| Literature DB >> 28904983 |
Prejaas Tewarie1,2, Lisanne J Balk1, Arjan Hillebrand3, Martijn D Steenwijk1,4, Bernard M J Uitdehaag1, Cornelis J Stam3, Axel Petzold1,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We conducted a multi-modal optical coherence tomography (OCT) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) study to test whether there is a relationship between retinal layer integrity and electrophysiological activity and connectivity (FC) in the visual network influenced by optic neuritis (ON) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).Entities:
Keywords: Functional connectivity; magnetoencephalography; multiple sclerosis; neuronal oscillations; optical coherence tomography; visual cortex
Year: 2017 PMID: 28904983 PMCID: PMC5590521 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.415
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol ISSN: 2328-9503 Impact factor: 4.511
Figure 1The structural‐functional relationship between the retina and the functional network in the visual cortex. (A) shows the OCT scan location at the optic disc and the macula. The colored lines in (A) are the result of the automated retinal layer segmentation. (B) shows the optic radiation and a lesion in these tracts that could lead to retrograde axonal degeneration. (C) illustrates the MEG visual resting‐state network as projected on a template mesh of the cortical surface viewed from the top (left) and from the back (right). Red dots correspond to visual regions, and blue lines to connections between these visual regions. The light blue arrows indicate how damage in one structure may influence other structures in the visual pathway. Abbreviations: superior occipital gyrus (SOG), medial occipital gyrus (MOG), inferior occipital gyrus (IOG), cuneus (CUN), lingual gyrus (LING).
Baseline characteristics of patients with multiple sclerosis
| MS patients (pooled) | MSNON (bilateral) | MSON (unilateral) | MSON (bilateral) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 102 (100%) | 48 (47.1%) | 38 (37.3%) | 16 (15.7%) |
| Age (years) | 54.3 (±10.0) | 54.9 (±10.9) | 52.8 (±8.8) | 55.9 (±8.5) |
| Gender (% female) | 66 (64.7%) | 27 (56.3%) | 29 (76.3%) | 10 (62.5%) |
| MS type (N [%]) | ||||
| RR | 68 (66.7%) | 30 (62.4%) | 26 (68.4%) | 12 (75.0%) |
| SP | 24 (23.5%) | 9 (18.8%) | 12 (31.6%) | 3 (18.8%) |
| PP | 10 (9.8%) | 9 (18.8%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (6.2%) |
| Disease duration (years) | 18.2 (±6.7) | 16.7 (±6.5) | 18.2 (±5.8) | 22.8 (±7.6) |
| EDSS (median [range]) | 4.1 [1.0–8.0] | 4.1 [1.0–7.5] | 4.1 [2.5–8.0] | 4.0 [2.0–6.0] |
| Visual acuity | 0.8 (±0.2) | 0.8 (±0.2) | 0.8 (±0.2) | 0.8 (±0.2) |
Data are shown for the entire cohort and for those MS patients who never experienced an episode of MS–associated optic neuritis (MSNON), and those with bilateral or unilateral MSON. Numbers (%), mean (±SD) or median [range] are shown. RR, relapsing remitting MS; SP, secondary progressive MS; PP, primary progressive MS.
Patients with bilateral MSON had a significant longer disease duration compared to patients with unilateral MSON (P = 0.02) and MSNON patients (P = 0.0015).
Functional–structural relationships between MEG frequency band activities and OCT retinal layer thicknesses
| Patient group | OCT location | MEG relative power (frequency band) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Peak latency | ||
| MS (pooled) | Disc | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Macula | – | – | ORL(+)* | – |
| – | – | |
| MSNON (bilateral) | Disc | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Macula | – | – | ORL(+)* | ORL(–)* | – | – | – | |
| MSON (unilateral) | Disc | INL(–)* | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Macula | IRL(–)* | – | – |
| – | – | INL(–)* | |
| MSON (bilateral) | Disc | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Macula | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| |
General estimating equations (GEE) were used for logistic regression prediction of frequency band–specific activity, adjusting for age, VA, gender, and extent of MS lesions in the optic radiations. Significant relationships were indicated as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001, – = no significant relationship. The signs (+/−) behind the significant relationships denote whether the association was positive (i.e., denoting a significantly thicker retinal layer in patients with higher visual cortex activity) or negative (–). Inner nuclear layer (INL), outer retinal layer (ORL), inner retinal layer (IRL). Significant findings which remain after Bonferroni correction (P < 0.007) are shown in bold.
Functional–structural relationships between MEG functional connectivity in different frequency bands and OCT retinal layer thicknesses of the optic disc or macula
| Patient group | OCT location | MEG functional connectivity (frequency band) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| MS (pooled) | Disc | IRL(+)*, INL(+)*, ORL(+)* | – | – | – | INL(+)* | – |
| Macula | – | – | – | – | – | IRL(+)* | |
| MSNON (bilateral) | Disc | IRL(+)*, INL(+) *, ORL(+)* | – | – | – | – | – |
| Macula | – | INL(–)* | – | – | – | IRL(+)* | |
| MSON (unilateral) | Disc | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Macula | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| MSON (bilateral) | Disc | INL(–)*, ORL(+)* |
| ORL(–)** | – | – | – |
| Macula | – | – | ORL(+)* |
| – | ||
General estimating equations (GEE) were used for logistic regression of predicting high connectivity, adjusting for age, VA, gender, and extent of MS lesions in the optic radiations.
Significant relationships were indicated as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001, – = not significant. The signs (+/−) behind the significant relationships denote whether the association was positive (+ and denoting a significantly thicker or thinner retinal layer in patients with higher functional connectivity in the visual cortex, respectively). Inner nuclear layer (INL), outer retinal layer (ORL), inner retinal layer (IRL). Significant findings which remain after Bonferroni correction (P < 0.008) are shown in bold.