| Literature DB >> 28905318 |
Xiaoliang Jiang1, Yujing Wu1, Guihua Liu1, Wenzhi Liu2, Bei Lu1,3.
Abstract
Ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) and bacteria (AOB) play important roles in regulating the nitrification process in lake ecosystems. However, the relative effects of climate, catchment land use and local conditions on the sediment ammonia-oxidizing communities in lakes remain unclear. In this study, the diversity and abundance of AOA and AOB communities were investigated in ten Yangtze lakes by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), clone library and quantitative PCR techniques. The results showed that the abundances of both AOA and AOB in bare sediments were considerably but not significantly higher than those in vegetated sediments. Interestingly, AOB communities were more sensitive to changes in local environmental factors and vegetation characteristics than were AOA communities. Amongst climate and land use variables, mean annual precipitation, percentage of agriculture and percentage of vegetation were the key determinants of AOB abundance and diversity. Additionally, total organic carbon and chlorophyll-a concentrations in lake water were significantly related to AOB abundance and diversity. The results of the ordination analysis indicated that 81.2 and 84.3% of the cumulative variance for the species composition of AOA and AOB communities could be explained by the climate, land use and local factors. The climate and local environments played important roles in shaping AOA communities, whereas catchment agriculture and water chlorophyll-a concentration were key influencing factors of AOB communities. Our findings suggest that the composition and structure of sediment ammonia-oxidizing communities in Yangtze lakes are strongly influenced by different spatial scale factors.Entities:
Keywords: AOA; AOB; Land use; Nitrification; Submerged vegetation
Year: 2017 PMID: 28905318 PMCID: PMC5597559 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-017-0479-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Fig. 1Location of ten study lakes in the Yangtze River basin
The geographic location, morphology, climate, and catchment land uses of ten study lakes in the Yangtze River basin, China
| Lake names | Longitude | Latitude | Elevation | Lake area | Mean depth | MAT | MAP | Catchment agriculture | Catchment built-up land | Catchment vegetation | Catchment water bodies |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (°E) | (°N) | (m) | (km2) | (m) | (°C) | (mm) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | |
| 1. Lake Bajiaohu | 113.20 | 29.45 | 27 | 12.3 | 3.0 | 16.50 | 1360 | 40.12 | 8.11 | 28.33 | 23.44 |
| 2. Lake Chihu | 115.73 | 29.77 | 16 | 80.4 | 2.8 | 16.57 | 1583 | 46.27 | 2.36 | 34.56 | 16.81 |
| 3. Lake Dianshanhu | 120.96 | 31.10 | 3 | 63.7 | 2.5 | 16.19 | 1311 | 54.11 | 2.75 | 33.19 | 9.95 |
| 4. Lake Donghu | 112.65 | 29.38 | 25 | 23.2 | 3.5 | 15.26 | 1195 | 48.99 | 17.34 | 17.07 | 16.60 |
| 5. Lake Guchenghu | 118.91 | 31.30 | 8 | 24.5 | 1.6 | 14.98 | 1292 | 44.13 | 3.25 | 41.13 | 11.49 |
| 6. Lake Honghu | 113.36 | 29.84 | 25 | 344.4 | 1.9 | 16.24 | 1359 | 54.87 | 1.13 | 17.35 | 26.65 |
| 7. Lake Huahu | 115.05 | 30.30 | 18 | 10.3 | 1.8 | 16.41 | 1532 | 43.22 | 6.67 | 33.21 | 16.90 |
| 8. Lake Junshanhu | 116.36 | 28.51 | 18 | 192.5 | 4.0 | 17.15 | 1724 | 38.92 | 2.93 | 35.67 | 22.48 |
| 9. Lake Taihu | 120.34 | 31.20 | 3 | 2425 | 2.1 | 15.26 | 1175 | 42.33 | 13.05 | 33.05 | 11.57 |
| 10. Lake Xilianghu | 114.10 | 29.97 | 22 | 72.1 | 1.9 | 16.31 | 1451 | 37.33 | 2.43 | 37.17 | 23.07 |
MAT and MAP indicate mean annual temperature and mean annual precipitation, respectively
Diversity and abundance of nitrifying archaea and bacteria in sediments from vegetated and bare sites
| Vegetated sites (N = 20) | Bare sites (N = 15) | All sites (N = 35) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chao1 diversity | |||
| AOA | 10.47 ± 8.92b | 8.77 ± 7.36b | 9.65 ± 8.12b |
| AOB | 19.89 ± 12.18a | 19.76 ± 16.22a | 19.84 ± 13.83a |
| Shannon diversity | |||
| AOA | 1.31 ± 0.73 | 1.08 ± 0.49 | 1.20 ± 0.63 |
| AOB | 1.42 ± 0.66 | 1.51 ± 0.75 | 1.46 ± 0.69 |
| Simpson diversity | |||
| AOA | 0.40 ± 0.27 | 0.47 ± 0.23 | 0.44 ± 0.25 |
| AOB | 0.41 ± 0.22 | 0.38 ± 0.26 | 0.40 ± 0.23 |
| Abundance (104 copies g−1) | |||
| AOA | 1.60 ± 1.36b | 29.19 ± 86.27b | 13.43 ± 57.07b |
| AOB | 0.84 ± 0.70a | 2.06 ± 2.83a | 1.36 ± 19.99a |
| Abundance ratio | |||
| AOA/AOB | 2.79 ± 3.68 | 5.14 ± 8.32 | 3.79 ± 6.12 |
There was no significant difference in diversity and abundance of AOA and AOB between vegetated and bare sites. Mean ± standard deviation followed by different letters in the same column indicate significant difference (P < 0.05) between AOA and AOB
Correlation between AOA and AOB community structure with climate, land use and local factors
| Chao1 diversity | Shannon diversity | Simpson diversity | Abundance | Abundance ratio | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AOA | AOB | AOA | AOB | AOA | AOB | AOA | AOB | AOA/AOB | |
| MAT | −0.02 | −0.27 | −0.05 | −0.15 | 0.02 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.10 |
| MAP | 0.07 | −0.37* | 0.09 | −0.40* | −0.11 | 0.42* | −0.05 | −0.08 | −0.09 |
| Agriculture | −0.23 | 0.39* | −0.35 | 0.44** | 0.38* | −0.49** | −0.18 | 0.31 | −0.33 |
| Built-up land | 0.01 | 0.02 | −0.02 | 0.03 | 0.01 | −0.01 | 0.10 | −0.25 | 0.24 |
| Vegetation | 0.22 | −0.33* | 0.36* | −0.37* | −0.36* | 0.34* | −0.08 | −0.21 | −0.01 |
| Water bodies | −0.06 | 0.04 | −0.10 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.14 |
| pH | 0.28 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.21 | −0.16 | −0.19 | 0.18 | 0.34* | 0.20 |
| Depth | 0.14 | −0.08 | 0.26 | −0.12 | −0.28 | 0.13 | −0.04 | 0.09 | −0.13 |
| DO | 0.28 | 0.03 | 0.24 | 0.23 | −0.28 | −0.21 | 0.04 | 0.26 | −0.03 |
| TOC | −0.34 | 0.46** | −0.29 | 0.46** | 0.28 | −0.49** | 0.14 | 0.37* | −0.04 |
| NH4 + | −0.16 | −0.35 | −0.16 | −0.23 | 0.10 | 0.17 | −0.21 | −0.10 | −0.17 |
| NO3 − | −0.07 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.06 | −0.21 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 0.12 | 0.39* |
| TP | −0.31 | −0.01 | −0.27 | 0.11 | 0.24 | −0.20 | 0.07 | 0.25 | 0.00 |
| Chl- | −0.08 | 0.28 | −0.02 | 0.39* | 0.03 | −0.37* | 0.43* | 0.65** | 0.35* |
| Moisture | 0.03 | −0.11 | 0.22 | −0.18 | −0.26 | 0.16 | −0.19 | −0.26 | −0.11 |
| Density | −0.05 | −0.09 | −0.07 | −0.02 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.09 |
| STC | −0.29 | 0.10 | −0.29 | 0.05 | 0.28 | −0.08 | −0.01 | 0.22 | −0.11 |
| STN | −0.12 | 0.00 | −0.14 | −0.09 | 0.12 | 0.10 | −0.07 | −0.01 | −0.11 |
| C/N | −0.40* | 0.07 | −0.35 | 0.08 | 0.33 | −0.13 | 0.01 | 0.32 | −0.11 |
| Richness | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.14 | −0.03 | −0.13 | 0.01 | −0.21 | −0.22 | −0.12 |
| Biomass | 0.09 | 0.19 | −0.02 | 0.14 | 0.06 | −0.11 | −0.17 | −0.11 | −0.13 |
| PTN | −0.14 | 0.56* | −0.07 | 0.46* | 0.10 | −0.49* | −0.15 | 0.52* | −0.30 |
| PTP | 0.18 | −0.22 | 0.35 | −0.11 | −0.41 | 0.05 | 0.16 | −0.25 | 0.43 |
** P < 0.01; * P < 0.05
Fig. 2Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of archaeal amoA
Fig. 3Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of bacterial amoA
Fig. 4RDA or CCA ordination plots for the first two principal dimensions of the relationship between the AOB (a) and AOA (b) community compositions with the environmental parameters
Contributions of different factors to the variation in the community structure of AOA and AOB as revealed by canonical correspondence analysis or redundancy analyses
| Variables | AOA | AOB | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variance explained (%) | P value | Variance explained (%) | P value | |
| Climate | ||||
| MAT (°C) |
|
| 2.00 | 0.30 |
| MAP (mm) |
|
| 1.00 | 0.36 |
| Catchment land use | ||||
| Agriculture (%) | 2.00 | 0.50 |
|
|
| Built-up land (%) |
|
| 2.00 | 0.23 |
| Vegetation (%) | 3.68 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Water bodies (%) | 0.00 | 0.55 | 3.00 | 0.09 |
| Water quality | ||||
| pH | 3.38 | 0.13 | 1.00 | 0.54 |
| Depth (m) | 3.38 | 0.13 | 2.00 | 0.11 |
| DO (mg L‒1) | 3.53 | 0.13 | 3.00 | 0.11 |
| TOC (mg L‒1) | 2.15 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.36 |
| NH4 + (mg L‒1) |
|
| 1.00 | 0.31 |
| NO3 − (mg L‒1) | 4.14 | 0.06 | 3.00 | 0.06 |
| TP (mg L‒1) | 3.22 | 0.24 |
|
|
| Chl- | 3.07 | 0.20 |
|
|
| Sediment properties | ||||
| Moisture (%) | 3.07 | 0.16 | 2.00 | 0.37 |
| Density (g cm−3) | 1.84 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.19 |
| STC (mg g−1) | 2.92 | 0.24 | 1.00 | 0.38 |
| STN (mg g−1) | 2.30 | 0.38 | 2.00 | 0.15 |
| C/N |
|
| 0.00 | 0.58 |
| Vegetation characteristics | ||||
| Richness | 2.46 | 0.40 | 1.00 | 0.44 |
| Biomass (g m‒2) | 1.23 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.35 |
| PTN (mg g−1) |
|
| 1.00 | 0.41 |
| PTP (mg g−1) | 2.76 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| All variables | 81.21 | 84.30 | ||
Significance was determined by 499 permutations