Literature DB >> 28910800

The Place of Large Pore Membranes in the Treatment Portfolio of Patients on Hemodialysis.

Wim Van Biesen, Raymond Vanholder, Eva Schepers, Griet Glorieux, Annemieke Dhondt, Sunny Eloot.   

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease is a major concern in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Inflammation induced by retention of uremic toxins, of which a substantial fraction has a molecular weight in the middle molecular range, has been associated with increased cardiovascular risk. In an attempt to reduce inflammation and thus cardiovascular toxicity in patients with ESKD, hemodiafiltration (HDF) has been promoted to enhance the clearance of middle molecular weight substances during dialysis. However, HDF increases the technical complexity and costs, and requires ultrapure dialysis fluid. Also, HDF becomes less beneficial when it is not possible to achieve sufficient convective volume in all patients. Over the last years, membranes with larger pore sizes, such as medium cut-off and high cut-off, have been introduced. These membranes, applied in hemodialysis mode, appear to have removal rates of middle molecular weight molecules that are comparable to those achieved with HDF, and could thus obviate the need for HDF. However, ultrapure dialysis fluid might still be required if there is a risk of transmigration of contaminants from the dialysate side into the blood because of the increased pore size. This transmigration of pyrogens might upregulate the expression of cytokines and other pro-inflammatory factors, and thus completely neutralize the beneficial effects of higher clearance of middle molecules. This chapter will explore the existing evidence on permeability of membranes with large pores for bacterial degradation products, and based on this information we will try to define the position of these novel membranes among the spectrum of existing membranes.
© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28910800     DOI: 10.1159/000479265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contrib Nephrol        ISSN: 0302-5144            Impact factor:   1.580


  2 in total

1.  A randomized cross-over study with objective quantification of the performance of an asymmetric triacetate and a polysulfone dialysis membrane using different anticoagulation strategies.

Authors:  Floris Vanommeslaeghe; Iván Josipovic; Matthieu Boone; Annemie Dhondt; Wim Van Biesen; Sunny Eloot
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2019-12-22

2.  Prescribing Hemodialysis or Hemodiafiltration: When One Size Does Not Fit All the Proposal of a Personalized Approach Based on Comorbidity and Nutritional Status.

Authors:  Giorgina Barbara Piccoli; Louise Nielsen; Lurilyn Gendrot; Antioco Fois; Emanuela Cataldo; Gianfranca Cabiddu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.