Literature DB >> 28902803

Cochlear Implantation in Otosclerosis: Surgical and Auditory Outcomes With a Brief on Facial Nerve Stimulation.

Ashish Vashishth1, Andrea Fulcheri, Gianluca Rossi, Sampath Chandra Prasad, Antonio Caruso, Mario Sanna.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: 1) To review the surgical and auditory outcomes in patients of cochlear implantation in otosclerosis. 2) To review complications and postimplantation facial nerve stimulation (FNS). 3) To compare the auditory outcomes between patients displaying cochlear ossification to the nonossified ones. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Quaternary Otology and Skull base surgery center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Charts of 36 patients (38 ears) with otosclerosis undergoing cochlear implantation were reviewed from the cochlear implant database. Demographic features, operative findings, auditory outcomes, and postimplantation FNS were analyzed. Operative findings included extent of cochlear ossification, approach (posterior tympantomy/subtotal petrosectomy), electrode insertion (partial/complete, scala tympani/vestibuli), and complications. All the patients underwent implantation using straight electrodes. Auditory outcomes were assessed over a 4-year follow-up period using vowel, word, sentence, and comprehension scores. Patients were divided into two groups (with and without cochlear ossification) for comparison of auditory outcomes.
RESULTS: The mean age and duration of deafness of patients was 59.72 and 28.9 years respectively. Twenty-three of 38 ears had cochlear ossification, with exclusive round window involvement in 60% of the patients, with the rest having partial or complete basal turn ossification. 36.8% ears underwent subtotal petrosectomy for cochlear ossification. One patient underwent scala vestibuli insertion and two had incomplete electrode insertion. Patients with no ossification had no intra or postoperative complications. One patient had bilateral FNS managed by alterations in programming strategy. Auditory outcomes in patients without any ossification were better than in patients with ossification, though statistically insignificant in most parameters.
CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation in otosclerosis provides good auditory outcomes, despite high incidence of cochlear ossification. Patients of FNS can be managed by alterations in programming strategy, without affecting auditory outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28902803     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  8 in total

1.  Cochlear implant outcomes in the elderly: a uni- and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors.

Authors:  Niccolò Favaretto; Gino Marioni; Davide Brotto; Flavia Sorrentino; Flavia Gheller; Alessandro Castiglione; Silvia Montino; Luciano Giacomelli; Patrizia Trevisi; Alessandro Martini; Roberto Bovo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Cochlear implantation outcomes in patients with otosclerosis: a single-centre study.

Authors:  Srebrena Atanasova-Koch; Peter Rolf Issing
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Cochlear implantation among patients with otosclerosis: a systematic review of clinical characteristics and outcomes.

Authors:  Majed Assiri; Tawfiq Khurayzi; Afrah Alshalan; Abdulrahman Alsanosi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Surgical Planning for Cochlear Implantation in Far-Advanced Otosclerosis: The Utility of OTOPLAN.

Authors:  Andrea Lovato; Cosimo de Filippis
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-12-01

5.  Histopathologic Analysis of Temporal Bones With Otosclerosis Following Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Sarah E Hodge; Gail Ishiyama; Ivan A Lopez; Akira Ishiyama
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.619

6.  OTOPLAN, Cochlear Implant, and Far-Advanced Otosclerosis: Could the Use of Software Improve the Surgical Final Indication?

Authors:  Giampietro Ricci; Ruggero Lapenna; Valeria Gambacorta; Antonio Della Volpe; Mario Faralli; Arianna Di Stadio
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Scala vestibuli cochlear implant supported by 3D modeling of the inner ear.

Authors:  Clemens Holzmeister; Alexandros Andrianakis; Peter Kiss; Ulrich Moser; Matthias Graupp
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Postoperative radiological assessment of the mastoid facial canal in cochlear implant patients in correlation with facial nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Iris Burck; Rania A Helal; Nagy N N Naguib; Nour-Eldin A Nour-Eldin; Jan-Erik Scholtz; Simon Martin; Martin Leinung; Silke Helbig; Timo Stöver; Annette Lehn; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.315

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.