reconstructive surgeons. Here, we present a case of posttraumatic facial asymmetry successfully treated with a unique concept of facial flap repositioning. A 25-year-old male patient visited our department with severe posttraumatic facial asymmetry. There was deviated nasal bone and implant to the right, and the actual facial appearance asymmetry was much more severe compared to the computed tomography, generally shifted to the right. After corrective rhinoplasty, we approached through intraoral incision, and much adhesion from previous surgeries was noted. We meticulously elevated the facial flap of both sides, mainly involving the cheeks. The elevated facial flap was shifted to the left, and after finding the appropriate location, we sutured the middle portion of the flap to the periosteum of anterior nasal spine for fixation. We successfully freed the deviated facial tissues and repositioned it to improve symmetry in a single stage operation. We conclude that facial flap repositioning is an effective technique for patients with multiple operation history, and such method can successfully apply to other body parts with decreased tissue laxity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Facial asymmetry; Surgical flap

Year:  2016        PMID: 28913293      PMCID: PMC5556846          DOI: 10.7181/acfs.2016.17.4.240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 2287-1152


  6 in total

Review 1.  Facial asymmetry: etiology, evaluation, and management.

Authors:  You-Wei Cheong; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  Chang Gung Med J       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug

2.  Simultaneous correction of hard- and soft-tissue facial asymmetry: combination of orthognathic surgery and face lift using a resorbable fixation device.

Authors:  Jin-Young Choi; Jae-Pyong Choi; Yong-Kwon Lee; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  A simple classification for surgical treatment planning of maxillomandibular asymmetry.

Authors:  J P Reyneke; P Tsakiris; F Kienle
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.651

4.  Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress.

Authors:  T K Shackelford; R J Larsen
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1997-02

Review 5.  Perspectives on craniofacial asymmetry. III. Common and/or well-known causes of asymmetry.

Authors:  M M Cohen
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 6.  Dental and facial asymmetries: a review.

Authors:  S E Bishara; P S Burkey; J G Kharouf
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.079

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.