| Literature DB >> 28904438 |
T Kaur1, S Krishnaprasad1, R Shankar2, R Kumar3, S Gowrishankar1, M D Padua1.
Abstract
Infiltration of renal parenchyma by neoplastic plasma cells in myeloma patients is an unusual finding. We report 3 cases of myeloma, with renal biopsy being the first clue to the diagnosis in one. The plasma cell infiltrate in other two cases was not so evident but immunofluorescence (IF) and immunohistochemical (IHC) stains for light chains helped establish the monoclonal nature of the infiltrate. We surmise that plasma cell infiltration in the kidney can be an important clue to the diagnosis of an underlying myeloma and could in future be regarded as a myeloma-defining event (MDE) if monoclonality is confirmed. This finding could directly affect the prognosis and be a direct indicator of the tumor burden. Further studies are however required to determine the exact prognostic value and precise relationship of such a finding with deranged renal functions in myeloma.Entities:
Keywords: Myeloma; plasma cells; renal infiltration
Year: 2017 PMID: 28904438 PMCID: PMC5590419 DOI: 10.4103/ijn.IJN_215_16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Nephrol ISSN: 0971-4065
Details of the laboratory investigations of the three cases, listed according to the updated international myeloma working group guidelines (2015)
Figure 1Case 1: (a) Dense infiltrate of plasma cells in the interstitium, compressing the tubules and microvasculature (×4, H and E). (b) Atypical plasma cells can be appreciated with atypical hyperchromatic nuclei and many binucleated forms (×4, H and E). (c) Immunofluorescence study showing linear deposits of kappa along the glomerular basement membrane, Bowman's capsule and tubular basement membrane. (d) Immunostain for CD138 highlighting the plasma cells. (e) Immunostain for kappa is positive in the neoplastic plasma cells while that for lambda is negative (f)
Figure 2Case 2: (a) Bright eosinophilic casts in the dilated lumen of tubules inciting histiocytic reaction, and tubules showing features of tubular injury (×20, H and E). (b) Aggregates of atypical plasma cells and tubules showing marked thickening of the tubular basement membrane (×40, H and E). (c) CD138 immunostain highlighting the interstitial plasma cells. (d) Immunostain for lambda revealing lambda restricted plasma cells, and negative kappa (e, inset)
Figure 3Case 3: (a) Immunofluorescence for lambda light chains showing clusters of plasma cells picking up fluorescence and an occasional cast with lambda light chain restriction. (b) Lambda chain immunostain done on reprocessed tissue which was submitted for immunofluorescence, showing clusters of plasma cells with lambda chain restriction. Kappa light chains were negative