Literature DB >> 28902590

Long-Term Outcomes of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Medical Therapy after Stroke.

Jeffrey L Saver1, John D Carroll1, David E Thaler1, Richard W Smalling1, Lee A MacDonald1, David S Marks1, David L Tirschwell1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether closure of a patent foramen ovale reduces the risk of recurrence of ischemic stroke in patients who have had a cryptogenic ischemic stroke is unknown.
METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial, with blinded adjudication of end-point events, we randomly assigned patients 18 to 60 years of age who had a patent foramen ovale (PFO) and had had a cryptogenic ischemic stroke to undergo closure of the PFO (PFO closure group) or to receive medical therapy alone (aspirin, warfarin, clopidogrel, or aspirin combined with extended-release dipyridamole; medical-therapy group). The primary efficacy end point was a composite of recurrent nonfatal ischemic stroke, fatal ischemic stroke, or early death after randomization. The results of the analysis of the primary outcome from the original trial period have been reported previously; the current analysis of data from the extended follow-up period was considered to be exploratory.
RESULTS: We enrolled 980 patients (mean age, 45.9 years) at 69 sites. Patients were followed for a median of 5.9 years. Treatment exposure in the two groups was unequal (3141 patient-years in the PFO closure group vs. 2669 patient-years in the medical-therapy group), owing to a higher dropout rate in the medical-therapy group. In the intention-to-treat population, recurrent ischemic stroke occurred in 18 patients in the PFO closure group and in 28 patients in the medical-therapy group, resulting in rates of 0.58 events per 100 patient-years and 1.07 events per 100 patient-years, respectively (hazard ratio with PFO closure vs. medical therapy, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.999; P=0.046 by the log-rank test). Recurrent ischemic stroke of undetermined cause occurred in 10 patients in the PFO closure group and in 23 patients in the medical-therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.79; P=0.007). Venous thromboembolism (which comprised events of pulmonary embolism and deep-vein thrombosis) was more common in the PFO closure group than in the medical-therapy group.
CONCLUSIONS: Among adults who had had a cryptogenic ischemic stroke, closure of a PFO was associated with a lower rate of recurrent ischemic strokes than medical therapy alone during extended follow-up. (Funded by St. Jude Medical; RESPECT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00465270 .).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28902590     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  161 in total

Review 1.  Management of Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS).

Authors:  Tobias Geisler; Annerose Mengel; Ulf Ziemann; Sven Poli
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Interaction of cardiac implantable electronic device and patent foramen ovale in ischemic stroke: A case-only study.

Authors:  Kolade M Agboola; Jin-Moo Lee; Xiaoyan Liu; Eric Novak; Phillip S Cuculich; Daniel H Cooper; Amit Noheria
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Paradoxical emboli following a pulmonary embolus in the presence of a patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  Khalid Najib; Mark Heckle; Sameh Goubran; Rhadika Mehta; Rohan Goswami; Rami N Khouzam
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-01

Review 4.  Current management aspects in adult congenital heart disease: non-surgical closure of patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  Kaivan Vaidya; Chinmay Khandkar; David Celermajer
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-12

5.  Stimulating a natural process for PFO closure.

Authors:  Thorsten Lewalter
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Diagnosis of patent foramen ovale using maximum intensity T-projection imaging.

Authors:  Marina Leitman; David S Blondheim; Sergiu Sabetay; Vladimir Tyomkin
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke in patients with patent foramen ovale: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elisa Maria Fiorelli; Tiziana Carandini; Delia Gagliardi; Viviana Bozzano; Mattia Bonzi; Eleonora Tobaldini; Giacomo Pietro Comi; Elio Angelo Scarpini; Nicola Montano; Monica Solbiati
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.397

8.  Cost-Effectiveness of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Versus Medical Therapy for Secondary Stroke Prevention.

Authors:  Michelle H Leppert; Sharon N Poisson; John D Carroll; David E Thaler; Chong H Kim; Karen D Orjuela; P Michael Ho; James F Burke; Jonathan D Campbell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Rivaroxaban or aspirin for patent foramen ovale and embolic stroke of undetermined source: a prespecified subgroup analysis from the NAVIGATE ESUS trial.

Authors:  Scott E Kasner; Balakumar Swaminathan; Pablo Lavados; Mukul Sharma; Keith Muir; Roland Veltkamp; Sebastian F Ameriso; Matthias Endres; Helmi Lutsep; Steven R Messé; J David Spence; Krassen Nedeltechev; Kanjana Perera; Gustavo Santo; Veronica Olavarria; Arne Lindgren; Shrikant Bangdiwala; Ashkan Shoamanesh; Scott D Berkowitz; Hardi Mundl; Stuart J Connolly; Robert G Hart
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 44.182

10.  Closure of foramen ovale triggered by injury to tunnel surfaces of septum primum and secundum.

Authors:  Luigi Di Biase; J David Burkhardt; Rodney Horton; Javier Sanchez; Prasant Mohanty; Sanghamitra Mohanty; Shane Bailey; G Joseph Gallinghouse; Andrea Natale; Subramaniam C Krishnan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.