Literature DB >> 28911153

Estrogen Receptor α, a Sex-Dependent Predictor of Aggressiveness in Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas: SSTR and Sex Hormone Receptor Distribution in NFPA.

Kristin Astrid Øystese1,2,3, Olivera Casar-Borota4,5,6, Kjersti Ringvoll Normann2,3, Manuela Zucknick7, Jens Petter Berg2,8, Jens Bollerslev1,2.   

Abstract

Context: Nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) are fairly common and require a multidisciplinary approach. Reliable markers of a clinically aggressive course are lacking. Medical treatment is not available, and transsphenoidal surgery is the preferred primary treatment. Objective: We aimed to characterize the somatostatin, estrogen, and progesterone receptor distribution for NFPAs and compare it with factors of tumor aggressiveness. Design: Tumor samples for immunohistochemistry (n = 145) and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (n = 106) analyses of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) 1, SSTR2, SSTR3, SSTR5, estrogen receptor α (ERα), and progesterone receptor (PR) were measured by immunoreactive score (IRS) and messenger RNA relative quantity and retrospectively compared with variables of aggressiveness. Setting: All patients were operated at the same tertiary referral center. Participants: A total of 164 patients with NFPA and tumor tissue from the primary operation were included.
Results: SSTR3 was expressed abundantly by immunohistochemistry in all NFPAs. The IRS of ERα correlated with that of SSTR2 in male patients only (males, P < 0.001; females, P = 0.8). Low ERα level was linked to a higher reintervention rate (P = 0.001) and earlier reintervention (P = 0.004) in male patients only (females, P = 0.95 and P = 0.65, respectively). Absence of ERα together with age provided a good prediction model for reintervention in male patients with gonadotroph adenomas. Conclusions: SSTR3 is expressed abundantly in NFPAs and is therefore a possible target for medical treatment. Absence of ERα together with young age may predict tumor recurrence in groups of NFPAs. Further validation in systematic prospective studies is needed.
Copyright © 2017 Endocrine Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28911153     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2017-00792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  16 in total

Review 1.  Advances and controversies in the classification and grading of pituitary tumors.

Authors:  E R Laws; D L Penn; C S Repetti
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 2.  Malignant transformation in non-functioning pituitary adenomas (pituitary carcinoma).

Authors:  Nèle Lenders; Ann McCormack
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 3.  Prognostic factors of regrowth in nonfunctioning pituitary tumors.

Authors:  Gerald Raverot; Alexandre Vasiljevic; Emmanuel Jouanneau
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.107

4.  The role of E and N-cadherin in the postoperative course of gonadotroph pituitary tumours.

Authors:  Kristin Astrid Berland Øystese; Jens Petter Berg; Kjersti Ringvoll Normann; Manuela Zucknick; Olivera Casar-Borota; Jens Bollerslev
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 5.  Aggressive pituitary tumours and pituitary carcinomas.

Authors:  Gérald Raverot; Mirela Diana Ilie; Hélène Lasolle; Vincent Amodru; Jacqueline Trouillas; Frédéric Castinetti; Thierry Brue
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 6.  Aggressive nonfunctioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Sérgio Portovedo; Leonardo Vieira Neto; Christina Maeda Takiya; Leandro Miranda-Alves; Paula Soares; Denise Pires de Carvalho
Journal:  Brain Tumor Pathol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Distribution of E- and N-cadherin in subgroups of non-functioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumours.

Authors:  Kristin Astrid B Øystese; Olivera Casar-Borota; Jon Berg-Johnsen; Jens Petter Berg; Jens Bollerslev
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.925

8.  Is there any gender difference in epidemiology, clinical presentation and co-morbidities of non-functioning pituitary adenomas? A prospective survey of a National Referral Center and review of the literature.

Authors:  C Di Somma; E Scarano; G de Alteriis; L Barrea; E Riccio; R Arianna; S Savastano; A Colao
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 9.  Histopathological classification of non-functioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Emilija Manojlovic-Gacic; Britt Edén Engström; Olivera Casar-Borota
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 10.  Aggressive Cushing's Disease: Molecular Pathology and Its Therapeutic Approach.

Authors:  Masaaki Yamamoto; Takahiro Nakao; Wataru Ogawa; Hidenori Fukuoka
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.