| Literature DB >> 28903669 |
Uri Lifshin1, Jeff Greenberg1, Colin A Zestcott1, Daniel Sullivan1.
Abstract
This research tested whether support for the killing of animals serves a terror management function. In five studies, death primes caused participants to support the killing of animals more than control primes, unless the participants' self-esteem had been elevated (Study 4). This effect was not moderated by gender, preexisting attitudes toward killing animals or animal rights, perceived human-animal similarity, religiosity, political orientation, or by the degree to which the killing was justified. Support for killing animals after subliminal death primes was also associated with an increased sense of power and invulnerability (Study 5). Implications and future directions are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: genocide; human–animal relations; terror management; violence
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28903669 DOI: 10.1177/0146167217697092
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pers Soc Psychol Bull ISSN: 0146-1672