Literature DB >> 28905357

Interval between IVF stimulation cycle and frozen embryo transfer: Is there a benefit to a delay between cycles?

Chloe Higgins1, Martin Healey2,3,4, Sameer Jatkar4,5, Beverley Vollenhoven1,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is currently limited evidence available regarding ideal timing for frozen embryo transfer (FET). Demonstrating that delaying FETs has few clinical benefits would allow patients to proceed with FET at their earliest convenience. AIMS: To examine whether the time interval between stimulation cycle and subsequent FET affects pregnancy and live birth rates.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study, based in a multi-site private in vitro fertilisation (IVF) clinic categorised women into two groups: those having FET cycles administered within 25-35 days or 50-70 days of IVF stimulation cycle and embryo freeze. Outcomes measured were clinical pregnancy and live birth rates.
RESULTS: When comparing the patients who have had a 25-35 days gap between embryo freeze and FET, to the matched patients who had a 50-70 days gap, the statistically significant results showed an adjusted odds ratio for live birth of 1.31 (1.02-1.67). The adjusted odds ratio for clinical pregnancy in matched case : control analysis was not statistically significant at 1.22 (0.97-1.53).
CONCLUSION: A gap of 25-35 days between embryo freeze and FET was associated with improved live birth rates compared to a gap of 50-70 days.
© 2017 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical pregnancy; embryo cryopreservation; frozen embryo transfer; live birth; time to pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28905357     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  12 in total

1.  Delayed versus immediate frozen embryo transfer after oocyte retrieval: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jialyu Huang; Jiaying Lin; Xuefeng Lu; Renfei Cai; Ning Song; Yanping Kuang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  To delay or not frozen embryo transfer in freeze-all cycles?

Authors:  Panagiotis Drakopoulos; Samuel Santos-Ribeiro; Shari Mackens; Anna Lisa Racca; Christophe Blockeel; Herman Tournaye; Antonis Makrigiannakis
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-07

Review 3.  When Should We Freeze Embryos? Current Data for Fresh and Frozen Embryo Replacement IVF Cycles.

Authors:  Michail Kalinderis; Kallirhoe Kalinderi; Garima Srivastava; Roy Homburg
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  When is the optimal timing of frozen embryo transfer after controlled ovarian stimulation?

Authors:  Hyun Joo Lee; Jong Kil Joo
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-04

5.  Whether immediate frozen-thawed embryo transfer improves IVF outcome in non-elective freeze all policy.

Authors:  Loris Marin; Amerigo Vitagliano
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-08

6.  Frozen embryo transfer at the cleavage stage can be performed within the first menstrual cycle following the freeze-all strategy without adversely affecting the live birth rate: A STROBE-compliant retrospective study.

Authors:  Jingyan Song; Shan Xiang; Zhengao Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  The impact of adenomyosis on IVF outcomes: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chloe Higgins; Hugo Fernandes; Fabricio Da Silva Costa; Wellington P Martins; Beverley Vollenhoven; Martin Healey
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-04-19

8.  Timing of frozen-thawed embryo transfer after controlled ovarian stimulation in a non-elective freeze-all policy.

Authors:  Jialyu Huang; Xuefeng Lu; Qin Xie; Jiaying Lin; Renfei Cai; Yanping Kuang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

9.  Effects of immediate versus delayed frozen embryo transfer in high responder patients undergoing freeze-all cycles.

Authors:  Na Zuo; Yingzhuo Gao; Ningning Zhang; Da Li; Xiuxia Wang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  The Future of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies.

Authors:  Ernesto Bosch; Michel De Vos; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.