Literature DB >> 28910122

Race and recession: Effects of economic scarcity on racial discrimination.

Amy R Krosch1, Tom R Tyler2, David M Amodio3.   

Abstract

When the economy declines, existing racial disparities typically expand, suggesting that economic scarcity may promote racial discrimination. To understand this pattern, we examined the effect of perceived scarcity on resource allocations to Black and White American recipients, and tested whether this effect depends on a decision maker's motivation to respond without prejudice. We proposed that scarcity would lead to increased discrimination among those with relatively low internal motivation but not those high in internal motivation. Indeed, we found that when resources were framed as scarce (vs. abundant or a control condition), low-motivation participants allocated less to Black than White recipients, whereas high-motivation participants allocated more to Black than White recipients (Studies 1 and 2). This pattern was strongest when decisions could be made deliberatively (Study 3), and anti-Black allocation bias emerged even in a non-zero-sum context (Studies 4 and 5), suggesting a strategic bias directed against Black recipients rather than in favor of White recipients. These findings indicate that the psychological perception of scarcity can produce racial bias in the distribution of economic resources, depending on the motivations of the decision maker-an effect that may contribute to the increase in racial disparities observed during economic stress. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28910122     DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  8 in total

1.  Punishing the privileged: Selfish offers from high-status allocators elicit greater punishment from third-party arbitrators.

Authors:  Bradley D Mattan; Denise M Barth; Alexandra Thompson; Oriel FeldmanHall; Jasmin Cloutier; Jennifer T Kubota
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Studying a heterogeneous array of target groups can help us understand prejudice.

Authors:  Mark J Brandt; Jarret T Crawford
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-04-02

3.  The influence of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism on environmentalism: A five-year cross-lagged analysis.

Authors:  Samantha K Stanley; Taciano L Milfont; Marc S Wilson; Chris G Sibley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A social virus: Intergroup dehumanization and unwillingness to aid amidst COVID-19 - Who are the main targets?

Authors:  Eli Adler; Shira Hebel-Sela; Oded Adomi Leshem; Jonathan Levy; Eran Halperin
Journal:  Int J Intercult Relat       Date:  2021-11-30

5.  Environmental stress increases out-group aggression and intergroup conflict in humans.

Authors:  Carsten K W De Dreu; Jörg Gross; Lennart Reddmann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Aggressive measures, rising inequalities, and mass formation during the COVID-19 crisis: An overview and proposed way forward.

Authors:  Michaéla C Schippers; John P A Ioannidis; Ari R Joffe
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-25

7.  An Observational Approach to Examining White Parents' Racial Socialization Practices With Adolescent Youth.

Authors:  Chardée A Galán; Shannon Savell; Melvin Wilson; Daniel S Shaw
Journal:  J Res Adolesc       Date:  2022-05-26

8.  COVID-19-Related Assault on Asians: Economic Hardship in the United States and India Predicts Diminished Support for Victim Compensation and Assailant Punishment.

Authors:  James Johnson; David N Sattler; Kylie Otton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.