Literature DB >> 28903056

Quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation during real-life out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Tore Gyllenborg1, Asger Granfeldt2, Freddy Lippert3, Ingunn Skogstad Riddervold4, Fredrik Folke5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can increase survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, little is known about bystander CPR quality in real-life OHCA. AIM: To describe bystander CPR quality based on automated external defibrillator (AED) CPR process data during OHCA and compare it with the European Resuscitation Council 2010 and 2015 Guidelines.
METHODS: We included OHCA cases from the Capital Region, Denmark, (2012-2016) where a Zoll AED was used before ambulance arrival. For cases with at least one minute of continuous data, the initial 10min of CPR data were analysed for compression rate, depth, fraction and compressions delivered for each minute of CPR. Data are presented as median [25th;75th percentile].
RESULTS: We included 136 cases. Bystander median compression rate was 101min-1 [94;113], compression depth was 4.8cm [3.9;5.8] and compressions per minute were 62 [48;73]. Of all cases, the median compression rate was 100-120min-1 in 42%, compression depth was 5-6cm in 26%, compression fraction≥60% in 51% and compressions delivered per minute exceeded 60 in 54%. In a minute-to-minute analysis, we found no evidence of deterioration in CPR quality over time. The median peri-shock pause was 27s [23;31] and the pre-shock pause was 19s [17;22].
CONCLUSIONS: The median CPR performed by bystanders using AEDs with audio-feedback in OHCA was within guideline recommendations without deterioration over time. Compression depth had poorer quality compared with other parameters. To improve bystander CPR quality, focus should be on proper compression depth and minimizing pauses.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bystander; Cardiac arrest; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Quality

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28903056     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  5 in total

1.  Experiences and Psychological Influences in Lay Rescuers Performing Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Hsuan-Hua Chen; Wen-Chu Chiang; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Chih-Hsien Lee; Zung Fan Yuan; Hao-Yang Lin; Lee-Fang Chew; Edward Pei-Chuan Huang; Chih-Wei Yang; Shih-Cheng Liao; Chi-Wei Lin; Ming-Ni Lee; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma
Journal:  J Acute Med       Date:  2020-12-01

2.  Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: Potential for Improvements in Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation.

Authors:  Richard Chocron; Julia Jobe; Sally Guan; Madeleine Kim; Mia Shigemura; Carol Fahrenbruch; Thomas Rea
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 5.501

3.  Inverse Association Between Bystander Use of Audiovisual Feedback From an Automated External Defibrillator and Return of Spontaneous Circulation.

Authors:  Laust Obling; Christian Hassager; Stig Nikolaj Blomberg; Fredrik Folke
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 6.106

4.  Different Resting Methods in Improving Laypersons Hands-Only Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality and Reducing Fatigue: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Authors:  Xuejie Dong; Qiang Zhou; Qiuchen Lu; Huiqiu Sheng; Lin Zhang; Zhi-Jie Zheng
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-11-12

5.  Collaboration between emergency physicians and citizen responders in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation.

Authors:  Anne-Sofie Linde Jellestad; Fredrik Folke; Rune Molin; Rasmus Meyer Lyngby; Carolina Malta Hansen; Linn Andelius
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.953

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.