| Literature DB >> 28904616 |
Mario Pérez-Venegas1, Gloria Reyes-Rangel1, Adrián Neri2, Jaime Escalante2, Eusebio Juaristi1,3.
Abstract
The use of mechanochemistry to carry out enantioselective reactions has been explored in the last ten years with excellent results. Several chiral organocatalysts and even enzymes have proved to be resistant to milling conditions, which allows for rather efficient enantioselective transformations under ball-milling conditions. The present article reports the first example of a liquid-assisted grinding (LAG) mechanochemical enzymatic resolution of racemic β3-amino esters employing Candida antarctica lipase B (CALB) to afford highly valuable enantioenriched N-benzylated-β3-amino acids in good yields. Furthermore the present protocol is readily scalable.Entities:
Keywords: Candida antarctica lipase B; ball-milling; enzymatic resolution; mechanochemistry; β3-amino acid
Year: 2017 PMID: 28904616 PMCID: PMC5564257 DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.13.167
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Org Chem ISSN: 1860-5397 Impact factor: 2.883
Scheme 1Enantioselective enzymatic hydrolysis of racemic β3-amino ester rac-1a using CALB in solution [52] (top) and under HSBM conditions (button). 2M2B: 2-methyl-2-butanol.
Search of the best parameters in the enzymatic enantioselective hydrolysis of rac-1a under ball milling.
| entrya | LAG additiveb | yield (%)c ( | time (h) | ee ( | ee ( | ||
| 1g | 2M2B | 51/49 | 0.5 | 99 | 80 | 55 | 46 |
| 2 | 2M2B | 70/30 | 0.5 | 89 | 77 | 54 | 23 |
| 4 | AcOEt | 86/13 | 1 | 69 | 95 | 42 | 81 |
| 5 | IPA | 82/21 | 1 | 48 | 95 | 34 | 63 |
| 6 | CH3CN | 65/29 | 1 | 65 | 95 | 41 | 77 |
| 7 | hexane | 40/60 | 1 | 97 | 86 | 53 | 55 |
| 8 | – | 58/41 | 1 | 95 | 92 | 51 | 89 |
| 9g | – | 58/42 | 1 | 93 | 86 | 52 | 45 |
| 10h | – | 68/31 | 1 | 74 | 80 | 48 | 20 |
aReactions were carried out with 0.5 equivalents of water and 15 Hz of frequency. b0.2 mL of LAG additive was used. cDetermined after purification by flash chromatography. dDetermined by HPLC with chiral stationary phase. eCalculated from c = ees/(ees + eep). fE = ln[1 − c(1 + eep)]/ln[1 − c(1 − eep)]. g25 Hz of frequency was used. h0.25 equivalents of water were used.
Substrate scope for the enzymatic resolution of N-benzylated-β3-amino esters.
| entrya | R | yield (%)b ( | eec ( | eec ( | absolute configurationh | |||||
| 1 | CH3-(CH2)- | 51/49 | 91 | 4.5 | 97 | −36.5 | 48 | >200 | ||
| 2 | CH3-(CH2)2- | 53/43 | 84 | 2.1 | 98 | −45.2 | 46 | >200 | ||
| 3 | CH3-(CH2)3- | 68/29 | 23 | 2.0 | 94 | −35.3 | 20 | 40 | ||
| 4 | CH3-(CH2)4- | 74/24 | 57 | 0.2 | 94 | −40.0 | 15 | 38 | ||
| 5 | CH3-(CH2)5- | 79/18 | 13 | 0.8 | 91 | −39.7 | 13 | 24 | ||
| 6i | Ph | 92/10 | 18 | 3.4 | 83 | −35.0 | 18 | 13 | ||
| 7i | 4-MeO-Ph | 89/10 | 1 | −0.5 | 80 | −31.7 | 1 | 9 | ||
| 8 | 89/4 | 4 | −0.6 | 94 | 12.8 | 4 | 34 | |||
aReactions were carried out with 0.5 equivalents of water and 0.2 mL of 2M2B at 15 Hz during 1 h. bDetermined after purification by flash chromatography. cDetermined by HPLC with chiral stationary phase. dc = 0.33 in CH3Cl. ec = 0.33 in MeOH. fCalculated from c = ees/(ees + eep). gE = ln[1 − c(1 + eep)]/ln[1 − c(1 − eep)]. hAssigned by chemical correlation and by HPLC with chiral stationary phase. i0.75 equivalents of water were used.
Figure 1X-ray crystallographic structure of product (R)-2a (50% of probability ellipsoids). CCDC registry number 1552645.
Recycling capacity of immobilized CALB under HSBM conditions.
| entrya | recycling cycle | yield (%)b ( | eec ( | eec ( | ||
| 1 | – | 51/49 | 49 | 95 | 51 | >200 |
| 2 | 1 | 65/37 | 35 | 88 | 59 | 22 |
| 3 | 2 | 80/20 | 6 | 80 | 51 | 10 |
| 4 | 3 | 100/0 | 0 | – | – | – |
aReactions were carried out with 0.5 equivalents of water and 0.2 mL of 2M2B at 15 Hz during 1 h. bDetermined after purification by flash chromatography. cDetermined by HPLC with chiral stationary phase. dCalculated from c = ees/(ees + eep). eE = ln[1 − c(1 + eep)]/ln[1 − c(1 − eep)].
Scaling-up of the enzymatic hydrolysis reaction under ball-milling using substrate rac-1a.
| entrya | catalyst/substrate (equiv) b | yield (%)c ( | eed ( | eed ( | ||
| 1g | 1/1 | 51/49 | >99 | 95 | 51 | >200 |
| 2 | 1/3 | 52/48 | 62 | 93 | 40 | 52 |
| 3 | 1/6 | 61/42 | 53 | 93 | 36 | 47 |
| 4 | 1/9 | 59/40 | 49 | 94 | 34 | 53 |
aReactions were carried out with 0.5 equivalents of water at 15 Hz during 1 h. b1 equivalent of enzyme = 40 mg; 1 equivalent of susbtrate = 82 mg. cDetermined after purification by flash chromatography. dDetermined by HPLC with chiral stationary phase. eCalculated from c = ees/(ees + eep). fE = ln[1 − c(1 + eep)]/ln[1 − c(1 − eep)]. g0.2 mL of LAG additive were used.