M A Blankestijn1, H G Otten2, W Suer3, A Weimann3, E F Knol1,2, A C Knulst1. 1. Department of Dermatology/Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 2. Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 3. EUROIMMUN, Lübeck, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known on the clinical relevance of peanut 2S albumin Ara h 7. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the discriminative ability of Ara h 7 in peanut allergy and assess the role of cross-reactivity between Ara h 2, 6 and Ara h 7 isoforms. METHODS: Sensitization to recombinant peanut storage proteins Ara h 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7 was assessed using a line blot in sera from 40 peanut-tolerant and 40 peanut-allergic patients, based on food challenge outcome. A dose-dependent ELISA inhibition experiment was performed with recombinant Ara h 2, 6 and Ara h 7 isoforms. RESULTS: For Ara h 7.0201, an area under the ROC curve was found of 0.83, comparable to Ara h 2 (AUC 0.81) and Ara h 6 (AUC 0.85). Ara h 7 intensity values strongly correlated with those from Ara h 2 and 6 (rs = 0.81). Of all patients sensitized to 2S albumins Ara h 2, 6, or 7, the majority was co-sensitized to all three (n = 24, 68%), although mono-sensitization to either 2S albumin was also observed in selected patients (Ara h 2: n = 6, 17%; Ara h 6: n = 2, 6%; Ara h 7: n = 2, 6%). Binding to Ara h 7.0101 could be strongly inhibited by Ara h 7.0201, but not the other way around. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Specific IgE against Ara h 7.0201 has a predictive ability for peanut allergy similar to Ara h 2 and 6 and possesses unique IgE epitopes as well as epitopes shared between the other Ara h 7 isoform and Ara h 2 and 6. While co-sensitization to all three 2S albumins is most common, mono-sensitization to either Ara h 2, 6, or 7 occurs in selected patients, leading to a risk of misdiagnosis when testing for a single 2S albumin.
BACKGROUND: Little is known on the clinical relevance of peanut2S albumin Ara h 7. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the discriminative ability of Ara h 7 in peanutallergy and assess the role of cross-reactivity between Ara h 2, 6 and Ara h 7 isoforms. METHODS: Sensitization to recombinant peanut storage proteins Ara h 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7 was assessed using a line blot in sera from 40 peanut-tolerant and 40 peanut-allergicpatients, based on food challenge outcome. A dose-dependent ELISA inhibition experiment was performed with recombinant Ara h 2, 6 and Ara h 7 isoforms. RESULTS: For Ara h 7.0201, an area under the ROC curve was found of 0.83, comparable to Ara h 2 (AUC 0.81) and Ara h 6 (AUC 0.85). Ara h 7 intensity values strongly correlated with those from Ara h 2 and 6 (rs = 0.81). Of all patients sensitized to 2S albumins Ara h 2, 6, or 7, the majority was co-sensitized to all three (n = 24, 68%), although mono-sensitization to either 2S albumin was also observed in selected patients (Ara h 2: n = 6, 17%; Ara h 6: n = 2, 6%; Ara h 7: n = 2, 6%). Binding to Ara h 7.0101 could be strongly inhibited by Ara h 7.0201, but not the other way around. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Specific IgE against Ara h 7.0201 has a predictive ability for peanutallergy similar to Ara h 2 and 6 and possesses unique IgE epitopes as well as epitopes shared between the other Ara h 7 isoform and Ara h 2 and 6. While co-sensitization to all three 2S albumins is most common, mono-sensitization to either Ara h 2, 6, or 7 occurs in selected patients, leading to a risk of misdiagnosis when testing for a single 2S albumin.
Authors: Genghao Chen; Ellen L Shrock; Mamie Z Li; Jonathan M Spergel; Kari C Nadeau; Jacqueline A Pongracic; Dale T Umetsu; Rima Rachid; Andrew J MacGinnitie; Wanda Phipatanakul; Lynda Schneider; Hans C Oettgen; Stephen J Elledge Journal: Cell Rep Med Date: 2021-10-19
Authors: Mareen R Datema; Sarah A Lyons; Montserrat Fernández-Rivas; Barbara Ballmer-Weber; André C Knulst; Riccardo Asero; Laura Barreales; Simona Belohlavkova; Frédéric de Blay; Michael Clausen; Ruta Dubakiene; Cristina Fernández-Perez; Philipp Fritsche; David Gislason; Karin Hoffmann-Sommergruber; Monika Jedrzejczak-Czechowicz; Laurian Jongejan; Marek L Kowalski; Tanya Z Kralimarkova; Jonas Lidholm; Nikolaos G Papadopoulos; Todor A Popov; Nayade Del Prado; Ashok Purohit; Isabel Reig; Suranjith L Seneviratne; Athanassios Sinaniotis; Emilia Vassilopoulou; Serge A Versteeg; Stefan Vieths; Paco M J Welsing; E N Clare Mills; Thuy-My Le; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Ronald van Ree Journal: Front Allergy Date: 2021-06-07
Authors: Khidir W Hilu; Sheena A Friend; Viruthika Vallanadu; Anne M Brown; Louis R Hollingsworth; David R Bevan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anna M Ehlers; Marco Klinge; Waltraud Suer; Yvonne Weimann; André C Knulst; Frithjof Besa; Thuy-My Le; Henny G Otten Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2019-10-06 Impact factor: 5.018
Authors: Hannah M Kansen; Francine C van Erp; Yolanda Meijer; Dianne M W Gorissen; Marike Stadermann; Maartje F van Velzen; Willem R Keusters; Geert W J Frederix; André C Knulst; Cornelis K van der; Thuy-My Le Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 5.018