Literature DB >> 28902424

Anatomy and evolution of database search engines-a central component of mass spectrometry based proteomic workflows.

Kenneth Verheggen1,2,3, Helge Raeder4,5, Frode S Berven6, Lennart Martens1,2,3, Harald Barsnes4,6,7, Marc Vaudel4,6,8.   

Abstract

Sequence database search engines are bioinformatics algorithms that identify peptides from tandem mass spectra using a reference protein sequence database. Two decades of development, notably driven by advances in mass spectrometry, have provided scientists with more than 30 published search engines, each with its own properties. In this review, we present the common paradigm behind the different implementations, and its limitations for modern mass spectrometry datasets. We also detail how the search engines attempt to alleviate these limitations, and provide an overview of the different software frameworks available to the researcher. Finally, we highlight alternative approaches for the identification of proteomic mass spectrometry datasets, either as a replacement for, or as a complement to, sequence database search engines.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  bioinformatics; proteomics; search engine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28902424     DOI: 10.1002/mas.21543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev        ISSN: 0277-7037            Impact factor:   10.946


  24 in total

Review 1.  Mapping the tumour human leukocyte antigen (HLA) ligandome by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Lena Katharina Freudenmann; Ana Marcu; Stefan Stevanović
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 7.397

2.  Averaging Strategy To Reduce Variability in Target-Decoy Estimates of False Discovery Rate.

Authors:  Uri Keich; Kaipo Tamura; William Stafford Noble
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  MoMo: discovery of statistically significant post-translational modification motifs.

Authors:  Alice Cheng; Charles E Grant; William S Noble; Timothy L Bailey
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Proteomics Standards Initiative Extended FASTA Format.

Authors:  Pierre-Alain Binz; Jim Shofstahl; Juan Antonio Vizcaíno; Harald Barsnes; Robert J Chalkley; Gerben Menschaert; Emanuele Alpi; Karl Clauser; Jimmy K Eng; Lydie Lane; Sean L Seymour; Luis Francisco Hernández Sánchez; Gerhard Mayer; Martin Eisenacher; Yasset Perez-Riverol; Eugene A Kapp; Luis Mendoza; Peter R Baker; Andrew Collins; Tim Van Den Bossche; Eric W Deutsch
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 5.  Paleoproteomics.

Authors:  Christina Warinner; Kristine Korzow Richter; Matthew J Collins
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 72.087

Review 6.  -Omics potential of in vitro skin models for radiation exposure.

Authors:  Leyla A Akh; Mohammad O Ishak; Jennifer F Harris; Trevor G Glaros; Zachary J Sasiene; Phillip M Mach; Laura M Lilley; Ethan M McBride
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 9.207

Review 7.  Deepening our understanding of HDL proteome.

Authors:  Graziella Eliza Ronsein; Tomáš Vaisar
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.940

Review 8.  Leveraging orthogonal mass spectrometry based strategies for comprehensive sequencing and characterization of ribosomal antimicrobial peptide natural products.

Authors:  Tessa B Moyer; Nicole C Parsley; Patric W Sadecki; Wyatt J Schug; Leslie M Hicks
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 13.423

9.  Software Options for the Analysis of MS-Proteomic Data.

Authors:  Avinash Yadav; Federica Marini; Alessandro Cuomo; Tiziana Bonaldi
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 10.  Low-cost and open-source strategies for chemical separations.

Authors:  Joshua J Davis; Samuel W Foster; James P Grinias
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 4.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.