Jorine A Roelants1, Koen F M Joosten2, Brigitte M A van der Geest3, Jessie M Hulst4, Irwin K M Reiss5, Marijn J Vermeulen6. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Intensive Care Unit, Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Dietetics, Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: m.j.vermeulen@erasmusmc.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Aggressive parenteral nutritional practices were implemented in clinical practice over a decade ago to prevent early growth retardation in preterm infants. We aimed to study adherence to current nutritional recommendations in a population of very preterm infants, and to evaluate growth in early life. METHODS: Preterm infants (gestational age <30 weeks and birth weight <1500 g) were included in a prospective observational cohort study. Data on parenteral and enteral intake were collected on days 1-7, 14, 21 and 28 (d28) of life. Growth data were collected at birth, at moment of maximal weight loss (dip), and either at discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit or at d28, whichever came first. Nutritional intakes were compared to recommendations of current guidelines. The target growth rate was 15-20 g/kg/d. RESULTS: Fifty-nine infants (63% male) were included. Median gestational age was 27 3/7 (interquartile range 25 6/7;28 4/7), and birth weight was 920 g (720;1200). Median macronutrient intakes were within or above the targets on all study days, but energy targets were not met before day 5. Median growth rates were 9.5 and 18.1 g/kg/d, when calculated from respectively birth and dip to discharge/d28. Eight (14%) versus 46 (78%) infants met the growth targets, when evaluated from respectively birth and dip to discharge/d28. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, only energy intake up to day 5 was lower than recommended. Growth targets were achieved in the majority of the infants, but only when evaluated from dip onward, not from birth.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Aggressive parenteral nutritional practices were implemented in clinical practice over a decade ago to prevent early growth retardation in preterm infants. We aimed to study adherence to current nutritional recommendations in a population of very preterm infants, and to evaluate growth in early life. METHODS: Preterm infants (gestational age <30 weeks and birth weight <1500 g) were included in a prospective observational cohort study. Data on parenteral and enteral intake were collected on days 1-7, 14, 21 and 28 (d28) of life. Growth data were collected at birth, at moment of maximal weight loss (dip), and either at discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit or at d28, whichever came first. Nutritional intakes were compared to recommendations of current guidelines. The target growth rate was 15-20 g/kg/d. RESULTS: Fifty-nine infants (63% male) were included. Median gestational age was 27 3/7 (interquartile range 25 6/7;28 4/7), and birth weight was 920 g (720;1200). Median macronutrient intakes were within or above the targets on all study days, but energy targets were not met before day 5. Median growth rates were 9.5 and 18.1 g/kg/d, when calculated from respectively birth and dip to discharge/d28. Eight (14%) versus 46 (78%) infants met the growth targets, when evaluated from respectively birth and dip to discharge/d28. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, only energy intake up to day 5 was lower than recommended. Growth targets were achieved in the majority of the infants, but only when evaluated from dip onward, not from birth.
Authors: V A A Beunders; J A Roelants; J Suurland; J Dudink; P Govaert; R M C Swarte; M M A Kouwenberg-Raets; I K M Reiss; K F M Joosten; M J Vermeulen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Victoria A A Beunders; Jorine A Roelants; Jessie M Hulst; Dimitris Rizopoulos; Anita C S Hokken-Koelega; Esther G Neelis; Kirsten S de Fluiter; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Irwin K M Reiss; Koen F M Joosten; Marijn J Vermeulen Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Inge A L P van Beijsterveldt; Victoria A A Beunders; Alja Bijlsma; Marijn J Vermeulen; Koen F M Joosten; Anita C S Hokken-Koelega Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-03-14 Impact factor: 4.241