| Literature DB >> 28911471 |
Abstract
In the presence of Britton-Robinson buffer solution (pH = 9.5) and surfactant of Tween-80, fluorescence intensity of calcein was quenched by Pd2+. However, the fluorescence intensity can be enhanced after adding a certain concentration of L-arginine, and the rate of the enhancement showed a good liner relationship with the added amount of L-arginine. We then established a fluorescence spectrometry for the determination of L-arginine. In addition, the linear range, along with detection limit, was different when the slit width changed. Thus, we could use a different slit width to meet our requirements according to the samples we treated. By testing actual samples and the reliability of our method, we found that our method was reliable for determining the content of L-arginine in Radix isatidis.Entities:
Keywords: Calcein; Fluorescence probe; L-arginine; Radix isatidis
Year: 2014 PMID: 28911471 PMCID: PMC9355012 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfda.2014.04.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Food Drug Anal Impact factor: 6.157
Fig. 1System of fluorescence spectra diagram for Pd2+-calcein and Pd2+-calcein-L-arginine. [Pd2+-calcein]: 1.4 × 10−5 mol/L, pH = 9.5; [L-arginine]: (a) 10 mg/L, (b) 20 mg/L; [B-R]: 1.8 × 10−5 mol/L.
Influence of coexistences.
| Coexisting substance | Concentration (mg/L) | Relative error (%) | Coexisting substance | Concentration (mg/L) | Relative error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cl− | 0.468 | +4.1 |
| 34 | −4.4 |
| Na+ | 0.468 | +4.1 | Sucrose | 960 | 5.6 |
| K+ | 0.746 | −4.2 | Lactose | 230 | +4.8 |
| Ca2+ | 0.123 | −4.4 | L-proline | 0.0015 | +4.7 |
| Mg2+ | 0.7 | +4.7 | Glucose | 275 | +4.8 |
| Zn2+ | 3220 | −4.6 | Maltose | 75 | +4.2 |
| Fe3+ | 1.7 | −4.5 | Valine | 0.1 | +4.9 |
| Cu2+ | 0.06 | +4.4 | Glutamate | 0.6 | +4.1 |
| L-leucine | 0.016 | +5.2 | D/L-methionine | 0.008 | −5.3 |
Fig. 2The reaction between calcein and Pd2+.
Fig. 3Reaction rate.
Results of sample determination using our method and GB.
| Sample 1 | Sample 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Measured values using our method (mg/mL) | 22.525, 22.325, 22.320, 22.530 | 22.575, 22.925, 22.637, 22.863 |
| Average value using our method (mg/mL) | 22.425 | 22.75 |
| Average value using method of GB (mg/mL) | 22.237 | 22.523 |
| RSD (%) | 0.798 | 1.295 |
GB = National standards of China; RSD = relative standard deviation.