Literature DB >> 28902421

The impact of white matter fiber orientation in single-acquisition quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Marta Lancione1, Michela Tosetti2,3, Graziella Donatelli1, Mirco Cosottini1, Mauro Costagli2,3.   

Abstract

The aim of this work was to assess the impact of tissue structural orientation on quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) reliability, and to provide a criterion to identify voxels in which measures of magnetic susceptibility (χ) are most affected by spatial orientation effects. Four healthy volunteers underwent 7-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Multi-echo, gradient-echo sequences were used to obtain quantitative maps of frequency shift (FS) and χ. Information from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was used to investigate the relationship between tissue orientation and FS measures and QSM. After sorting voxels on the basis of their fractional anisotropy (FA), the variations in FS and χ values over tissue orientation were measured. Using a K-means clustering algorithm, voxels were separated into two groups depending on the variability of measures within each FA interval. The consistency of FS and QSM values, observed at low FA, was disrupted for FA > 0.6. The standard deviation of χ measured at high FA (0.0103 ppm) was nearly five times that at low FA (0.0022 ppm). This result was consistent through data across different head positions and for different brain regions considered separately, which confirmed that such behavior does not depend on structures with different bulk susceptibility oriented along particular angles. The reliability of single-orientation QSM anticorrelates with local FA. QSM provides replicable values with little variability in brain regions with FA < 0.6, but QSM should be interpreted cautiously in major and coherent fiber bundles, which are strongly affected by structural anisotropy and magnetic susceptibility anisotropy.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contrast mechanism; fractional anisotropy; magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic susceptibility; tissue orientation; white matter

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28902421     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of parameter optimization methods for quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Carlos Milovic; Claudia Prieto; Berkin Bilgic; Sergio Uribe; Julio Acosta-Cabronero; Pablo Irarrazaval; Cristian Tejos
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Thalamic white matter in multiple sclerosis: A combined diffusion-tensor imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping study.

Authors:  Niels Bergsland; Ferdinand Schweser; Michael G Dwyer; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman; Ralph H B Benedict; Robert Zivadinov
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Serial assessment of iron in the motor cortex in limb-onset amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Anjan Bhattarai; Zhaolin Chen; Phillip G D Ward; Paul Talman; Susan Mathers; Thanh G Phan; Caron Chapman; James Howe; Sarah Lee; Yennie Lie; Gary F Egan; Phyllis Chua
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-07

4.  Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: MRI at 7T versus 3T.

Authors:  Pascal Spincemaille; Julie Anderson; Gaohong Wu; Baolian Yang; Maggie Fung; Ke Li; Shaojun Li; Ilhami Kovanlikaya; Ajay Gupta; Douglas Kelley; Nissim Benhamo; Yi Wang
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  MR Susceptibility Imaging with a Short TE (MR-SISET): A Clinically Feasible Technique to Resolve Thalamic Nuclei.

Authors:  S Chung; P Storey; T M Shepherd; Y W Lui
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Topics and trends in artificial intelligence assisted human brain research.

Authors:  Xieling Chen; Juan Chen; Gary Cheng; Tao Gong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  HFP-QSMGAN: QSM from homodyne-filtered phase images.

Authors:  Vincent Beliveau; Christoph Birkl; Ambra Stefani; Elke R Gizewski; Christoph Scherfler
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.737

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.