| Literature DB >> 28911707 |
L Polechońska1, M Dambiec1, A Klink2, A Rudecki1.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the concentrations of heavy metals in bagged and leaf black teas of the same brand and evaluate the percentage transfer of metals to tea infusion to assess the consumer exposure. Ten leaf black teas and 10 bagged black teas of the same brand available in Poland were analyzed for Zn, Mn, Cd, Pb, Ni, Co, Cr, Al, and Fe concentrations both in dry material and their infusion. The bagged teas contained higher amounts of Pb, Mn, Fe, Ni, Al, and Cr compared with leaf teas of the same brand, whereas the infusions of bagged tea contained higher levels of Mn, Ni, Al, and Cr compared with leaf tea infusions. Generally, the most abundant trace metals in both types of tea were Al and Mn. There was a wide variation in percentage transfer of elements from the dry tea materials to the infusions. The solubility of Ni and Mn was the highest, whereas Fe was insoluble and only a small portion of this metal content may leach into infusion. With respect to the acceptable daily intake of metals, the infusions of both bagged and leaf teas analyzed were found to be safe for human consumption.Entities:
Keywords: solubility; tea; tea beverages; trace metals
Year: 2015 PMID: 28911707 PMCID: PMC9351806 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfda.2014.08.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Food Drug Anal Impact factor: 6.157
Description of studied brands of commercially purchased black teas.
| Tea type | Tea sample | Name | Producer/importer | Origin | Steeping time (min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bagged tea | 1 | Tetley classic | TATA Global Beverages Polska Sp. Z o.o., Poland | Indefinite origins | 3 |
| 2 | Lloyd tea ceylon | Mokate S.A., Poland | Sri Lanka | 4–5 | |
| 3 | Dilmah ceylon gold | MJF Holdings Ltd., Sri Lanka | Sri Lanka | 3–5 | |
| 4 | Sir Roger yunnan | Roger Sp. z o.o., Poland | China | 3–5 | |
| 5 | Posti yunnan | Posti S.A., Poland | China | 4–6 | |
| 6 | Lipton yellow label tea | Unilever Polska Sp. z o.o., Poland | Indefinite origins | 1–2 | |
| 7 | Ahmad tea English No.1 | Ahmad tea Ltd | Sri Lanka | ||
| 8 | Posti ceylon | PH-W “POSTI” S.A., Poland | Sri Lanka | 4–6 | |
| 9 | Oskar black tea bags yunnan style | Oskar International Trading Sp. Z o.o., Poland | China | — | |
| 10 | Irving daily classic | Amber Spark S.A., Poland | Indefinite origins | 2–3 | |
| Leaf tea | 11 | Tetley classic | TATA Global Beverages Polska Sp. Z o.o., Poland | Indefinite origins | 3 |
| 12 | Lloyd ceylon | Mokate S.A., Poland | Sri Lanka | 5–7 | |
| 13 | Dilmah ceylon gold | MJF Holdings Ltd., Sri Lanka | Sri Lanka | 3–5 | |
| 14 | Sir Roger yunnan | Roger Sp. z o.o., Poland | China | 3–5 | |
| 15 | Posti yunnan | Posti S.A., Poland | China | 4–6 | |
| 16 | Lipton yellow label tea | Unilever Polska Sp. z o.o., Poland | Indefinite origins | 3–5 | |
| 17 | Ahmad tea English No.1 | Ahmad Tea Ltd., UK | Sri Lanka | 4–6 | |
| 18 | Posti ceylon | PH-W “POSTI” S.A., Poland | Sri Lanka | 4–6 | |
| 19 | Oskar gold yunnan black tea | Oskar International Trading Sp. z o.o., Poland | China | 3–5 | |
| 20 | Irving daily superior | Amber Spark S.A., Poland | India | 3–5 |
According to the instructions given by tradesmen.
The operating conditions of atomic absorption spectrometer.
| Al | Cd | Co | Cr | Fe | Pb | Mn | Ni | Zn | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wavelength (nm) | 309.3 | 228.8 | 357.9 | 240.7 | 248.3 | 217.0 | 279.5 | 232.0 | 213.9 |
| Slit width (nm) | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
| Lamp currents (mA) | 10.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Flame type | Air–C2H2 | Air–C2H2 | Air–C2H2 | Air–C2H2 |
Validation of analytical method.
| Figures of merit | Al | Cd | Co | Cr | Fe | Pb | Mn | Ni | Zn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOD | 0.027 (μg/mL) | 0.06 (μg/L) | 0. 66 (μg/L) | 0.19 (μg/L) | 0.033 (μg/mL) | 0.76 (μg/L) | 0.044 (μg/mL) | 0.59 (μg/L) | 0.009 (μg/mL) |
| LOQ | 0.081 (μg/mL) | 0.18 (μg/L) | 1.25 (μg/L) | 0.58 (μg/L) | 0.10 (μg/mL) | 2.29 (μg/L) | 0.13 (μg/mL) | 1.78 (μg/L) | 0.027 (μg/mL) |
| Accuracy (%) | 101.87 | 92.86 | 97.44 | 101.74 | 104.41 | 94.79 | 96.76 | 101.76 | 102.66 |
| Precision (%) | 2.51 | 2.73 | 4.31 | 3.51 | 1.10 | 4.79 | 0.86 | 2.96 | 1.51 |
| Linearity | |||||||||
| Correlation coefficient ( | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.996 | 0.999 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.998 |
LOD = limit of detection; LOQ = limit of quantification.
Mean concentration of trace metals in dry tea material (each value is the mean of three samples).
| Tea type | Tea sample | Mn | Zn | Cd | Pb | Ni | Co | Cr | Al | Fe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bagged tea | 1 | 941 | 30.5 | 0.0069 | 1.51 | 6.20 | 0.09 | 7.10 | 761 | 239 |
| 2 | 738 | 29.6 | 0.035 | 1.31 | 3.25 | 0.18 | 3.19 | 584 | 328 | |
| 3 | 313 | 30.4 | 0.042 | 1.07 | 2.72 | ND | 1.20 | 407 | 165 | |
| 4 | 963 | 28.6 | 0.025 | 1.38 | 3.75 | 0.18 | 3.31 | 567 | 305 | |
| 5 | 1169 | 27.5 | 0.050 | 2.31 | 4.57 | 0.35 | 3.04 | 961 | 464 | |
| 6 | 1321 | 24.9 | 0.023 | 1.36 | 5.22 | 0.13 | 8.18 | 348 | 226 | |
| 7 | 891 | 23.6 | 0.023 | 1.28 | 3.57 | 0.16 | 4.04 | 375 | 135 | |
| 8 | 524 | 28.7 | 0.015 | 3.24 | 2.09 | 0.14 | 1.09 | 393 | 287 | |
| 9 | 608 | 26.4 | 0.022 | 1.31 | 4.73 | 0.16 | 1.83 | 350 | 181 | |
| 10 | 1396 | 20.7 | 0.026 | 2.15 | 9.24 | 0.54 | 11.49 | 904 | 270 | |
| Mean ± SD | 886 ± 340 | 27.1 ± 3.1 | 0.027 ± 0.012 | 1.69 ± 0.66 | 4.53 ± 2.05 | 0.21 ± 0.15 | 4.45 ± 3.32 | 565 ± 229 | 260 ± 93 | |
| Leaf tea | 11 | 670 | 27.4 | 0.018 | 0.93 | 7.76 | 0.23 | 2.40 | 840 | 383 |
| 12 | 505 | 23.4 | 0.010 | 1.41 | 3.09 | 0.18 | 1.00 | 302 | 141 | |
| 13 | 277 | 37.3 | 0.157 | 0.84 | 2.50 | ND | 0.26 | 402 | 141 | |
| 14 | 704 | 23.6 | 0.020 | 0.85 | 3.08 | ND | 1.06 | 373 | 139 | |
| 15 | 860 | 24.4 | 0.032 | 1.06 | 3.84 | 0.45 | 2.34 | 439 | 318 | |
| 16 | 744 | 21.2 | 0.033 | 0.89 | 3.47 | 0.38 | 1.23 | 366 | 166 | |
| 17 | 461 | 23.2 | 0.177 | 0.54 | 1.68 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 282 | 103 | |
| 18 | 604 | 27.1 | 0.013 | 1.20 | 3.27 | 0.25 | 0.78 | 465 | 164 | |
| 19 | 565 | 33.5 | 0.033 | 0.84 | 4.19 | ND | 0.60 | 193 | 182 | |
| 20 | 648 | 27.9 | 0.022 | 0.94 | 3.06 | 0.19 | 1.04 | 243 | 100 | |
| Mean ± SD | 604 ± 159 | 26.0 ± 4.9 | 0.052 ± 0.06 | 0.95 ± 0.23 | 3.59 ± 1.62 | 0.26 ± 0.12 | 1.09 ± 0.74 | 391 ± 175 | 184 ± 91 |
ND = no detection level (limit of detection: Co, 0.066 mg/kg).
Mean concentration of trace metals in tea infusion (each value is the mean of three samples).
| Tea type | Tea sample | Mn | Zn | Cd | Pb | Ni | Co | Cr | Al | Fe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bagged tea | 1 | 168 | 7.28 | ND | 0.055 | 4.28 | ND | 0.83 | 606 | 4.30 |
| 2 | 149 | 8.12 | ND | 0.194 | 2.93 | ND | 0.47 | 433 | 4.00 | |
| 3 | 77 | 8.78 | ND | 0.041 | 2.66 | ND | 0.19 | 260 | 2.51 | |
| 4 | 166 | 7.50 | ND | 0.245 | 2.69 | ND | 0.79 | 299 | 3.03 | |
| 5 | 143 | 5.83 | ND | 0.133 | 3.12 | ND | 0.47 | 355 | 4.82 | |
| 6 | 402 | 9.26 | ND | 0.060 | 4.04 | ND | 1.19 | 214 | 2.00 | |
| 7 | 258 | 9.21 | ND | 0.237 | 3.40 | ND | 0.87 | 298 | 1.82 | |
| 8 | 122 | 8.24 | ND | 0.396 | 1.94 | ND | 0.11 | 160 | 5.17 | |
| 9 | 150 | 9.59 | ND | 0.087 | 3.47 | ND | 0.38 | 149 | 4.48 | |
| 10 | 228 | 5.29 | ND | 0.267 | 6.00 | ND | 1.41 | 563 | 2.67 | |
| Mean ± SD | 186 ± 89 | 7.91 ± 1.42 | — | 0.17 ± 0.13 | 3.45 ± 1.13 | — | 0.67 ± 0.41 | 334 ± 154 | 3.48 ± 1.23 | |
| Leaf tea | 11 | 105 | 6.56 | ND | 0.151 | 5.09 | ND | 0.52 | 339 | 3.46 |
| 12 | 77 | 5.98 | ND | 0.136 | 1.66 | ND | 0.17 | 122 | 2.43 | |
| 13 | 104 | 11.14 | ND | 0.112 | 1.34 | ND | 0.15 | 199 | 3.91 | |
| 14 | 113 | 6.82 | ND | 0.214 | 1.77 | ND | 0.32 | 119 | 3.73 | |
| 15 | 60 | 5.45 | ND | 0.133 | 1.77 | 0.210 | 0.41 | 147 | 4.13 | |
| 16 | 136 | 5.18 | ND | 0.179 | 2.64 | 0.227 | 0.49 | 209 | 2.25 | |
| 17 | 86 | 7.23 | ND | 0.069 | 1.24 | ND | 0.15 | 119 | 2.87 | |
| 18 | 120 | 7.92 | ND | 0.113 | 2.10 | 0.141 | 0.29 | 235 | 7.18 | |
| 19 | 115 | 12.14 | ND | 0.021 | 1.50 | ND | 0.40 | 57 | 3.51 | |
| 20 | 108 | 7.21 | ND | 0.090 | 1.30 | ND | 0.23 | 86 | 4.02 | |
| Mean ± SD | 102 ± 22 | 7.56 ± 2.26 | ND | 0.12 ± 0.05 | 2.04 ± 1.15 | — | 0.31 ± 0.14 | 163 ± 81 | 3.75 ± 1.33 |
ND = no detection level (limit of detection: Cd, 0.006 mg/kg; Co, 0.066 mg/kg).
The expected calculated intake of elements with tea infusion and average daily intakes.
| Element | Content in 1 cup (100 mL) (mg) | Daily intake with tea infusion (mg/d) | Dietary reference intakes (mg/d) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| Bagged tea | Leaf tea | Bagged tea | Leaf tea | ||
| Mn | 0.37 | 0.20 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.8–2.3 |
| Zn | 0.016 | 0.015 | 0.047 | 0.045 | 8–11 |
| Pb | 0.00034 | 0.00024 | 0.0010 | 0.0007 | — |
| Ni | 0.0069 | 0.0041 | 0.021 | 0.012 | — |
| Co | — | 0.00039 | — | 0.0012 | — |
| Cr | 0.00134 | 0.00062 | 0.0040 | 0.0019 | 0.025 |
| Al | 0.67 | 0.33 | 2.00 | 0.98 | 5 |
| Fe | 0.0070 | 0.0075 | 0.021 | 0.022 | 10–18 |
The amounts were calculated based on the concentration of element in tea infusion and on the assumption that the average consumption of tea beverage for single person is three cups a day with one packet of 2 g (for each).
Institute of Medicine [37].
Jarosz [35].
World Health Organization [16].