Literature DB >> 28911922

Neoadjuvant sorafenib, gemcitabine, and cisplatin administration preceding cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma: An open-label, single-arm, single-center, phase 2 study.

Andrea Necchi1, Salvatore Lo Vullo2, Daniele Raggi3, Federica Perrone4, Patrizia Giannatempo3, Giuseppina Calareso5, Elena Togliardi6, Nicola Nicolai7, Luigi Piva7, Davide Biasoni7, Mario Catanzaro7, Tullio Torelli7, Silvia Stagni7, Maurizio Colecchia4, Adele Busico4, Marzia Pennati8, Nadia Zaffaroni8, Luigi Mariani2, Roberto Salvioni7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIUBC) should be improved. Sorafenib was combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy (SGC) in an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial (NCT01222676). PATIENTS AND METHODS: After transurethral resection of the bladder, T2-T4a N0 patients received four cycles of SGC followed by cystectomy. Sorafenib 400mg q12h daily, continuously, was added to standard GC chemotherapy. In a Simon's 2-stage design, the primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pT0), assuming H0: ≤0.20 and H1: ≥0.40, with a type I and type II error of 5% and 10%, respectively.
RESULTS: From April 2011 to June 2016, 46 patients were enrolled. Pathologic T0 response was obtained in 20 patients (43.5%, 95% CI: 28.9-58.9); pT ≤ 1 in 25 (54.3%, 95% CI: 39.0-69.1). After a median follow-up of 35 months, the median progression-free survival was not reached (NR, interquartile range: 23.6-NR), nor was median overall survival (interquartile range: 30.3-NR). Hematologic and extrahematologic grade 3 to 4 adverse events occurred in 45.6% and 26.1% of patients, respectively. In 29 samples from responders (pT ≤ 1) and nonresponders, different distribution of missense mutations involved DNA-repair genes, RAS-RAF pathway genes, chromatin-remodeling genes, and HER-family genes. ERCC1 immunohistochemical expression was associated with pT ≤ 1 response (P = 0.047). The absence of a comparator arm prevented us to quantify sorafenib contribution.
CONCLUSIONS: SGC combination was active in MIUBC, and the identified molecular features included alterations that may help personalize treatment in MIUBC with new more potent targeted agents, combined with chemotherapy.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; Chemotherapy; Neoadjuvant therapy; Sorafenib; Urothelial carcinoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28911922     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.08.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  2 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Perspectives of ERCC1 in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Konstantinos Koutsoukos; Angeliki Andrikopoulou; Nikos Dedes; Flora Zagouri; Aristotelis Bamias; Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Smoking status and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among patients with bladder cancer: a pooled analysis.

Authors:  Tongchen He; Jiao Hu; Dongxu Qiu; Hao Deng; Jian Hu; Jinbo Chen; Xiongbing Zu
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.