| Literature DB >> 28910358 |
Patrícia Silva1, Alice Delerue Matos2, Roberto Martinez-Pecino3.
Abstract
The changing demographic structure of the population, resulting in unparalleled growth of the elderly population, means that e-inclusion of this population group is considered to be a social and political priority in the context of the Information Society. Most research studies have only considered individual variables -such as age, gender, education, income and health- in the explanatory models of e-inclusion of senior citizens, while ignoring macro variables, such as the welfare systems and public policies in each country. Simultaneously, most studies focus on small-scale samples, lack international comparisons and do not consider the combined effect of several variables that influence Internet use. This study aims to analyse possible differences between two countries that have different welfare systems and public policies, after controlling for the effects of the individual variables that have been identified in the literature as relevant for Internet use. The study focuses on a sample of 8639 individuals, aged 50 years and over, residing in Portugal and Estonia, who participated in the SHARE project (Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe). The results of the logistic regression analysis demonstrate that welfare systems and public policies have an impact on the likelihood of Internet use, thus reinforcing the importance of developing public policies to foster e-inclusion of senior citizens.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28910358 PMCID: PMC5598973 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184545
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of Internet users and non-users in the sample.
| Users | Non-users | p value | χ2 | Kurtosis/Skewness | Cohen's | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60.07 | 67.14 | p < .001 | 43.305 | -.762/.304 | 1.002 | |
| p < .001 | 5.191 | -.024 | ||||
| Female (%) | 40.70% | 59.30% | ||||
| Male (%) | 59.30% | 40.70% | ||||
| 11.76 | 5.31 | p < .001 | -50.959 | -.383/.021 | -1.167 | |
| p < .001 | 255.597 | .172 | ||||
| Positive financial situation (%) | 61.1% | 41.70% | ||||
| Negative financial situation (%) | 38.90% | 58.30% | ||||
| p < .001 | 142.195 | -.130 | ||||
| Exhibit depressive symptoms (%) | 24.60% | 39.60% | ||||
| Don’t exhibit depressive symptoms (%) | 75.40% | 60.40% | ||||
| p < .001 | 212.682 | -.157 | ||||
| 1+ ADL limitations (%) | 8.30% | 17.40% | ||||
| Without limitations (%) | 91.7% | 82.60% | ||||
| p < .001 | 437.028 | -.225 | ||||
| 1+ mobility limitations (%) | 43% | 55% | ||||
| No limitations (%) | 57% | 45% | ||||
Source: SHARE wave 4, version 1.1.1 weighted data. N (non-weighted): Users = 2656; Non-users = 5983
Determinants of Internet use, according to the characteristics of individuals aged 50+ years, living in Portugal and Estonia.
| Variables | B | OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Age | -.109 | .897 (.890 -.904) |
| Gender (Female) | -.058 | .943 (.836–1.065) |
| Years of schooling | .314 | 1.369 (1.343–1.396) |
| Perception of financial situation (positive perception) | .660 | 1.934 (1.711–2.185) |
| Euro-D (≤ 3 symptoms of depression) | -.157 | .855 (.750-.973) |
| ADL (1+ limitation) | -.234 | .791 (.647-.967) |
| Mobility (1+mobility limitations) | -.161 | .852 (.747-.971) |
| Portugal | .575 | 1.777 (1.490–2.119) |
| Constant | 2.439 | |
| Nagelkerke R Square = .462 p < .001 |
*p < .05;
**p < .01;
***p < .001
Source: SHARE wave 4, non-weighted data. N (non-weighted) = 8283