R Majeed-Ariss1, M McPhee2, C Bundy3, C E M Griffiths1, H Young1. 1. Department of Dermatology, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K. 2. Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, King's Meadow Campus, Nottingham, U.K. 3. School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, U.K.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Psoriasis affects over two million people in the U.K. It has a significant psychological and social impact on individuals and an associated high economic cost to the U.K. National Health Service. There are many unanswered questions about psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To develop a protocol in order to work with patients, families, carers and healthcare professionals to identify psoriasis uncertainties; to agree by consensus a top-10 list of psoriasis uncertainties; and to disseminate prioritized unanswered questions to researchers and funders so as to promote work that will focus on answering the uncertainties considered most important by stakeholders. METHODS: A Psoriasis Priority Setting Partnership has been established to gather psoriasis uncertainties following the transparent methodology advocated by the James Lind Alliance. A steering group composed of stakeholders has disseminated an initial survey to patients, families, carers and healthcare professionals to collect information on important psoriasis questions. After removing duplications, uncertainties will be collated and checked against existing evidence to determine whether any have already been resolved. 'True uncertainties' will be circulated to stakeholders in a second survey where they will be ranked by importance. At a final workshop, information will be distilled to generate a top-10 list of uncertainties. RESULTS: By following the protocol outlined in this paper a prioritized list of uncertainties will be identified that will be used to inform the psoriasis research agenda. CONCLUSIONS: Research targeted to address priorities identified by a range of stakeholders is imperative. This project will inform policy makers and research funding bodies about what really matters to these groups.
BACKGROUND:Psoriasis affects over two million people in the U.K. It has a significant psychological and social impact on individuals and an associated high economic cost to the U.K. National Health Service. There are many unanswered questions about psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To develop a protocol in order to work with patients, families, carers and healthcare professionals to identify psoriasis uncertainties; to agree by consensus a top-10 list of psoriasis uncertainties; and to disseminate prioritized unanswered questions to researchers and funders so as to promote work that will focus on answering the uncertainties considered most important by stakeholders. METHODS: A Psoriasis Priority Setting Partnership has been established to gather psoriasis uncertainties following the transparent methodology advocated by the James Lind Alliance. A steering group composed of stakeholders has disseminated an initial survey to patients, families, carers and healthcare professionals to collect information on important psoriasis questions. After removing duplications, uncertainties will be collated and checked against existing evidence to determine whether any have already been resolved. 'True uncertainties' will be circulated to stakeholders in a second survey where they will be ranked by importance. At a final workshop, information will be distilled to generate a top-10 list of uncertainties. RESULTS: By following the protocol outlined in this paper a prioritized list of uncertainties will be identified that will be used to inform the psoriasis research agenda. CONCLUSIONS: Research targeted to address priorities identified by a range of stakeholders is imperative. This project will inform policy makers and research funding bodies about what really matters to these groups.
Authors: Amena El-Harakeh; Tamara Lotfi; Ali Ahmad; Rami Z Morsi; Racha Fadlallah; Lama Bou-Karroum; Elie A Akl Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-20 Impact factor: 3.240