| Literature DB >> 28911435 |
Hsiu-Fang Yen1, Chi-Ting Hsieh2, Tusty-Jiuan Hsieh3, Fang-Rong Chang4, Chin-Kun Wang5.
Abstract
Twenty-nine commercial essential oil (EO) products that were purchased from the Taiwan market, including three different company-made Melissa officinalis essential oils, were assayed on their glucose consumption activity and lipid accumulation activity on 3T3-L1 adipocytes. The EOs of M. officinalis were significantly active in both model assays. By contrast, EOs of peppermint, lavender, bergamot, cypress, niaouli nerolidol, geranium-rose, and revensara did not increase glucose consumption activity from media, but displayed inhibited lipid accumulation activity (65-90% of lipid accumulation vs. the control 100%). Because of the promising activity of M. officinalis EOs, three different products were collected and compared for their gas chromatography chemical profiles and bioactivity. The Western blot data suggest that the key factors of the adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase/acetyl-CoA carboxylase pathway can be mediated by M. officinalis EOs. Together with biodata, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry profiles suggested mixtures of citrals and minor compounds of M. officinalis EOs may play an important role on effect of antidiabetes.Entities:
Keywords: Melissa officinalis; antidiabetes; essential oils
Year: 2014 PMID: 28911435 PMCID: PMC9351752 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfda.2014.02.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Food Drug Anal Impact factor: 6.157
Data of glucose consumption and lipid drop accumulation of treatment with control, insulin, and 29 essential oils on 3T3-L1 adipocytes.
| No. | Name | Scientific name | Family | Glucose consumption, % | Oil drop accumulation, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lemon balm-A |
| Lamiaceae | 63.64 ± 11.46 | 66.48 ± 0.33 |
| 2 | Lemon balm-B |
| Lamiaceae | 59.96 ± 3.65 | 83.75 ± 7.54 |
| 3 | Lemon balm-C |
| Lamiaceae | 65.63 ± 9.76 | 53.78 ± 9.73 |
| 4 | Spanish-Sage |
| Lamiaceae | 34.30 ± 8.79 | 130.46 ± 7.20 |
| 5 | Rosemary |
| Lamiaceae | 32.76 ± 7.54 | 130.46 ± 4.14 |
| 6 | Marjoram |
| Lamiaceae | 32.94 ± 7.84 | 152.11 ± 2.32 |
| 7 | Peppermint |
| Lamiaceae | 42.92 ± 4.58 | 66.09 ± 0.57 |
| 8 | Lavender |
| Lamiaceae | 35.67 ± 7.57 | 83.91 ± 1.72 |
| 9 | Thyme |
| Lamiaceae | 41.72 ± 10.47 | 96.17 ± 3.17 |
| 10 | Basil | Lamiaceae | 41.12 ± 7.08 | 106.84 ± 5.95 | |
| 11 | Orange |
| Rutaceae | 39.39 ± 8.43 | 122.03 ± 2.89 |
| 12 | Bergamot |
| Rutaceae | 36.60 ± 7.35 | 90.42 ± 1.20 |
| 13 | Lemon |
| Rutaceae | 38.01 ± 8.00 | 96.55 ± 2.30 |
| 14 | Mandarin |
| Rutaceae | 42.94 ± 10.88 | 109.96 ± 2.02 |
| 15 | Grapefruit |
| Rutaceae | 38.78 ± 6.22 | 105.94 ± 2.18 |
| 16 | Tea tree |
| Myrtaceae | 32.94 ± 5.29 | 97.70 ± 1.52 |
| 17 |
|
| Myrtaceae | 42.89 ± 8.73 | 91.57 ± 1.20 |
| 18 | Eucalyptus |
| Myrtaceae | 32.94 ± 7.53 | 110.34 ± 2.51 |
| 19 | Cypress |
| Cupressaceae | 32.94 ± 6.55 | 89.66 ± 1.99 |
| 20 | Cedarwood |
| Cupressaceae | 34.18 ± 8.10 | 134.10 ± 2.32 |
| 21 | Juniper-Berry |
| Cupressaceae | 38.42 ± 7.64 | 107.28 ± 1.85 |
| 22 | Black pepper |
| Piperaceae | 37.13 ± 6.56 | 131.61 ± 3.20 |
| 23 | Frankincense |
| Burseraceae | 35.07 ± 6.91 | 106.51 ± 2.59 |
| 24 | Ginger |
| Zingiberaceae | 38.99 ± 7.84 | 166.67 ± 3.04 |
| 25 | Geranium-rose |
| Geraniaceae | 42.54 ± 6.74 | 76.05 ± 1.45 |
| 26 | Fennel |
| Apiaceae | 34.81 ± 7.17 | 93.49 ± 0.88 |
| 27 | Chamomile-Roman |
| Asteraceae | 35.87 ± 8.49 | 100.77 ± 1.76 |
| 28 | Pine |
| Pinaceae | 44.95 ± 8.22 | 92.15 ± 1.66 |
| 29 | Revensara |
| Lauraceae | 42.73 ± 6.48 | 86.08 ± 4.96 |
| 30 | Insulin | 50.00 ± 4.85 | 135.82 ± 3.74 | ||
| 31 | Control | 27.46 ± 0.93 | 100.00 ± 0.91 |
p < 0.001.
Glucose consumption% = medium glucose concentration/450 mg/dL, result compared with control,
p < 0.001,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.05.
Oil drop accumulation % = (Sample Oil-red O stain result OD value/Control Oil-red O stain result OD value), result compared with control.
Fig. 1Oil-Red O staining results of the lipid drop accumulation assay for control, insulin and three Melissa essential oils treatments on 3T3-L1 adipocytes.
Fig. 2Effect of control, insulin and each dose of the lemon balm-A essential oil on the regulation of glucose and adipogenic transcription factors, such as p-AMPK, AMPK, p-ACC, ACC, PPAR, CEBPα, and SREBP1, determined by Western blot analysis. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05.
Fig. 3Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry total ion chromatograms for different lemon balm essential oils: (A) lemon balm-A, (B) lemon balm-B, and (C) lemon balm-C.
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analytic data for six major compounds of three Melissa essential oils products.
| Peak | Compound name | RT | LB-A | LB-B | LB-C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Limonene | 12.04 | 26.26 | 24.47 | 2.29 |
| 2 | β-Citronellal | 20.01 | 29.26 | 45.85 | 4.51 |
| 3 | β-Citral | 25.87 | 14.47 | 12.7 | 12.92 |
| 4 | α-Citral | 28.06 | 8.46 | 5.86 | 10.25 |
| 5 | Caryophyllene | 36.92 | 0.65 | 0.37 | 31.24 |
| 6 | Germacrene D | 39.21 | 2.23 | 1.16 | 15.55 |
RT = retention time, minutes.
Relative contribution (%) of component from each lemon balm essential oils product.