| Literature DB >> 28912002 |
Julian H Elliott1, Anneliese Synnot2, Tari Turner3, Mark Simmonds4, Elie A Akl5, Steve McDonald3, Georgia Salanti6, Joerg Meerpohl7, Harriet MacLehose8, John Hilton8, David Tovey8, Ian Shemilt9, James Thomas9.
Abstract
Systematic reviews are difficult to keep up to date, but failure to do so leads to a decay in review currency, accuracy, and utility. We are developing a novel approach to systematic review updating termed "Living systematic review" (LSR): systematic reviews that are continually updated, incorporating relevant new evidence as it becomes available. LSRs may be particularly important in fields where research evidence is emerging rapidly, current evidence is uncertain, and new research may change policy or practice decisions. We hypothesize that a continual approach to updating will achieve greater currency and validity, and increase the benefits to end users, with feasible resource requirements over time.Entities:
Keywords: Evidence synthesis; Guidelines; Living guidelines; Living systematic review; Systematic review
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28912002 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Epidemiol ISSN: 0895-4356 Impact factor: 6.437