Literature DB >> 28904742

Draft genome sequence of the cellulolytic endophyte Chitinophaga costaii A37T2T.

Diogo N Proença1, William B Whitman2, Nicole Shapiro3, Tanja Woyke3, Nikos C Kyrpides3, Paula V Morais1,4.   

Abstract

Here we report the draft genome sequence of Chitinophaga costai A37T2T (=CIP 110584T, =LMG 27458T), which was isolated from the endophytic community of Pinus pinaster tree. The total genome size of C. costaii A37T2T is 5.07 Mbp, containing 4204 coding sequences. Strain A37T2T encoded multiple genes likely involved in cellulolytic, chitinolytic and lipolytic activities. This genome showed 1145 unique genes assigned into 109 Cluster of Orthologous Groups in comparison with the complete genome of C. pinensis DSM 2588T. The genomic information suggests the potential of the strain A37T2T to interact with the plant metabolism. As there are only a few bacterial genomes related to Pine Wilt Disease, this work provides a contribution to the field.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cellulase; Chitinase; Chitinophaga costaii A37T2; Genome sequence

Year:  2017        PMID: 28904742      PMCID: PMC5585966          DOI: 10.1186/s40793-017-0262-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

The genus 10.1601/nm.8334 belongs to the family Chtiniphagaceae (phylum 10.1601/nm.7927) alongside with the genera 10.1601/nm.26356, 10.1601/nm.24507, 10.1601/nm.10262, 10.1601/nm.25037, 10.1601/nm.25347, 10.1601/nm.14773, 10.1601/nm.14303, 10.1601/nm.26907, 10.1601/nm.19904, 10.1601/nm.11311, 10.1601/nm.22146, 10.1601/nm.14308, 10.1601/nm.24623, 10.1601/nm.21260, 10.1601/nm.14305, 10.1601/nm.10412, 10.1601/nm.10256, 10.1601/nm.28007, 10.1601/nm.14937, 10.1601/nm.13147, 10.1601/nm.11309, 10.1601/nm.24621, 10.1601/nm.10067, 10.1601/nm.25337 and Vibriomonas. The genus 10.1601/nm.8334 is widely distributed in the environment and strains of this genus have been isolated from pine trees, soil, rhizosphere soil, roots, vermicompost and weathered rock [1]. Twenty-four species belonging to the genus 10.1601/nm.8334 have been described [2], and only the type species of the genus 10.1601/nm.8335 has the complete genome sequenced [3]. trees from Central Portugal present a diverse endophytic microbial community. Strain A37T2T was isolated as part of the endophytic microbiome of pine trees affected by Pine Wilt Disease (PWD) which is a world devastating disease, consequence of colonization in pine trees [4]. Here, we show the second genome of the genus 10.1601/nm.8334, a draft genome of 10.1601/nm.25336 A37T2T, previously isolated as endophyte of affected by PWD [1].

Organism information

Classification and features

The type strain A37T2T (=10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DCIP+110584 T =10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DLMG+27458 T), was isolated from tree trunk of a tree affected by PWD and it described as 10.1601/nm.25336 (family 10.1601/nm.14400, phylum 10.1601/nm.7927) [1]. It was Gram-stain-negative, facultative anaerobic, non-motile, formed rod-shaped cells, 0-5-1 μm in diameter and 1-8 μm in length after 48 h on R2A agar media (Fig. 1). Showed capacity to grow on R2A agar medium at 15-45 °C (optimum, 26-30 °C), at pH 5.5-8.0 (optimum, pH 7) and supplemented with up to 1% (w/v) NaCl (optimum without NaCl). The major fatty acids (>25%) showed by the strain A37T2T are saturated iso-C15: 0 and unsaturated C16: 1 . The major polar lipids were identified as phosphatidylethanolamine, two unidentified aminophospholipids and one unidentified lipid. No glycolipid was detected. The menaquinone 7 (MK-7) was shown as the major respiratory lipoquinone. The determined DNA G + C content of the 10.1601/nm.25336 A37T2T was 46.6 mol%. Key features of this microorganism are summarized in Table 1. A phylogenetic tree based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence of this strain and its closest relative members are given in Fig. 2. The sequences were aligned by SINA (v1.2.9) using the SILVA SEED as reference alignment [5]. Sequences were included in 16S rRNA-based Living Tree Project (LTP) release 115 database [6] by parsimony implemented in the ARB software package version 5.5 [7]. Evolutionary distances were calculated [8] and phylogenetic dendrograms were constructed using the neighbor-joining [9] and Randomized Axelerated Maximum Likelihood (RAxML) method with GTRGAMMA model [10] included in the ARB software [7]. Trees topologies were evaluated by performing bootstrap analysis [11] of 1000 data sets by using ARB software package.
Fig. 1

Scanning electron micrograph of C. costaii A37T2T after 48 h of growth on R2A agar plates at 30 °C

Table 1

Classification and general features of Chitinophaga costaii A37T2T according to the MIGS recommendations [26]

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence codea
ClassificationDomain Bacteria TAS [27]
Phylum Bacteroidetes TAS [28, 29]
Class Sphingobacteriia TAS [28, 30]
Order Sphingobacteriales TAS [28, 31]
Family Chitinophagaceae TAS [32]
Genus Chitinophaga TAS [33]
Species Chitinophaga costaii TAS [1]
Type strain: A37T2T (=CIP 110584T, =LMG 27458T)
Gram stainNegativeTAS [1]
Cell shapeRodTAS [1]
MotilityNon-motileTAS [1]
SporulationNot reportedNAS
Temperature range15-45 °CTAS [1]
Optimum temperature26-30 °CTAS [1]
pH range; Optimum5.5-8.0; 7TAS [1]
Carbon sourceGlucoseTAS [1]
MIGS-6HabitatEndophyte of Pinus pinaster treeTAS [1]
MIGS-6.3Salinity1.0% NaCl (w/v)TAS [1]
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementFacultative anaerobicTAS [1]
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipFree-livingTAS [1]
MIGS-14PathogenicityNon-pathogenNAS
MIGS-4Geographic locationPortugalTAS [1]
MIGS-5Sample collectionJuly, 2009NAS
MIGS-4.1Latitude40.2962266NAS
MIGS-4.2Longitude−7.9207357NAS
MIGS-4.4Altitude217 mNAS

aEvidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [34]

Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree based on a comparison of the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain A37T2T and the other type strains within the family Chitinophagaceae. The tree was created using the maximum likelihood method (RAxML). The numbers on the tree indicate the percentages of bootstrap sampling, derived from 1000 replications; values below 50% are not shown. Symbol (•) indicates node branches conserved when the tree was reconstructed using the neighbor-joining method. The isolate characterized in this study is indicated in bold. Scale bar, 1 inferred nucleotide substitution per 100 nucleotides

Scanning electron micrograph of C. costaii A37T2T after 48 h of growth on R2A agar plates at 30 °C Classification and general features of Chitinophaga costaii A37T2T according to the MIGS recommendations [26] aEvidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [34] Phylogenetic tree based on a comparison of the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain A37T2T and the other type strains within the family Chitinophagaceae. The tree was created using the maximum likelihood method (RAxML). The numbers on the tree indicate the percentages of bootstrap sampling, derived from 1000 replications; values below 50% are not shown. Symbol (•) indicates node branches conserved when the tree was reconstructed using the neighbor-joining method. The isolate characterized in this study is indicated in bold. Scale bar, 1 inferred nucleotide substitution per 100 nucleotides

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at ENA under the accession numbers FMAR01000001-FMAR01000056 and in the Integrated Microbial Genomes database (IMG) with Biosample ID SAMN05216457 [12]. The genome sequencing of this organism is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea [13], 1000 Microbial Genomes project, phase III (KMG-III) [14], at the U.S. Department of Energy, Joint Genome Institute (JGI). The project information and its association with the MIGS is summarized in Table 2.
Table 2

Project information

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS 31Finishing qualityDraft
MIGS-28Libraries usedIllumina Regular Fragment, 300 bp, Tubes
MIGS 29Sequencing platformsIllumina HiSeq 2500-1 TB
MIGS 31.2Fold coverage297.2
MIGS 30AssemblersSPAdes
MIGS 32Gene calling methodNCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline
Locus TagGA0116948
Genbank IDFMAR00000000
GenBank Date of ReleaseAugust 3, 2016
GOLD IDGp0139259
BIOPROJECTPRJNA322901
MIGS 13Source Material IdentifierA37T2T
Project relevanceGEBA-KMG
Project information

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

The strain A37T2T was grown on R2A agar media at 30 °C during 48 h and its genomic DNA was extracted using the E.Z.N.A. Bacterial DNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The draft genome of 10.1601/nm.25336 A37T2T was generated at the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI) using the Illumina technology [15]. An Illumina 300 bp insert standard shotgun library was constructed and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq–2500 1 TB platform, generating 9,965,394 reads totaling 1494.8 Mbp. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found at [16]. All raw Illumina sequence data was filtered using BBDuk [17], which removes known Illumina artifacts and PhiX. Reads with more than one “N” or with quality scores (before trimming) averaging less than 8 or reads shorter than 51 bp (after trimming) were discarded. Remaining reads were mapped to masked versions of human, cat and dog references using BBMAP [17] and discarded if identity exceeded 95%. Sequence masking was performed with BBMask [17]. Following steps were then performed for assembly: (1) artifact filtered Illumina reads were assembled using SPAdes (version 3.6.2) [18]; (2) assembled contigs were discarded if length was <1 kbp. Parameters for the SPAdes assembly were ––cov–cutoff auto ––phred–offset 33 –t 8 –m 40 ––careful –k 25,55,95 ––12.

Genome annotation

Protein-coding genes were identified using Prodigal [19], as part of the DOE-JGI genome annotation pipeline [20]. Additional gene prediction analysis and manual functional annotation were performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes Expert Review system (IMG-ER), which provides tools for analyzing and reviewing the structural and functional annotations of genomes in a comparative context [12, 21]. Genome annotation procedures are detailed in Markowitz et al. [12] and references therein. Briefly, the predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the NCBI nonredundant database, UNIProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, KEGG, COG and InterPro databases. Transfer RNA genes were identified using the tRNAScan-SE tool and other non-coding RNAs were found using INFERNAL. Ribosomal RNA genes were predicted using hmmsearch against the custom models generated for each type of rRNA.

Genome properties

The draft genome sequence of 10.1601/nm.25336 strain A37T2T comprised 5,074,440 bp, based on 1494.8 Mbp of Illumina data with a mapped coverage of 297.2-fold of the genome. The final draft assembly contained 56 contigs in 56 scaffolds with more than 1052 bp. The G + C content was 47.6%. The genome encoded 4204 putative coding sequences (CDSs) (Table 3). Fifty four % of the CDSs, corresponding to 2284 proteins, could be assigned to Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG) families [22] (Table 4). The draft genome sequence contained four ribosomal RNAs and 50 tRNAs loci (Table 3).
Table 3

General genome features of Chitinophaga costaii A37T2T

AttributeValue% of Total
Genome size (bp)5,074,440100.00
DNA coding (bp)4,431,74387.33
DNA G + C (bp)2,413,59847.56
DNA scaffolds56100.00
Total genes4274100.00
Protein coding genes420498.36
RNA genes701.64
Genes in internal clusters82419.28
Genes with function prediction304171.15
Genes assigned to COGs228453.44
Genes with Pfam domains197661.75
Genes with signal peptides65115.23
Genes with transmembrane helices97222.74
CRISPR repeats30.00
Table 4

Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories

CodeValue%ageDescription
J1867.42Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A00.00RNA processing and modification
K2158.58Transcription
L903.50Replication, recombination and repair
D190.76Cell cycle control, Cell division, chromosome partitioning
V983.91Defense mechanisms
T1144.55Signal transduction mechanisms
M2118.42Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N120.48Cell motility
U200.80Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O1365.42Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C1265.03Energy production and conversion
G1656.58Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E1967.82Amino acid transport and metabolism
F692.75Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H1415.62Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I1254.99Lipid transport and metabolism
P1505.98Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q702.79Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R2489.89General function prediction only
S1044.15Function unknown
-199046.56Not in COGs

The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome

General genome features of Chitinophaga costaii A37T2T Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome The Average Nucleotide Identity between 10.1601/nm.25336 A37T2T and 10.1601/nm.8335 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DDSM+2588 T was 70.9 based on 1593 of total Bidirectional Best Hits, using MiSI [23]. Figure 3 shows the circular graph of the genome of 10.1601/nm.25336 A37T2T query to the only available complete genome of the genus 10.1601/nm.8334, 10.1601/nm.8335 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DDSM+2588 T [2].
Fig. 3

The genome of Chitinophaga costaii A37T2T. From outside to the center: genes of genome of C. pinensis DSM 2588T and its similarity with the genome of C. costaii (50-100%), GC content of C. costaii A37T2T, GC skew of C. costaii A37T2T, genome of C. costaii A37T2T

The genome of Chitinophaga costaii A37T2T. From outside to the center: genes of genome of C. pinensis DSM 2588T and its similarity with the genome of C. costaii (50-100%), GC content of C. costaii A37T2T, GC skew of C. costaii A37T2T, genome of C. costaii A37T2T The comparison between the draft genome of 10.1601/nm.25336 A37T2T and the complete genome of 10.1601/nm.8335 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DDSM+2588 T showed 1145 unique genes only present in the genome of 10.1601/nm.25336 A37T2T and 3493 unique genes only present in the genome of 10.1601/nm.8335 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DDSM+2588 T. Focused on the unique genes present on the genome of strain A37T2T it was possible to assigned 109 COG, summarized in Table 5.
Table 5

Unique Cluster Orthologous Groups present in the genome of C. costaii A37T2T

Catergory CodeCatergoryCOG ID
CEnergy production and conversionCOG0280, COG0374, COG0680, COG1740
EAmino acid transport and metabolismCOG1027, COG1586, COG2355, COG3104
FNucleotide transport and metabolismCOG0027
GCarbohydrate transport and metabolismCOG0021, COG0058, COG0588, COG0662, COG0837, COG1080, COG1803, COG1925, COG2079, COG2893, COG3444, COG3716, COG3934
HCoenzyme transport and metabolismCOG0561, COG1056, COG2091, COG2227, COG2329
ILipid transport and metabolismCOG0671, COG0821, COG2246
JTranslation, ribosomal structure and biogenesisCOG0060, COG0255, COG0257, COG0267, COG0268, COG0333, COG4680
KTranscriptionCOG1476, COG4933
LReplication, recombination and repairCOG0863, COG1722
MCell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesisCOG1083, COG1922, COG2089, COG2829, COG2982, COG3511, COG3637
OPosttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperonesCOG0068, COG0298, COG0309, COG0409
PInorganic ion transport and metabolismCOG0428, COG1218, COG1230, COG1416, COG4772
QSecondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolismCOG2130, COG2162, COG3733, COG4242
RGeneral function prediction onlyCOG0312, COG0375, COG0429, COG0457, COG1062, COG1373, COG2320, COG3153, COG3488, COG4674, COG0561, COG2130, COG4242
SFunction unknownCOG0393, COG1286, COG2442, COG2962, COG3219, COG3247, COG3310, COG3361, COG3461, COG3477, COG3487, COG3489, COG3528, COG3548, COG3918, COG3943, COG4487, COG4700, COG4859, COG4924
TSignal transduction mechanismsCOG0517, COG2184, COG2203, COG3292, COG1925
UIntracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transportCOG1272, COG1826, COG3451
VDefense mechanismsCOG0286, COG0610, COG0732, COG3512, COG3513, COG4823, COG5499
XMobilome: prophages, transposonsCOG3385, COG3436, COG3600, COG3654
Unique Cluster Orthologous Groups present in the genome of C. costaii A37T2T

Insights from the genome sequence

The draft genome sequence of 10.1601/nm.25336 A37T2T carries multiple genes involved in cellulolytic activity, including one gene encoding the enzyme cellulase (SCC15587) and six genes encoding for β-glucosidase (SCB82491, SCB92249, SCB95191, SCC15475, SCC57293, SCC61957), which might be involved in cellulose degradation in the environment and in biotechnological processes [24]. As expected for this genus, four genes encoding chitinases (SCC19468, SCC19522, SCC23114, SCC34676) were found. Six genes encoded lysophospholipase L1, including representatives of both of size groups, i.e. less than 300aa (SCB77875, SCC28514, SCC37316, SCC54197) and less than 500aa (SCB98645, SCC50813). Moreover, the genome of strain A37T2T encoded 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase (SCB80758), a hydrolase that might be involved in lowering ethylene levels in the plant [25]. In summary, the genome sequence suggested multiple potentials for the strain to interact with the plant metabolism.

Conclusions

This work contributed to the knowledge of the genome sequence of the type species of 10.1601/nm.25336 A37T2T (=10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DCIP+110584 T, =10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DLMG+27458 T), an endophyte of P. pinaster affected by PWD. The genome encoded multiple genes involved in cellulolytic activity and the sequence provided insights into the role of bacteria in PWD. As there are only a few bacterial genomes related to PWD, this work provides a contribution to this field.
  24 in total

1.  Solexa Ltd.

Authors:  Simon Bennett
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.533

2.  ARB: a software environment for sequence data.

Authors:  Wolfgang Ludwig; Oliver Strunk; Ralf Westram; Lothar Richter; Harald Meier; Arno Buchner; Tina Lai; Susanne Steppi; Gangolf Jobb; Wolfram Förster; Igor Brettske; Stefan Gerber; Anton W Ginhart; Oliver Gross; Silke Grumann; Stefan Hermann; Ralf Jost; Andreas König; Thomas Liss; Ralph Lüssmann; Michael May; Björn Nonhoff; Boris Reichel; Robert Strehlow; Alexandros Stamatakis; Norbert Stuckmann; Alexander Vilbig; Michael Lenke; Thomas Ludwig; Arndt Bode; Karl-Heinz Schleifer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-02-25       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models.

Authors:  Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP.

Authors:  Joseph Felsenstein
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Hydrotalea flava gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the phylum Bacteroidetes and allocation of the genera Chitinophaga, Sediminibacterium, Lacibacter, Flavihumibacter, Flavisolibacter, Niabella, Niastella, Segetibacter, Parasegetibacter, Terrimonas, Ferruginibacter, Filimonas and Hydrotalea to the family Chitinophagaceae fam. nov.

Authors:  P Kämpfer; N Lodders; E Falsen
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  SINA: accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes.

Authors:  Elmar Pruesse; Jörg Peplies; Frank Oliver Glöckner
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacterial and Archaeal Type Strains, Phase III: the genomes of soil and plant-associated and newly described type strains.

Authors:  William B Whitman; Tanja Woyke; Hans-Peter Klenk; Yuguang Zhou; Timothy G Lilburn; Brian J Beck; Paul De Vos; Peter Vandamme; Jonathan A Eisen; George Garrity; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2015-05-17

10.  The standard operating procedure of the DOE-JGI Microbial Genome Annotation Pipeline (MGAP v.4).

Authors:  Marcel Huntemann; Natalia N Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; H James Tripp; David Paez-Espino; Krishnaveni Palaniappan; Ernest Szeto; Manoj Pillay; I-Min A Chen; Amrita Pati; Torben Nielsen; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2015-10-26
View more
  1 in total

1.  Bagasse minority pathway expression: Real time study of GH2 β-mannosidases from bacteroidetes.

Authors:  Tatiane Fernanda Leonel; Elisângela Soares Gomes Pepe; Tereza Cristina Luque Castellane; Juliana da Silva Vantini; Michelli Inácio Gonçalves Funnicelli; Eliana Gertrudes de Macedo Lemos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.