Yardena Arnoni-Bauer1,2, Atira Bick2, Noa Raz2, Tal Imbar3, Shoshana Amos1, Orly Agmon1, Limor Marko1, Netta Levin2, Ram Weiss1. 1. Department of Human Metabolism and Nutrition, Braun School of Public Health, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91120, Israel. 2. Functional MRI Unit, Neurology Department, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem 91120, Israel. 3. In Vitro Fertilization Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
Abstract
Context: Homeostatic energy balance is controlled via the hypothalamus, whereas regions controlling reward and cognitive decision-making are critical for hedonic eating. Eating varies across the menstrual cycle peaking at the midluteal phase. Objective: To test responses of females with regular cycles during midfollicular and midluteal phase and of users of monophasic oral contraception pills (OCPs) to visual food cues. Design: Participants performed a functional magnetic resonance imaging while exposed to visual food cues in four time points: fasting and fed conditions in midfollicular and midluteal phases. Patients: Twenty females with regular cycles and 12 on monophasic OCP, aged 18 to 35 years. Main Outcome Measures: Activity in homeostatic (hypothalamus), reward (amygdala, putamen and insula), frontal (anterior cingulate cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex), and visual regions (calcarine and lateral occipital cortex). Setting: Tertiary hospital. Results: In females with regular cycles, brain regions associated with homeostasis but also the reward system, executive frontal areas, and afferent visual areas were activated to a greater degree during the luteal compared with the follicular phase. Within the visual areas, a dual effect of hormonal and prandial state was seen. In females on monophasic OCPs, characterized by a permanently elevated progesterone concentration, activity reminiscent of the luteal phase was found. Androgen, cortisol, testosterone, and insulin levels were significantly correlated with reward and visual region activation. Conclusions: Hormonal mechanisms affect the responses of women's homeostatic, emotional, and attentional brain regions to food cues. The relation of these findings to eating behavior throughout the cycle needs further investigation.
Context: Homeostatic energy balance is controlled via the hypothalamus, whereas regions controlling reward and cognitive decision-making are critical for hedonic eating. Eating varies across the menstrual cycle peaking at the midluteal phase. Objective: To test responses of females with regular cycles during midfollicular and midluteal phase and of users of monophasic oral contraception pills (OCPs) to visual food cues. Design: Participants performed a functional magnetic resonance imaging while exposed to visual food cues in four time points: fasting and fed conditions in midfollicular and midluteal phases. Patients: Twenty females with regular cycles and 12 on monophasic OCP, aged 18 to 35 years. Main Outcome Measures: Activity in homeostatic (hypothalamus), reward (amygdala, putamen and insula), frontal (anterior cingulate cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex), and visual regions (calcarine and lateral occipital cortex). Setting: Tertiary hospital. Results: In females with regular cycles, brain regions associated with homeostasis but also the reward system, executive frontal areas, and afferent visual areas were activated to a greater degree during the luteal compared with the follicular phase. Within the visual areas, a dual effect of hormonal and prandial state was seen. In females on monophasic OCPs, characterized by a permanently elevated progesterone concentration, activity reminiscent of the luteal phase was found. Androgen, cortisol, testosterone, and insulin levels were significantly correlated with reward and visual region activation. Conclusions: Hormonal mechanisms affect the responses of women's homeostatic, emotional, and attentional brain regions to food cues. The relation of these findings to eating behavior throughout the cycle needs further investigation.
Authors: Joe J Simon; Marion A Stopyra; Esther Mönning; Sebastian Sailer; Nora Lavandier; Lars P Kihm; Martin Bendszus; Hubert Preissl; Wolfgang Herzog; Hans-Christoph Friederich Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2020-08-03 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Steven Jett; Eva Schelbaum; Grace Jang; Camila Boneu Yepez; Jonathan P Dyke; Silky Pahlajani; Roberta Diaz Brinton; Lisa Mosconi Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2022-07-19 Impact factor: 5.702
Authors: Kristina T Legget; Marc-Andre Cornier; Daniel H Bessesen; Brianne Mohl; Elizabeth A Thomas; Jason R Tregellas Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2017-12-13 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Carolin A Lewis; Ann-Christin S Kimmig; Rachel G Zsido; Alexander Jank; Birgit Derntl; Julia Sacher Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2019-11-07 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Andre K Portella; Afroditi Papantoni; Antoneta T Joseph; Liuyi Chen; Richard S Lee; Patricia P Silveira; Laurette Dube; Susan Carnell Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Liya Kerem; Nouchine Hadjikhani; Laura Holsen; Elizabeth A Lawson; Franziska Plessow Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 5.095